Anyu Jiang, Cassandra Acebal, Brook Heyd, Trustin White, Gurleen Kainth, Arunashish Datta, Shreyas Sen, Adam Khalifa, Baibhab Chatterjee
{"title":"Implant-to-Wearable Communication through the Human Body: Exploring the Effects of Encapsulated Capacitive and Galvanic Transmitters","authors":"Anyu Jiang, Cassandra Acebal, Brook Heyd, Trustin White, Gurleen Kainth, Arunashish Datta, Shreyas Sen, Adam Khalifa, Baibhab Chatterjee","doi":"arxiv-2406.13141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data transfer using human-body communication (HBC) represents an actively\nexplored alternative solution to address the challenges related to\nenergy-efficiency, tissue absorption, and security of conventional wireless.\nAlthough the use of HBC for wearable-to-wearable communication has been\nwell-explored, different configurations for the transmitter (Tx) and receiver\n(Rx) for implant-to-wearable HBC needs further studies. This paper\nsubstantiates the hypothesis that a fully implanted galvanic Tx is more\nefficient than a capacitive Tx for interaction with a wearable Rx. Given the\npractical limitations of implanting an ideal capacitive device, we choose a\ngalvanic device with one electrode encapsulated to model the capacitive\nscenario. We analyze the lumped circuit model for in-body to out-of-body\ncommunication, and perform Circuit-based as well as Finite Element Method (FEM)\nsimulations to explore how the encapsulation thickness affects the received\nsignal levels. We demonstrate in-vivo experimental results on live Sprague\nDawley rats to validate the hypothesis, and show that compared to the galvanic\nTx, the channel loss will be $\\approx$ 20 dB higher with each additional mm\nthickness of capacitive encapsulation, eventually going below the noise floor\nfor ideal capacitive Tx.","PeriodicalId":501572,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Tissues and Organs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2406.13141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Data transfer using human-body communication (HBC) represents an actively
explored alternative solution to address the challenges related to
energy-efficiency, tissue absorption, and security of conventional wireless.
Although the use of HBC for wearable-to-wearable communication has been
well-explored, different configurations for the transmitter (Tx) and receiver
(Rx) for implant-to-wearable HBC needs further studies. This paper
substantiates the hypothesis that a fully implanted galvanic Tx is more
efficient than a capacitive Tx for interaction with a wearable Rx. Given the
practical limitations of implanting an ideal capacitive device, we choose a
galvanic device with one electrode encapsulated to model the capacitive
scenario. We analyze the lumped circuit model for in-body to out-of-body
communication, and perform Circuit-based as well as Finite Element Method (FEM)
simulations to explore how the encapsulation thickness affects the received
signal levels. We demonstrate in-vivo experimental results on live Sprague
Dawley rats to validate the hypothesis, and show that compared to the galvanic
Tx, the channel loss will be $\approx$ 20 dB higher with each additional mm
thickness of capacitive encapsulation, eventually going below the noise floor
for ideal capacitive Tx.