Degree assortativity in collaboration networks and breakthrough innovation: the moderating role of knowledge networks

IF 3.5 3区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Scientometrics Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1007/s11192-024-05063-7
Runhui Lin, Biting Li, Yanhong Lu, Yalin Li
{"title":"Degree assortativity in collaboration networks and breakthrough innovation: the moderating role of knowledge networks","authors":"Runhui Lin, Biting Li, Yanhong Lu, Yalin Li","doi":"10.1007/s11192-024-05063-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Collaboration networks are widely recognized as essential channels for accessing innovation resources and facilitating creative activities by enabling the exchange of knowledge and information. However, there is little known about whether and how the similarities and dissimilarities between actors forming ties in a collaboration network can either stimulate or inhibit firms’ breakthrough innovation. This study explores the relationship between degree assortativity in collaboration networks and breakthrough innovation performance, considering the moderating role of knowledge network characteristics. Using a sample of 80,129 semiconductor patents from the United States Patent and Trademark Office database spanning the years 1975 to 2007, we constructed both the internal collaboration network and the knowledge network of firms. To test our hypotheses, we employed a negative binomial regression model. Our findings demonstrate that firms with lower degree assortativity in their collaboration networks tend to exhibit higher levels of breakthrough innovation performance compared to those with higher degree assortativity. Moreover, the number of direct ties in the knowledge network strengthens the negative relationship between collaboration network degree assortativity and breakthrough innovation. Conversely, the number of non-redundant ties in the knowledge network mitigates the negative relationship between collaboration network degree assortativity and breakthrough innovation. This study provides practical guidance for firms aiming to enhance their innovation capabilities by simultaneously developing internal collaboration networks and knowledge networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":21755,"journal":{"name":"Scientometrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientometrics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05063-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaboration networks are widely recognized as essential channels for accessing innovation resources and facilitating creative activities by enabling the exchange of knowledge and information. However, there is little known about whether and how the similarities and dissimilarities between actors forming ties in a collaboration network can either stimulate or inhibit firms’ breakthrough innovation. This study explores the relationship between degree assortativity in collaboration networks and breakthrough innovation performance, considering the moderating role of knowledge network characteristics. Using a sample of 80,129 semiconductor patents from the United States Patent and Trademark Office database spanning the years 1975 to 2007, we constructed both the internal collaboration network and the knowledge network of firms. To test our hypotheses, we employed a negative binomial regression model. Our findings demonstrate that firms with lower degree assortativity in their collaboration networks tend to exhibit higher levels of breakthrough innovation performance compared to those with higher degree assortativity. Moreover, the number of direct ties in the knowledge network strengthens the negative relationship between collaboration network degree assortativity and breakthrough innovation. Conversely, the number of non-redundant ties in the knowledge network mitigates the negative relationship between collaboration network degree assortativity and breakthrough innovation. This study provides practical guidance for firms aiming to enhance their innovation capabilities by simultaneously developing internal collaboration networks and knowledge networks.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合作网络中的程度同类性与突破性创新:知识网络的调节作用
人们普遍认为,合作网络是获取创新资源和通过知识与信息交流促进创新活动的重要渠道。然而,人们对合作网络中形成联系的参与者之间的相似性和不相似性是否以及如何刺激或抑制企业的突破性创新却知之甚少。考虑到知识网络特征的调节作用,本研究探讨了合作网络中的程度同质性与突破性创新绩效之间的关系。我们以美国专利商标局数据库中 1975 年至 2007 年的 80129 项半导体专利为样本,构建了企业的内部协作网络和知识网络。为了验证假设,我们采用了负二项回归模型。我们的研究结果表明,与同类程度较高的企业相比,合作网络中同类程度较低的企业往往表现出更高的突破性创新绩效。此外,知识网络中直接联系的数量加强了协作网络程度同质性与突破性创新之间的负相关关系。相反,知识网络中的非冗余纽带数量则会缓解协作网络程度同质性与突破性创新之间的负相关。这项研究为企业通过同时发展内部协作网络和知识网络来提高创新能力提供了实际指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scientometrics
Scientometrics 管理科学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
351
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Scientometrics aims at publishing original studies, short communications, preliminary reports, review papers, letters to the editor and book reviews on scientometrics. The topics covered are results of research concerned with the quantitative features and characteristics of science. Emphasis is placed on investigations in which the development and mechanism of science are studied by means of (statistical) mathematical methods. The Journal also provides the reader with important up-to-date information about international meetings and events in scientometrics and related fields. Appropriate bibliographic compilations are published as a separate section. Due to its fully interdisciplinary character, Scientometrics is indispensable to research workers and research administrators throughout the world. It provides valuable assistance to librarians and documentalists in central scientific agencies, ministries, research institutes and laboratories. Scientometrics includes the Journal of Research Communication Studies. Consequently its aims and scope cover that of the latter, namely, to bring the results of research investigations together in one place, in such a form that they will be of use not only to the investigators themselves but also to the entrepreneurs and research workers who form the object of these studies.
期刊最新文献
Through the secret gate: a study of member-contributed submissions in PNAS Breach of academic values and misconduct: the case of Sci-Hub Measuring the global and domestic technological impact of Chinese scientific output: a patent-to-paper citation analysis of science-technology linkage Evolving patterns of extreme publishing behavior across science Automated taxonomy alignment via large language models: bridging the gap between knowledge domains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1