Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Suicidal Ideation: Extending the Stepped Care Model

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1007/s10879-024-09639-5
Abdulmalik Fareeq Saber, Ahmed Ali, Hardi Abdulqadir Hasan, Sirwan Khalid Ahmed, Safin Hussein
{"title":"Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Suicidal Ideation: Extending the Stepped Care Model","authors":"Abdulmalik Fareeq Saber, Ahmed Ali, Hardi Abdulqadir Hasan, Sirwan Khalid Ahmed, Safin Hussein","doi":"10.1007/s10879-024-09639-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) demonstrates clear efficacy in addressing suicidal thoughts and behaviors. However, considerable barriers limit the accessibility of CBT interventions for those experiencing suicidal crises. As a solution to these limitations, a stepped care model is adapted which presents a stratified framework attuned to suicidal ideation severity that may expand access and optimize outcomes. Through four levels - basic, intermediate, advanced, critical - calibrated to match intensity of therapeutic support to patient risk profiles and clinical needs, the Stepped Care Model promotes efficient, responsive care. Basic levels focus on community education, crisis lines, screening to enable early intervention for mild cases; while critical levels feature emergency hospitalization and stabilization care plans for individuals facing severe, acute suicidality. Challenges include gaps in assessing suicide risk complicating level assignments, ethical complexities in involuntary interventions, workforce preparedness in terms of CBT and suicidology competencies, and promoting interdisciplinary coordination. Recommendations include specialized clinical training, localized adaptation within health systems, technological integration to bolster care continuity, and ongoing collection of patient outcomes data. Refining implementation guidance will support sites in transforming service delivery models to be more preemptive, patient-centered and evidence-based - contributing significantly to suicide prevention while maximizing scarce resources. Success requires balancing clinical responsiveness, practical feasibility and scientific rigor in this Stepped Care Model approach for one of healthcare’s most vulnerable populations. Therefore, the aim of this review article was to explore and review the considerations for successfully implementing a Stepped Care Model approach that is optimized for treating suicidal ideation and behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":46994,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-024-09639-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) demonstrates clear efficacy in addressing suicidal thoughts and behaviors. However, considerable barriers limit the accessibility of CBT interventions for those experiencing suicidal crises. As a solution to these limitations, a stepped care model is adapted which presents a stratified framework attuned to suicidal ideation severity that may expand access and optimize outcomes. Through four levels - basic, intermediate, advanced, critical - calibrated to match intensity of therapeutic support to patient risk profiles and clinical needs, the Stepped Care Model promotes efficient, responsive care. Basic levels focus on community education, crisis lines, screening to enable early intervention for mild cases; while critical levels feature emergency hospitalization and stabilization care plans for individuals facing severe, acute suicidality. Challenges include gaps in assessing suicide risk complicating level assignments, ethical complexities in involuntary interventions, workforce preparedness in terms of CBT and suicidology competencies, and promoting interdisciplinary coordination. Recommendations include specialized clinical training, localized adaptation within health systems, technological integration to bolster care continuity, and ongoing collection of patient outcomes data. Refining implementation guidance will support sites in transforming service delivery models to be more preemptive, patient-centered and evidence-based - contributing significantly to suicide prevention while maximizing scarce resources. Success requires balancing clinical responsiveness, practical feasibility and scientific rigor in this Stepped Care Model approach for one of healthcare’s most vulnerable populations. Therefore, the aim of this review article was to explore and review the considerations for successfully implementing a Stepped Care Model approach that is optimized for treating suicidal ideation and behaviors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知行为疗法治疗自杀意念:扩展阶梯护理模式
认知行为疗法(CBT)在解决自杀想法和行为方面具有明显的疗效。然而,对于那些经历过自杀危机的人来说,相当多的障碍限制了 CBT 干预的可及性。为了解决这些限制,我们采用了一种阶梯式护理模式,该模式根据自杀意念的严重程度提出了一个分层框架,可以扩大治疗范围并优化治疗效果。阶梯式护理模式分为基础、中级、高级和危重四个级别,根据患者的风险状况和临床需求调整治疗支持的强度,从而促进高效、有针对性的护理。基本级别侧重于社区教育、危机热线、筛查,以便对轻微病例进行早期干预;而重症级别则针对面临严重急性自杀问题的患者,提供紧急住院治疗和稳定护理计划。面临的挑战包括:评估自杀风险方面的差距导致级别分配复杂化、非自愿干预的伦理复杂性、劳动力在 CBT 和自杀学能力方面的准备情况,以及促进跨学科协调。建议包括提供专门的临床培训、在医疗系统内进行本地化调整、整合技术以加强护理的连续性,以及持续收集患者疗效数据。完善实施指南将支持医疗机构转变服务提供模式,使其更具有先发制人的能力、更以患者为中心、更以证据为基础,从而在最大限度地利用稀缺资源的同时,为预防自杀做出重大贡献。要想取得成功,就必须在这种针对医疗保健领域最脆弱人群之一的阶梯式护理模式方法的临床响应性、实际可行性和科学严谨性之间取得平衡。因此,本综述文章旨在探讨和回顾成功实施阶梯式护理模式方法的注意事项,该方法可优化自杀意念和行为的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy provides an international forum to critique the complexities and controversies facing psychotherapists. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed articles that critically analyze theory, research, or clinical practice. Empirical studies, panel discussions, essays, case studies, brief reports, and theoretical articles are published. Psychotherapists and clinical researchers will find this journal an important vehicle to review the problems of treating a variety of patients.
期刊最新文献
Transdiagnostic Emotion-Focused Therapy for Couples with Co-Morbid Relational and Mood, Anxiety and Related Difficulties An Integrative Model to Increase Client Motivation During the Psychotherapy Process Are Therapist Effects More Crucial than We Thought? The Timelessness of the Scar in the Borderline Personality Disorder BPD: A Systemic Intervention in a Case of Child Sexual Abuse The 7th Annual Psyche Awards: Honoring the Most Valuable Papers in Mental Health Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1