Preference for sons: still a trend? Evidence from individual-level data from Finland, 1960–2015

IF 4.1 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Review of Economics of the Household Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1007/s11150-024-09718-5
Krista Riukula
{"title":"Preference for sons: still a trend? Evidence from individual-level data from Finland, 1960–2015","authors":"Krista Riukula","doi":"10.1007/s11150-024-09718-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Preference for sons has been shown in various ways, but is it still up to date? I investigate how sex preference has evolved during the past 50 years using population-wide data from Finland. I find that having a first-born girl increases fertility and decreases the probability of being together with the child’s father in the 1960s to 1980s but not after the 1990s. Families with a first-born girl had 0.03 more children in the years 1960–1980. The effect decreases to an imprecise zero in the 1990s and to 0.007 fewer children in the 2000s. This shift occurs at the same time as the female and male employment rates approach each other. As the costs of raising a girl are not greater than those of raising a boy in Finland, the results suggest that the shift might be due to increased female bargaining power. Past literature has shown that females prefer girls over boys or are more neutral than males, who prefer having sons over daughters more often.</p>","PeriodicalId":47111,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economics of the Household","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economics of the Household","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-024-09718-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preference for sons has been shown in various ways, but is it still up to date? I investigate how sex preference has evolved during the past 50 years using population-wide data from Finland. I find that having a first-born girl increases fertility and decreases the probability of being together with the child’s father in the 1960s to 1980s but not after the 1990s. Families with a first-born girl had 0.03 more children in the years 1960–1980. The effect decreases to an imprecise zero in the 1990s and to 0.007 fewer children in the 2000s. This shift occurs at the same time as the female and male employment rates approach each other. As the costs of raising a girl are not greater than those of raising a boy in Finland, the results suggest that the shift might be due to increased female bargaining power. Past literature has shown that females prefer girls over boys or are more neutral than males, who prefer having sons over daughters more often.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重男轻女:仍是一种趋势?1960-2015年芬兰个人层面数据的证据
重男轻女的现象有多种表现形式,但这种现象是否依然存在?我利用芬兰的全人口数据研究了性别偏好在过去 50 年间是如何演变的。我发现,在 20 世纪 60 年代到 80 年代,头胎是女孩会提高生育率,降低与孩子父亲在一起的概率,但在 20 世纪 90 年代之后则不会。在 1960-1980 年间,头胎是女孩的家庭多生了 0.03 个孩子。到了 20 世纪 90 年代,这一影响下降为不精确的零,到了 2000 年代,孩子的数量减少为 0.007 个。这一变化发生在女性和男性就业率相互接近的同时。由于在芬兰养育女孩的成本并不比养育男孩的成本高,结果表明这种转变可能是由于女性议价能力的提高。过去的文献表明,女性更喜欢女孩而不是男孩,或者比男性更中立,因为男性更喜欢生儿子而不是女儿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The Review of Economics of the Household publishes high-quality empirical and theoretical research on the economic behavior and decision-making processes of single and multi-person households. The Review is not wedded to any particular models or methods. It welcomes both macro-economic and micro-level applications. Household decisions analyzed in this journal include ·         household production of human capital, health, nutrition/food, childcare, and eldercare, ·         well-being of persons living in households, issues of gender and power, ·         fertility and risky behaviors, ·         consumption, savings and wealth accumulation, ·         labor force participation and time use,·         household formation (including marriage, cohabitation and fertility) and dissolution,·         migration, intergenerational transfers,·         experiments involving households,·         religiosity and civility.The journal is particularly interested in policy-relevant economic analyses and equally interested in applications to countries at various levels of economic development. The Perspectives section covers articles on the history of economic thought and review articles. Officially cited as: Rev Econ Household
期刊最新文献
The heterogeneous effects of the first childbirth on women’s income Parental labor market penalties during two years of COVID-19 Commuting in dual-earner households: international gender differences with time use surveys Unemployment insurance generosity and intimate partner violence Bank Accounts for Minors: A Pathway to Financial Inclusion or a Dead-End?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1