{"title":"The Dissolution and Reemergence of the Public University Amid Changing State-University Relationships: The Chilean Case","authors":"Carolina Guzmán-Valenzuela, Ronald Barnett","doi":"10.1057/s41307-024-00366-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines two under-researched aspects of the public university, that of its relationship with the state, and with private universities. Chile, the case study here, possesses both public and private sectors of higher education, and has witnessed an intense debate over what it is to be a public university. The research focuses on a publicly documented government-sponsored debate. Three discourses are identified, turning on participants’ views of the responsibilities of the state and the universities. The category of ‘public’ is seen to be fluid, attaching both to public—or state-owned—universities and to private universities. The conclusions are that, in a hybrid university system (of the Chilean kind), a university’s publicness may be depicted as a profile of orientations and aspects and is no longer being confined solely to ‘public universities’: private universities are being seen as possessing public features. As an institution with a definite identity towards the state and society, what has been understood as the public university is in process of dissolution. It is, nevertheless, a situation that is opening new possibilities for what it is to be a public university both as institution and as idea.</p>","PeriodicalId":47327,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Policy","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Policy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-024-00366-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper examines two under-researched aspects of the public university, that of its relationship with the state, and with private universities. Chile, the case study here, possesses both public and private sectors of higher education, and has witnessed an intense debate over what it is to be a public university. The research focuses on a publicly documented government-sponsored debate. Three discourses are identified, turning on participants’ views of the responsibilities of the state and the universities. The category of ‘public’ is seen to be fluid, attaching both to public—or state-owned—universities and to private universities. The conclusions are that, in a hybrid university system (of the Chilean kind), a university’s publicness may be depicted as a profile of orientations and aspects and is no longer being confined solely to ‘public universities’: private universities are being seen as possessing public features. As an institution with a definite identity towards the state and society, what has been understood as the public university is in process of dissolution. It is, nevertheless, a situation that is opening new possibilities for what it is to be a public university both as institution and as idea.
期刊介绍:
Higher Education Policy is an international peer-reviewed and SSCI-indexed academic journal focusing on higher education policy in a broad sense. The journal considers submissions that discuss national and supra-national higher education policies and/or analyse their impacts on higher education institutions or the academic community: leadership, faculty, staff and students, but also considers papers that deal with governance and policy issues at the level of higher education institutions. Critical analyses, empirical investigations (either qualitative or quantitative), and theoretical-conceptual contributions are equally welcome, but for all submissions the requirement is that papers be embedded in the relevant academic literature and contribute to furthering our understanding of policy.
The journal has a preference for papers that are written from a disciplinary or interdisciplinary perspective. In the past, contributors have relied on perspectives from public administration, political science, sociology, history, economics and law, but also from philosophy, psychology and anthropology. Articles devoted to systems of higher education that are less well-known or less often analysed are particularly welcome.
Given the international scope of the journal, articles should be written for and be understood by an international audience, consisting of researchers in higher education, disciplinary researchers, and policy-makers, administrators, managers and practitioners in higher education. Contributions should not normally exceed 7,000 words (excluding references). Peer reviewAll submissions to the journal will undergo rigorous peer review (anonymous referees) after an initial editorial screening on quality and fit with the journal''s aims.Special issues
The journal welcomes proposals for special issues. The journal archive contains several examples of special issues. Such proposals, to be sent to the editor, should set out the theme of the special issue and include the names of the (proposed) contributors and summaries of the envisaged contributions. Forum section
Occasionally, the journal publishes contributions – in its Forum section – based on personal viewpoints and/or experiences with the intent to stimulate discussion and reflection, or to challenge established thinking in the field of higher education.