Enhancing the requirements engineering of configurable systems by the ongoing use of variability models

IF 2.1 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Requirements Engineering Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1007/s00766-024-00421-6
Chin Khor, Robyn R. Lutz
{"title":"Enhancing the requirements engineering of configurable systems by the ongoing use of variability models","authors":"Chin Khor, Robyn R. Lutz","doi":"10.1007/s00766-024-00421-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Software systems and product lines often use configurable features to specify a portfolio of product variants from a common core. Typically, their requirements also include constraints on which combinations of features are valid. Especially for larger systems and systems where the specifications are scattered among documents, the analysis of a new product’s variability-related requirements is challenging. To address this, we introduce a scalable, tool-supported framework that uses a variability model to automate checks for missing and inconsistent features and constraints. Our approach also extends and scales traditional variability requirements engineering by incorporating combinatorial interaction testing techniques to build valid product variants covering all configurations in the variability model and to automatically discover faulty feature settings in failed builds. Results from evaluation on two configurable systems show that our framework is effective both at early detection of missing, incorrect, and inconsistent variability requirements and at later finding faulty feature configurations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20912,"journal":{"name":"Requirements Engineering","volume":"175 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Requirements Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-024-00421-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Software systems and product lines often use configurable features to specify a portfolio of product variants from a common core. Typically, their requirements also include constraints on which combinations of features are valid. Especially for larger systems and systems where the specifications are scattered among documents, the analysis of a new product’s variability-related requirements is challenging. To address this, we introduce a scalable, tool-supported framework that uses a variability model to automate checks for missing and inconsistent features and constraints. Our approach also extends and scales traditional variability requirements engineering by incorporating combinatorial interaction testing techniques to build valid product variants covering all configurations in the variability model and to automatically discover faulty feature settings in failed builds. Results from evaluation on two configurable systems show that our framework is effective both at early detection of missing, incorrect, and inconsistent variability requirements and at later finding faulty feature configurations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续使用可变性模型,加强可配置系统的需求工程设计
软件系统和产品线通常使用可配置功能来指定一个共同核心的产品变体组合。通常,它们的需求还包括对哪些功能组合有效的限制。特别是对于较大的系统和规范分散在不同文档中的系统,分析新产品的可变性相关要求具有挑战性。为了解决这个问题,我们引入了一个可扩展的工具支持框架,该框架使用可变性模型来自动检查缺失和不一致的特征和约束。我们的方法还扩展和扩展了传统的可变性需求工程,通过结合组合交互测试技术来构建有效的产品变体,涵盖可变性模型中的所有配置,并在失败的构建中自动发现错误的功能设置。对两个可配置系统的评估结果表明,我们的框架在早期检测缺失、不正确和不一致的可变性需求以及后期发现错误的功能配置方面都很有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Requirements Engineering
Requirements Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal provides a focus for the dissemination of new results about the elicitation, representation and validation of requirements of software intensive information systems or applications. Theoretical and applied submissions are welcome, but all papers must explicitly address: -the practical consequences of the ideas for the design of complex systems -how the ideas should be evaluated by the reflective practitioner The journal is motivated by a multi-disciplinary view that considers requirements not only in terms of software components specification but also in terms of activities for their elicitation, representation and agreement, carried out within an organisational and social context. To this end, contributions are sought from fields such as software engineering, information systems, occupational sociology, cognitive and organisational psychology, human-computer interaction, computer-supported cooperative work, linguistics and philosophy for work addressing specifically requirements engineering issues.
期刊最新文献
New product development based on non-functional requirements in renewable energy industries using hesitant fuzzy QFD-DFX approach Recommending and release planning of user-driven functionality deletion for mobile apps Benchmarking requirement template systems: comparing appropriateness, usability, and expressiveness A natural language-based method to specify privacy requirements: an evaluation with practitioners Navigating personalized medication: unveiling user needs to forge a cutting-edge platform for proactive prevention and monitoring of adverse drug reactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1