A literature review: Mathematics vocabulary intervention for students with mathematics difficulty

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH School Science and Mathematics Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1111/ssm.12684
Danielle O. Lariviere, Tessa L. Arsenault, S. Blair Payne
{"title":"A literature review: Mathematics vocabulary intervention for students with mathematics difficulty","authors":"Danielle O. Lariviere, Tessa L. Arsenault, S. Blair Payne","doi":"10.1111/ssm.12684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper details a literature review of mathematics vocabulary intervention studies for students with mathematics difficulty. The primary aim was to identify instructional practices that support mathematics vocabulary development. We conducted a database search to identify mathematics intervention studies either focused exclusively on vocabulary or with an embedded vocabulary component. Ultimately, 13 studies with participants from kindergarten to Grade 8 were included in the review. The majority of included studies had dual foci on vocabulary and other mathematics content, including whole number computation, word problem solving, fractions, algebra, or geometry. All studies that measured mathematics vocabulary performance indicated positive student outcomes. In addition, multiple studies indicated positive effects on measures of other mathematics content beyond mathematics vocabulary knowledge. We noted six instructional practices across studies that bolstered the mathematics vocabulary performance of students with mathematics difficulty. From most to least common, these practices included formal vocabulary use, explicit instruction, use of representations, repeated exposures, pre‐teaching, and graphic organizers. Implications are addressed for both researchers and practitioners.","PeriodicalId":47540,"journal":{"name":"School Science and Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Science and Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper details a literature review of mathematics vocabulary intervention studies for students with mathematics difficulty. The primary aim was to identify instructional practices that support mathematics vocabulary development. We conducted a database search to identify mathematics intervention studies either focused exclusively on vocabulary or with an embedded vocabulary component. Ultimately, 13 studies with participants from kindergarten to Grade 8 were included in the review. The majority of included studies had dual foci on vocabulary and other mathematics content, including whole number computation, word problem solving, fractions, algebra, or geometry. All studies that measured mathematics vocabulary performance indicated positive student outcomes. In addition, multiple studies indicated positive effects on measures of other mathematics content beyond mathematics vocabulary knowledge. We noted six instructional practices across studies that bolstered the mathematics vocabulary performance of students with mathematics difficulty. From most to least common, these practices included formal vocabulary use, explicit instruction, use of representations, repeated exposures, pre‐teaching, and graphic organizers. Implications are addressed for both researchers and practitioners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文献综述:对数学困难学生进行数学词汇干预
本文详细介绍了针对数学困难学生的数学词汇干预研究的文献综述。主要目的是确定支持数学词汇发展的教学实践。我们进行了数据库搜索,以确定专门针对词汇或包含词汇内容的数学干预研究。最终,13 项涉及幼儿园至八年级学生的研究被纳入审查范围。所纳入的大多数研究都同时关注词汇和其他数学内容,包括整数计算、文字问题解决、分数、代数或几何。所有测量数学词汇成绩的研究都表明,学生的学习效果良好。此外,多项研究表明,除数学词汇知识外,对其他数学内容的测量也有积极影响。我们注意到,在各项研究中,有六种教学方法提高了有数学困难的学生的数学词汇成绩。从最常见到最不常见,这些做法包括正式词汇使用、明确教学、使用表征、反复接触、预习和图形组织器。本文探讨了这些做法对研究者和实践者的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
School Science and Mathematics
School Science and Mathematics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Impacting elementary STEM teacher leadership identities Fostering students' inquiry aptitudes and collaborative reasoning in higher education science courses with social annotation tools and collaborative platforms Re‐imagining professional learning communities in education: Placing teacher leadership in STEM context Support for collective argumentation in integrated STEM: A study of elementary teachers' practice What does a scientist look like? Children's perceptions of scientist gender and skin tone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1