Olfactory training using nasal inserts more effective due to increased adherence

Anja L Winter, Sofie Henecke, Evelina Thunell, Mattias Swartz, Joakim Martinsen, Pernilla Sahlstrand Johansson, Johan N Lundstrom
{"title":"Olfactory training using nasal inserts more effective due to increased adherence","authors":"Anja L Winter, Sofie Henecke, Evelina Thunell, Mattias Swartz, Joakim Martinsen, Pernilla Sahlstrand Johansson, Johan N Lundstrom","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.26.24309521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recommended treatment for hyposmia (clinically reduced sense of smell) is olfactory training using odors in containers that the patients smell twice a day for several weeks. Adherence to the olfactory training regimen is, however, generally low. We aimed to investigate if a new form of olfactory delivery via scented nasal inserts could enhance olfactory training adherence by allowing participants to be mobile while performing the training and thereby lower perceived intrusion in their everyday life, using a randomized controlled parallel-group design. Two groups of individuals with hyposmia underwent 8 weeks of olfactory training. One group (n=60) performed olfactory training using scented nasal inserts (nasal plugs that retain nasal patency) and one group (n=56) performed the standard care regiment currently recommended by the Swedish healthcare system. We assessed objective and subjective olfactory ability before and after olfactory training as well as adherence to training. While both groups significantly improved their objective and subjective olfactory abilities, training with nasal insert produced similar improvement as standard care in overall treatment outcome. However, there was a significantly greater increase in discrimination performance and lower dropout rate (6.7%) in the nasal insert compared to the standard care group (23.2%). Critically, the nasal insert group had a significantly higher adherence to the training regimen, i.e. fewer missed training sessions. In addition, they reported overall greater satisfaction with their treatment. These data suggest that olfactory training with nasal inserts could serve as a more effective form of treatment for hyposmia, due to patients improved adherence to protocol and increased tendency to finish their treatment regimen.","PeriodicalId":501185,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Otolaryngology","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.26.24309521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recommended treatment for hyposmia (clinically reduced sense of smell) is olfactory training using odors in containers that the patients smell twice a day for several weeks. Adherence to the olfactory training regimen is, however, generally low. We aimed to investigate if a new form of olfactory delivery via scented nasal inserts could enhance olfactory training adherence by allowing participants to be mobile while performing the training and thereby lower perceived intrusion in their everyday life, using a randomized controlled parallel-group design. Two groups of individuals with hyposmia underwent 8 weeks of olfactory training. One group (n=60) performed olfactory training using scented nasal inserts (nasal plugs that retain nasal patency) and one group (n=56) performed the standard care regiment currently recommended by the Swedish healthcare system. We assessed objective and subjective olfactory ability before and after olfactory training as well as adherence to training. While both groups significantly improved their objective and subjective olfactory abilities, training with nasal insert produced similar improvement as standard care in overall treatment outcome. However, there was a significantly greater increase in discrimination performance and lower dropout rate (6.7%) in the nasal insert compared to the standard care group (23.2%). Critically, the nasal insert group had a significantly higher adherence to the training regimen, i.e. fewer missed training sessions. In addition, they reported overall greater satisfaction with their treatment. These data suggest that olfactory training with nasal inserts could serve as a more effective form of treatment for hyposmia, due to patients improved adherence to protocol and increased tendency to finish their treatment regimen.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由于坚持率提高,使用鼻塞进行嗅觉训练更有效
治疗嗅觉减退(临床上的嗅觉减退)的推荐方法是进行嗅觉训练,使用容器中的气味,让患者每天闻两次,持续数周。然而,嗅觉训练的坚持率通常很低。我们的目的是采用随机对照平行组设计,研究通过鼻腔插片提供气味的新形式是否能提高嗅觉训练的依从性,让参与者在进行训练时可以移动,从而降低对其日常生活的干扰。两组嗅觉减退者接受了为期 8 周的嗅觉训练。一组(人数=60)使用香味鼻塞(保持鼻腔通畅的鼻塞)进行嗅觉训练,另一组(人数=56)按照瑞典医疗系统目前推荐的标准护理方案进行训练。我们对嗅觉训练前后的客观和主观嗅觉能力以及训练的坚持情况进行了评估。虽然两组患者的客观和主观嗅觉能力都得到了明显改善,但在总体治疗效果方面,使用鼻腔插入物进行训练所取得的改善效果与标准护理相似。不过,与标准护理组(23.2%)相比,鼻塞组的辨别能力明显提高,辍学率(6.7%)也更低。重要的是,鼻塞组对训练方案的坚持率明显更高,即错过训练课程的人数更少。此外,他们对治疗的总体满意度也更高。这些数据表明,使用鼻塞进行嗅觉训练可作为治疗嗅觉减退的一种更有效的方法,因为患者对训练方案的依从性提高了,而且更倾向于完成治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing a virtual Endoscopic Surgery Planning system to optimize surgical outcomes Age distribution characteristics of 1915 cases of otitis media with effusion in children Effectiveness of bimodal neuromodulation for tinnitus treatment in a real-world clinical setting in United States: A retrospective chart review Comparison of ChatGPT and Gemini as sources of references in otorhinolaryngology AIR-CONDUCTION AND BONE-CONDUCTION REFERENCE THRESHOLD LEVELS: A MULTICENTER STUDY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1