(In)Voluntary Repatriation and Human Rights Violations of Kosovar Returnees

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Journal of Human Rights and Social Work Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1007/s41134-024-00315-1
Kaltrina Kusari
{"title":"(In)Voluntary Repatriation and Human Rights Violations of Kosovar Returnees","authors":"Kaltrina Kusari","doi":"10.1007/s41134-024-00315-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In January 2023, the European Commission presented a plan to increase the number of return migrants who return to countries outside the European Union (EU), after having fled their countries of origin due to war, political conflict, and the socio-economic consequences of such conflicts. This plan is supported by the EU and the UNHCR adoption of repatriation, or the right of displaced peoples to return to their country of origin, as the preferred solution to the migration crisis. This preference has been in effect since 1996, despite a significant body of research which substantiates that repatriation is not sustainable. To address the discrepancy between existing evidence and the adoption of repatriation as a sustainable solution, this study was grounded in a postcolonial and transnational feminist framework and used critical discourses analysis to explore the forced repatriation of Kosovars. Kosova offers an important case study on repatriation as it has one of the highest numbers of returnees per capita. In addition, considering that migration is a gendered process, this study included interviews with 15 return migrant women and 18 social service providers in Kosovo who support return migrants. Findings suggest that, contrary to the UNHCR assumption that repatriation is voluntary, most return migrant interviewees were forced to return, and many had their human rights violated during the return process. Interviews with service providers give insight into the dilemmas that social workers face when working with returnees whose rights have been violated. The article discusses the difficulties social workers in Kosova face when trying to uphold the social work commitment to social justice. Although centered on Kosovo, the study’s implications are important for social workers practicing anywhere, as practice with people who migrate is an increasing occurrence within social work, and we need to be better prepared to navigate the dilemmas we face.</p>","PeriodicalId":15919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Rights and Social Work","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Rights and Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-024-00315-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In January 2023, the European Commission presented a plan to increase the number of return migrants who return to countries outside the European Union (EU), after having fled their countries of origin due to war, political conflict, and the socio-economic consequences of such conflicts. This plan is supported by the EU and the UNHCR adoption of repatriation, or the right of displaced peoples to return to their country of origin, as the preferred solution to the migration crisis. This preference has been in effect since 1996, despite a significant body of research which substantiates that repatriation is not sustainable. To address the discrepancy between existing evidence and the adoption of repatriation as a sustainable solution, this study was grounded in a postcolonial and transnational feminist framework and used critical discourses analysis to explore the forced repatriation of Kosovars. Kosova offers an important case study on repatriation as it has one of the highest numbers of returnees per capita. In addition, considering that migration is a gendered process, this study included interviews with 15 return migrant women and 18 social service providers in Kosovo who support return migrants. Findings suggest that, contrary to the UNHCR assumption that repatriation is voluntary, most return migrant interviewees were forced to return, and many had their human rights violated during the return process. Interviews with service providers give insight into the dilemmas that social workers face when working with returnees whose rights have been violated. The article discusses the difficulties social workers in Kosova face when trying to uphold the social work commitment to social justice. Although centered on Kosovo, the study’s implications are important for social workers practicing anywhere, as practice with people who migrate is an increasing occurrence within social work, and we need to be better prepared to navigate the dilemmas we face.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(科索沃回返者的(非)自愿遣返和侵犯人权行为
2023 年 1 月,欧盟委员会提出了一项计划,以增加因战争、政治冲突和这些冲突的社会经济后果而逃离原籍国后返回欧盟(EU)以外国家的回返移民人数。欧盟和联合国难民署支持这一计划,将遣返或流离失所者返回原籍国的权利作为解决移民危机的首选方案。尽管大量研究证实遣返是不可持续的,但这一优先选择自 1996 年以来一直有效。为了解决现有证据与将遣返作为可持续解决方案之间的差异,本研究立足于后殖民和跨国女权主义框架,使用批判性话语分析来探讨科索沃人的强制遣返问题。科索沃是人均遣返人数最多的国家之一,因此它提供了一个重要的遣返案例研究。此外,考虑到移民是一个有性别区分的过程,本研究还采访了 15 名回国移民妇女和 18 名在科索沃为回国移民提供支持的社会服务提供者。研究结果表明,与难民署关于遣返是自愿的假设相反,大多数受访的回返移民都是被迫回返的,许多人的人权在回返过程中受到了侵犯。通过对服务提供者的访谈,我们了解到社会工作者在与权利受到侵犯的回返者合作时所面临的困境。文章讨论了科索沃的社会工作者在努力维护社会工作对社会正义的承诺时所面临的困难。虽然研究以科索沃为中心,但研究的意义对任何地方的社会工作者都很重要,因为在社会工作中,与移徙者打交道的情况越来越多,我们需要做好更充分的准备来应对所面临的困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: This journal offers an outlet for articles that support social work as a human rights profession. It brings together knowledge about addressing human rights in practice, research, policy, and advocacy as well as teaching about human rights from around the globe. Articles explore the history of social work as a human rights profession; familiarize participants on how to advance human rights using the human rights documents from the United Nations; present the types of monitoring and assessment that takes place internationally and within the U.S.; demonstrate rights-based practice approaches and techniques; and facilitate discussion of the implications of human rights tools and the framework for social work practice.
期刊最新文献
Child Marriage and Domestic Violence Among Syrian Refugee Girls in Domiz Camp Kurdistan-Iraq Social Support and Familial Relationships for the Well-being of Older Adults in Nigeria Amidst COVID-19 Social Work and Support for Climate-Related Indigenous Migrants from South America Transnational Solidarity in Rough Times: Documenting and Engaging for Peace Social Work in a Post-war Dystopia: A Case Study of Bosnia and Herzegovina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1