Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis is associated with increased all-cause mortality

Zhao Li, Rui Song, Yingzhi Zhang, Jiahe Tan, Zhiwei Chen
{"title":"Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis is associated with increased all-cause mortality","authors":"Zhao Li, Rui Song, Yingzhi Zhang, Jiahe Tan, Zhiwei Chen","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.28.24309687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recently, the new nomenclature metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) was proposed to supersede non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). To optimize the management of these patients, it is crucial to comprehend the similarities and differences between individuals with NASH and MASH.\nMethods: We analyzed data from 13,846 participants in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, along with their linked mortality through 2019. NASH and MASH were defined based on respective criteria. Survey-weight adjusted multivariable Cox proportional model was used to examine mortality.\nResults: The overall prevalence of steatohepatitis, NASH and MASH was 5.7% (n=788), 4.1% (n=564) and 5.5% (n=763), respectively. Most individuals with NASH (96.8%) could be categorized as MASH, but only 69.7% individuals with MASH qualified as NASH. During a median follow-up of 27 years, individuals with MASH exhibited a 53% higher risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.53, 95% CI 1.24-1.89). But individuals with NASH did not show an association with all-cause mortality after adjustment for metabolic risk factors (aHR 1.14, 95% CI 0.91-1.44). Notably, individuals who met the criteria for MASH but not NASH (NASH(-)/MASH(+)) had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (aHR 2.47, 95% CI 1.71-3.57) compared to those with NASH(+)/MASH(+) (aHR 1.22, 95% CI 0.97-1.55). Moreover, advanced fibrosis was only associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in individuals with MASH, not NASH.\nConclusions: MASH, rather than NASH, was associated with an elevated risk of all-cause mortality after adjusting for metabolic risk factors. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to assess and validate our findings.","PeriodicalId":501258,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Gastroenterology","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.28.24309687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recently, the new nomenclature metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) was proposed to supersede non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). To optimize the management of these patients, it is crucial to comprehend the similarities and differences between individuals with NASH and MASH. Methods: We analyzed data from 13,846 participants in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, along with their linked mortality through 2019. NASH and MASH were defined based on respective criteria. Survey-weight adjusted multivariable Cox proportional model was used to examine mortality. Results: The overall prevalence of steatohepatitis, NASH and MASH was 5.7% (n=788), 4.1% (n=564) and 5.5% (n=763), respectively. Most individuals with NASH (96.8%) could be categorized as MASH, but only 69.7% individuals with MASH qualified as NASH. During a median follow-up of 27 years, individuals with MASH exhibited a 53% higher risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.53, 95% CI 1.24-1.89). But individuals with NASH did not show an association with all-cause mortality after adjustment for metabolic risk factors (aHR 1.14, 95% CI 0.91-1.44). Notably, individuals who met the criteria for MASH but not NASH (NASH(-)/MASH(+)) had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (aHR 2.47, 95% CI 1.71-3.57) compared to those with NASH(+)/MASH(+) (aHR 1.22, 95% CI 0.97-1.55). Moreover, advanced fibrosis was only associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in individuals with MASH, not NASH. Conclusions: MASH, rather than NASH, was associated with an elevated risk of all-cause mortality after adjusting for metabolic risk factors. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to assess and validate our findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝炎与全因死亡率增加有关
背景:最近,新的代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝炎(MASH)被提出来取代非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)。为了优化对这些患者的管理,了解 NASH 和 MASH 患者的异同至关重要:我们分析了第三次全国健康与营养调查中 13846 名参与者的数据,以及截至 2019 年的相关死亡率。NASH 和 MASH 是根据各自的标准定义的。采用调查体重调整后的多变量考克斯比例模型来研究死亡率:结果:脂肪性肝炎、NASH 和 MASH 的总患病率分别为 5.7%(n=788)、4.1%(n=564)和 5.5%(n=763)。大多数 NASH 患者(96.8%)可归类为 MASH,但只有 69.7% 的 MASH 患者可归类为 NASH。在 27 年的中位随访期间,MASH 患者的全因死亡风险高出 53%(调整后危险比 [aHR] 1.53,95% CI 1.24-1.89)。但在对代谢风险因素进行调整后,NASH 患者与全因死亡率并无关联(aHR 1.14,95% CI 0.91-1.44)。值得注意的是,与NASH(+)/MASH(+)患者(aHR 1.22,95% CI 0.97-1.55)相比,符合MASH标准但不符合NASH标准(NASH(-)/MASH(+))的患者全因死亡风险更高(aHR 2.47,95% CI 1.71-3.57)。此外,晚期纤维化仅与MASH患者的全因死亡风险增加有关,而与NASH无关:结论:在调整代谢风险因素后,MASH 而非 NASH 与全因死亡风险升高有关。需要设计良好的前瞻性研究来评估和验证我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gut microbiome shifts in adolescents after sleeve gastrectomy with increased oral-associated taxa and pro-inflammatory potential Development of a machine-learning model for therapeutic efficacy prediction of preoperative treatment for esophageal cancer using single nucleotide variants of autophagy-related genes Why Symptoms Linger in Quiescent Crohn's Disease: Investigating the Impact of Sulfidogenic Microbes and Sulfur Metabolic Pathways Evidence that extracellular HSPB1 contributes to inflammation in alcohol-associated hepatitis Large language models outperform traditional natural language processing methods in extracting patient-reported outcomes in IBD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1