Diabetes in residential aged care: Pharmacological management and concordance with clinical guidelines.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Australasian Journal on Ageing Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1111/ajag.13351
Hargun Bhalla, Guogui Huang, Karla Seaman, S Sandun Malpriya Silva, Bosco Wu, Nasir Wabe, Johanna I Westbrook, Amy D Nguyen
{"title":"Diabetes in residential aged care: Pharmacological management and concordance with clinical guidelines.","authors":"Hargun Bhalla, Guogui Huang, Karla Seaman, S Sandun Malpriya Silva, Bosco Wu, Nasir Wabe, Johanna I Westbrook, Amy D Nguyen","doi":"10.1111/ajag.13351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Existing studies have highlighted suboptimal diabetes management in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). However, understanding of diabetes management in Australian metropolitan RACFs has been limited. This retrospective cohort study aimed to explore the pharmacological management of diabetes in 25 RACFs in Sydney Australia and assess concordance with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 231 permanent RACF residents aged ≥65 years and over with type 2 diabetes mellitus over the period from 1 July 2016 to 31 December 2019 were used. Concordance was measured by assessing the medications and medical history data for each individual resident for concordance with evidence-based CPGs. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of resident characteristics on concordance with CPGs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 231 residents with diabetes, 87 (38%) were not taking any antidiabetic medication. Pharmacological management inconsistent with CPG recommendations was observed for 73 (32%) residents, with the most common reason for non-concordance being the use of medications with significant adverse effects in older adults (47, 2%). Residents with hypertension or other heart diseases in addition to their diabetes had greater odds of their diabetes management being non-concordant with CPGs (OR = 2.84 95% CI = 1.54, 5.3 and OR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.07, 6.41, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmacological diabetes management in metropolitan Australian RACFs is suboptimal, with a high prevalence of inconsistency with CPGs (32%) observed. Additionally, having hypertension or heart diseases significantly increased the possibility of non-concordance among diabetic RACF residents. Further investigation into the underlying relationships with comorbidities is required to develop better strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":" ","pages":"792-801"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13351","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Existing studies have highlighted suboptimal diabetes management in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). However, understanding of diabetes management in Australian metropolitan RACFs has been limited. This retrospective cohort study aimed to explore the pharmacological management of diabetes in 25 RACFs in Sydney Australia and assess concordance with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).

Methods: Data from 231 permanent RACF residents aged ≥65 years and over with type 2 diabetes mellitus over the period from 1 July 2016 to 31 December 2019 were used. Concordance was measured by assessing the medications and medical history data for each individual resident for concordance with evidence-based CPGs. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of resident characteristics on concordance with CPGs.

Results: Of the 231 residents with diabetes, 87 (38%) were not taking any antidiabetic medication. Pharmacological management inconsistent with CPG recommendations was observed for 73 (32%) residents, with the most common reason for non-concordance being the use of medications with significant adverse effects in older adults (47, 2%). Residents with hypertension or other heart diseases in addition to their diabetes had greater odds of their diabetes management being non-concordant with CPGs (OR = 2.84 95% CI = 1.54, 5.3 and OR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.07, 6.41, respectively).

Conclusions: Pharmacological diabetes management in metropolitan Australian RACFs is suboptimal, with a high prevalence of inconsistency with CPGs (32%) observed. Additionally, having hypertension or heart diseases significantly increased the possibility of non-concordance among diabetic RACF residents. Further investigation into the underlying relationships with comorbidities is required to develop better strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年护理院中的糖尿病患者:药物管理与临床指南的一致性。
目的:现有研究强调,养老院(RACF)中的糖尿病管理不尽如人意。然而,人们对澳大利亚大都市养老院糖尿病管理的了解还很有限。这项回顾性队列研究旨在探讨澳大利亚悉尼25家养老院的糖尿病药物管理情况,并评估与临床实践指南(CPG)的一致性:研究使用了231名年龄≥65岁及以上的2型糖尿病患者在2016年7月1日至2019年12月31日期间的RACF常住居民数据。通过评估每位居民的用药和病史数据与循证 CPGs 的一致性来衡量一致性。多变量逻辑回归用于估计居民特征对 CPGs 一致性的影响:结果:在 231 名患有糖尿病的住院患者中,有 87 人(38%)没有服用任何抗糖尿病药物。有 73 名住院患者(32%)的药物管理与 CPG 建议不一致,不一致的最常见原因是使用了对老年人有明显不良反应的药物(47.2%)。除糖尿病外,患有高血压或其他心脏病的居民的糖尿病管理与 CPGs 不一致的几率更大(OR = 2.84 95% CI = 1.54,5.3 和 OR = 2.64,95% CI = 1.07,6.41):在澳大利亚大都市的 RACF 中,糖尿病药物治疗效果并不理想,与 CPGs 不一致的比例很高(32%)。此外,患有高血压或心脏病的 RACF 糖尿病住院患者出现用药不一致的可能性大大增加。为制定更好的策略,需要进一步调查与合并症之间的潜在关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Short-Term Restorative Care program: Effects on physical functioning. Knowledge of dementia: A cross-sectional survey of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community members and health-care workers providing care to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Food, nutrition and dining information on residential aged care facility websites: A website analysis. Need to develop a healthy ageing and fall prevention exercise program for older people with sarcopenia. Prospective association between social isolation, loneliness and lung function among Chinese middle-aged and older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1