One out of two idiopathic infertile men has pathologic sperm DNA fragmentation values: Potential implications for clinical practice

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Clinical Endocrinology Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1111/cen.15093
Luca Boeri, Edoardo Pozzi, Federico Belladelli, Christian Corsini, Simone Cilio, Alessandro Bertini, Francesco Lanzaro, Luigi Candela, Massimiliano Raffo, Fausto Negri, Ludovica Cella, Margherita Fantin, Giuseppe Fallara, Paolo Capogrosso, Alessia d'Arma, Francesco Montorsi, Andrea Salonia
{"title":"One out of two idiopathic infertile men has pathologic sperm DNA fragmentation values: Potential implications for clinical practice","authors":"Luca Boeri,&nbsp;Edoardo Pozzi,&nbsp;Federico Belladelli,&nbsp;Christian Corsini,&nbsp;Simone Cilio,&nbsp;Alessandro Bertini,&nbsp;Francesco Lanzaro,&nbsp;Luigi Candela,&nbsp;Massimiliano Raffo,&nbsp;Fausto Negri,&nbsp;Ludovica Cella,&nbsp;Margherita Fantin,&nbsp;Giuseppe Fallara,&nbsp;Paolo Capogrosso,&nbsp;Alessia d'Arma,&nbsp;Francesco Montorsi,&nbsp;Andrea Salonia","doi":"10.1111/cen.15093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the distribution of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) values and their association with clinical and seminal parameters in idiopathic infertile men.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design, Patients, Measurements</h3>\n \n <p>Data from 3224 primary infertile men (belonging to couples having failed to conceive a pregnancy within 12 months) who underwent a thorough diagnostic work-up were analysed. A SDF value ≥ 30% (according to Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay) was considered pathologic. We excluded: (1) men with genetic abnormalities; (2) men with history of cryptorchidism; (3) men with biochemical hypogonadism; (4) men with clinical varicocele; and (5) men with other possible known aetiological factors. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were used to describe the whole cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of all, 792 (23%) men with at least one abnormal WHO semen parameter but without any identified aetiologic factor for infertility, were considered as idiopathic infertile men. Of 792, 418 (52.7%) men had SDF ≥30%. Men with pathologic SDF were older (<i>p</i> = .02), had higher Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (<i>p</i> = .04) but lower total testosterone (<i>p</i> = .03) values than those with SDF &lt;30%. The homoeostatic model assessment index for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was higher in men with SDF ≥30% (<i>p</i> = .01). Idiopathic infertile men with SDF ≥30% presented with lower sperm concentration (<i>p</i> &lt; .001) and lower progressive sperm motility (<i>p</i> &lt; .01) than those with SDF &lt; 30%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that older age (OR: 1.1, <i>p</i> = .02) and higher HOMA-IR score (OR: 1.8, <i>p</i> = .03) were associated with SDF ≥ 30%, after accounting for FSH and sperm concentration values.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Approximately half of infertile men categorized as idiopathic had pathologic SDF values. Idiopathic infertile men with pathologic SDF showed worse clinical, hormonal and semen parameters than those with normal SDF values. These results suggest that including SDF testing could be clinically relevant over the real-life management work-up of infertile men.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10346,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endocrinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cen.15093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the distribution of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) values and their association with clinical and seminal parameters in idiopathic infertile men.

Design, Patients, Measurements

Data from 3224 primary infertile men (belonging to couples having failed to conceive a pregnancy within 12 months) who underwent a thorough diagnostic work-up were analysed. A SDF value ≥ 30% (according to Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay) was considered pathologic. We excluded: (1) men with genetic abnormalities; (2) men with history of cryptorchidism; (3) men with biochemical hypogonadism; (4) men with clinical varicocele; and (5) men with other possible known aetiological factors. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were used to describe the whole cohort.

Results

Of all, 792 (23%) men with at least one abnormal WHO semen parameter but without any identified aetiologic factor for infertility, were considered as idiopathic infertile men. Of 792, 418 (52.7%) men had SDF ≥30%. Men with pathologic SDF were older (p = .02), had higher Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (p = .04) but lower total testosterone (p = .03) values than those with SDF <30%. The homoeostatic model assessment index for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was higher in men with SDF ≥30% (p = .01). Idiopathic infertile men with SDF ≥30% presented with lower sperm concentration (p < .001) and lower progressive sperm motility (p < .01) than those with SDF < 30%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that older age (OR: 1.1, p = .02) and higher HOMA-IR score (OR: 1.8, p = .03) were associated with SDF ≥ 30%, after accounting for FSH and sperm concentration values.

Conclusions

Approximately half of infertile men categorized as idiopathic had pathologic SDF values. Idiopathic infertile men with pathologic SDF showed worse clinical, hormonal and semen parameters than those with normal SDF values. These results suggest that including SDF testing could be clinically relevant over the real-life management work-up of infertile men.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
每两名特发性不育男性中,就有一人的精子DNA碎片值达到病理水平:对临床实践的潜在影响
目的研究特发性不育男性精子DNA碎片(SDF)值的分布及其与临床和精液参数的关系。SDF值≥30%(根据精子染色质结构测定法)被认为是病理性的。我们排除了我们排除了:(1) 基因异常的男性;(2) 有隐睾症病史的男性;(3) 生化性腺功能低下的男性;(4) 有临床精索静脉曲张的男性;(5) 有其他已知致病因素的男性。结果 792 名(23%)男性至少有一项世卫组织精液参数异常,但没有任何已确定的不育致病因素,被认为是特发性不育男性。在 792 人中,418 人(52.7%)的 SDF ≥30%。与SDF <30%的男性相比,病理性SDF的男性年龄更大(p = .02),卵泡刺激素(FSH)值更高(p = .04),但总睾酮(p = .03)值更低。SDF≥30%的男性胰岛素抵抗同生态模型评估指数(HOMA-IR)较高(p = .01)。与 SDF < 30% 的男性相比,SDF ≥30% 的特发性不育男性精子浓度较低(p < .001),精子活力也较低(p < .01)。逻辑回归分析表明,在考虑 FSH 和精子浓度值后,年龄较大(OR:1.1,p = .02)和 HOMA-IR 评分较高(OR:1.8,p = .03)与 SDF ≥ 30% 相关。与 SDF 值正常的男性相比,具有病理 SDF 的特发性不育男性的临床、激素和精液参数更差。这些结果表明,在不育男性的实际管理工作中,SDF检测可能具有临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Endocrinology
Clinical Endocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Endocrinology publishes papers and reviews which focus on the clinical aspects of endocrinology, including the clinical application of molecular endocrinology. It does not publish papers relating directly to diabetes care and clinical management. It features reviews, original papers, commentaries, correspondence and Clinical Questions. Clinical Endocrinology is essential reading not only for those engaged in endocrinological research but also for those involved primarily in clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
WITHDRAWN: New thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy needle. Prospective, randomized, clinical study. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Diagnosing Thyroid Nodules With Indeterminate Cytology: A Retrospective Study. Effect of Antithyroid Drugs Treatment Duration on The Remission Rates of Graves' Disease in Children and Adolescents: A Single-Arm Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Issue Information Instructions for authors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1