The Conceptual Replication of Crianza Positiva E-Messaging Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Too Much or Too Little Information?

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Family and Economic Issues Pub Date : 2024-06-29 DOI:10.1007/s10834-024-09975-7
Ana Balsa, Juanita Bloomfield, Alejandro Cid
{"title":"The Conceptual Replication of Crianza Positiva E-Messaging Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Too Much or Too Little Information?","authors":"Ana Balsa, Juanita Bloomfield, Alejandro Cid","doi":"10.1007/s10834-024-09975-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article evaluates the conceptual replication of a text and audio Behavioral Change Communication Program (Crianza Positiva) on parenting practices and well-being in households with children aged 0–2 years in Uruguay during the COVID-19 pandemic. The intervention uses behavioral economics tools to reorient parents’ attention towards positive parenting practices. Using an experimental design involving 39 early childhood centers (687 families), we find no effects of the intervention on the outcomes of interest. This finding contrasts with those found in a previous edition of the program in 2018, which showed improvements in parental involvement, in the quality of parent–child interaction, and in adult–child language patterns (Balsa in Child &amp; Youth Care Forum 53:1–22, 2023a; Balsa in Behavioural Public Policy 7: 607–643, 2023c; Bloomfield in Review of the Economics of the Household 21:95–130, 2023). We consider various hypotheses behind the lack of results, which in turn point to key issues to consider when designing similar programs. First, these messaging programs may work as a complement to more intensive interventions, but may have limited impact when implemented in isolation. Unlike the 2018 messages, which were sent after an 8-session face-to-face workshop, the new edition was implemented without a previous workshop. Second, the problems introduced by the pandemic increased families’ stress, time and space constraints, potentially reducing family’s receptivity to the messages. Indeed, we find suggestive evidence that the messages increased parental stress or depressive symptoms in adults facing household overcrowding. In addition, early childhood centers actively used WhatsApp messages to stay in touch with families during the pandemic, competing for the attention of the families. Finally, the 2020 sample had a higher prevalence of more educated mothers, who may be less responsive to these types of interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":39675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family and Economic Issues","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-024-09975-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article evaluates the conceptual replication of a text and audio Behavioral Change Communication Program (Crianza Positiva) on parenting practices and well-being in households with children aged 0–2 years in Uruguay during the COVID-19 pandemic. The intervention uses behavioral economics tools to reorient parents’ attention towards positive parenting practices. Using an experimental design involving 39 early childhood centers (687 families), we find no effects of the intervention on the outcomes of interest. This finding contrasts with those found in a previous edition of the program in 2018, which showed improvements in parental involvement, in the quality of parent–child interaction, and in adult–child language patterns (Balsa in Child & Youth Care Forum 53:1–22, 2023a; Balsa in Behavioural Public Policy 7: 607–643, 2023c; Bloomfield in Review of the Economics of the Household 21:95–130, 2023). We consider various hypotheses behind the lack of results, which in turn point to key issues to consider when designing similar programs. First, these messaging programs may work as a complement to more intensive interventions, but may have limited impact when implemented in isolation. Unlike the 2018 messages, which were sent after an 8-session face-to-face workshop, the new edition was implemented without a previous workshop. Second, the problems introduced by the pandemic increased families’ stress, time and space constraints, potentially reducing family’s receptivity to the messages. Indeed, we find suggestive evidence that the messages increased parental stress or depressive symptoms in adults facing household overcrowding. In addition, early childhood centers actively used WhatsApp messages to stay in touch with families during the pandemic, competing for the attention of the families. Finally, the 2020 sample had a higher prevalence of more educated mothers, who may be less responsive to these types of interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间 Crianza Positiva 电子信息计划的概念复制:信息太多还是太少?
本文评估了在 COVID-19 大流行期间,乌拉圭针对有 0-2 岁儿童家庭的育儿方式和幸福感的文字和音频行为改变沟通计划(Crianza Positiva)的概念复制情况。这项干预措施利用行为经济学工具,重新引导父母关注积极的养育方式。通过对 39 个幼儿中心(687 个家庭)进行实验设计,我们发现干预措施对相关结果没有影响。这一结果与 2018 年上一版计划的结果形成了鲜明对比,上一版计划显示,家长参与度、亲子互动质量以及成人-儿童语言模式均有所改善(Balsa 载于《儿童与amp; 青少年护理论坛》53:1-22, 2023a;Balsa 载于《行为公共政策》7: 607-643, 2023c;Bloomfield 载于《家庭经济学评论》21:95-130, 2023)。我们考虑了缺乏结果背后的各种假设,进而指出了在设计类似项目时需要考虑的关键问题。首先,这些信息计划可能是对更深入的干预措施的补充,但如果单独实施,其影响可能有限。与 2018 年的信息不同,新版信息是在举办了 8 次面对面研讨会后发送的,而新版信息是在没有举办研讨会的情况下实施的。其次,大流行带来的问题增加了家庭的压力、时间和空间限制,可能会降低家庭对信息的接受度。事实上,我们发现有暗示性证据表明,在面临家庭拥挤的成年人中,信息增加了父母的压力或抑郁症状。此外,在大流行期间,幼儿中心积极使用 WhatsApp 消息与家庭保持联系,争夺家庭的注意力。最后,2020 年样本中受教育程度较高的母亲比例较高,她们对这类干预措施的反应可能较弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Family and Economic Issues
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Journal of Family and Economic Issues is an interdisciplinary publication that explores the intricate relationship between the family and its economic environment. Peer-reviewed contributions address important issues in family management, household labor and productivity, relationships between economic and non-economic issues including health and healthcare, as well as interrelations between external settings and family life, including family policy, work, and community. The journal features the following types of submissions: original research, critical reviews, brief communications, invited letters to the editor, and reviews of significant books on the field.
期刊最新文献
Gendered Relationship of Childbearing with Earnings Accumulated by Midlife in Two Nordic Welfare States German Parents Attaining Intrapersonal Work-Family Balance While Implementing the 50/50-Split-Model with Their Partners Hide and Seek with Finances: Financial Infidelity and Financial Snooping in Relationships Status Seeking and Work-Family Conflicts: How the Pursuit of Wealth and Success Threatens Family Peace in 26 Countries The Will to Sustain Through Shocks, Wars and Crises: How the History of a Country Influences the Behaviour of the Family CEO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1