Experimental and numerical studies on CO2 injectivity in low permeability oil reservoirs

IF 2 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Frontiers in Earth Science Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.3389/feart.2024.1418087
Fankun Meng, Lin Cao, Yuhui Zhou, Botao Liu, Chengyue Wen, Jia Liu
{"title":"Experimental and numerical studies on CO2 injectivity in low permeability oil reservoirs","authors":"Fankun Meng, Lin Cao, Yuhui Zhou, Botao Liu, Chengyue Wen, Jia Liu","doi":"10.3389/feart.2024.1418087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Contrary to the traditional recognition that CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> has large injectivity (the ratio of CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> injection volume to pressure drop) in low permeability oil reservoirs to keep the formation pressure at a high level, the CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> injection rate usually cannot attain the set value. It is essential to study the factors that influence CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> injectivity and propose the optimal strategies to improve the CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> injectivity.Methods: Therefore, in this study, several core samples collected from low permeability oil reservoirs are used to experimentally investigate the influences of CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> injection rate, formation permeability, pressure and water saturation on CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> injectivity, and the corresponding pressure drop, oil and gas production are examined. To determine the primary factor that influences the CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> injectivity, orthogonal experimental design (ODE) and numerical simulations are utilized. In addition, to improve CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> injectivity, the techniques of mini-fracturing and radial perforation are presented, and the threshold values for these two parameters are determined.Result and discussion: The results demonstrate that according to the magnitude of the extent that influences CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> injectivity, the rank for the above factors is CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> injection rate, reservoir pressure, formation water saturation and permeability. The oil recovery is mainly influenced by CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> injection rate and formation permeability, and the influences of reservoir pressure and water saturation on oil recovery are smaller. The threshold values for radial perforation and fracture half-length are 25 m and 50m, respectively, which can provide some guidance for the strategies that should be taken to improve the CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> injectivity and recover more oil from low permeability oil reservoirs.","PeriodicalId":12359,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Earth Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Earth Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1418087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Contrary to the traditional recognition that CO2 has large injectivity (the ratio of CO2 injection volume to pressure drop) in low permeability oil reservoirs to keep the formation pressure at a high level, the CO2 injection rate usually cannot attain the set value. It is essential to study the factors that influence CO2 injectivity and propose the optimal strategies to improve the CO2 injectivity.Methods: Therefore, in this study, several core samples collected from low permeability oil reservoirs are used to experimentally investigate the influences of CO2 injection rate, formation permeability, pressure and water saturation on CO2 injectivity, and the corresponding pressure drop, oil and gas production are examined. To determine the primary factor that influences the CO2 injectivity, orthogonal experimental design (ODE) and numerical simulations are utilized. In addition, to improve CO2 injectivity, the techniques of mini-fracturing and radial perforation are presented, and the threshold values for these two parameters are determined.Result and discussion: The results demonstrate that according to the magnitude of the extent that influences CO2 injectivity, the rank for the above factors is CO2 injection rate, reservoir pressure, formation water saturation and permeability. The oil recovery is mainly influenced by CO2 injection rate and formation permeability, and the influences of reservoir pressure and water saturation on oil recovery are smaller. The threshold values for radial perforation and fracture half-length are 25 m and 50m, respectively, which can provide some guidance for the strategies that should be taken to improve the CO2 injectivity and recover more oil from low permeability oil reservoirs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低渗透油藏二氧化碳注入率的实验和数值研究
导言:传统认识认为,在低渗透油藏中,二氧化碳具有较大的注入率(二氧化碳注入量与压降之比),可使地层压力保持在较高水平,但与之相反,二氧化碳注入率通常无法达到设定值。研究影响二氧化碳注入率的因素并提出提高二氧化碳注入率的最佳策略至关重要:因此,本研究利用从低渗透油藏采集的几个岩心样本,实验研究了二氧化碳注入率、地层渗透率、压力和水饱和度对二氧化碳注入率的影响,并考察了相应的压降和油气产量。为确定影响二氧化碳注入率的主要因素,采用了正交实验设计(ODE)和数值模拟。此外,还介绍了提高二氧化碳注入率的微型压裂和径向射孔技术,并确定了这两个参数的临界值:结果表明,根据影响二氧化碳注入率的程度大小,上述因素的排序依次为二氧化碳注入率、储层压力、地层水饱和度和渗透率。采油率主要受 CO2 注入率和地层渗透率的影响,储层压力和含水饱和度对采油率的影响较小。径向射孔临界值和裂缝半长临界值分别为 25 米和 50 米,这可以为提高低渗透油藏的二氧化碳注入率和提高采油率提供一定的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Earth Science
Frontiers in Earth Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
2076
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Earth Science is an open-access journal that aims to bring together and publish on a single platform the best research dedicated to our planet. This platform hosts the rapidly growing and continuously expanding domains in Earth Science, involving the lithosphere (including the geosciences spectrum), the hydrosphere (including marine geosciences and hydrology, complementing the existing Frontiers journal on Marine Science) and the atmosphere (including meteorology and climatology). As such, Frontiers in Earth Science focuses on the countless processes operating within and among the major spheres constituting our planet. In turn, the understanding of these processes provides the theoretical background to better use the available resources and to face the major environmental challenges (including earthquakes, tsunamis, eruptions, floods, landslides, climate changes, extreme meteorological events): this is where interdependent processes meet, requiring a holistic view to better live on and with our planet. The journal welcomes outstanding contributions in any domain of Earth Science. The open-access model developed by Frontiers offers a fast, efficient, timely and dynamic alternative to traditional publication formats. The journal has 20 specialty sections at the first tier, each acting as an independent journal with a full editorial board. The traditional peer-review process is adapted to guarantee fairness and efficiency using a thorough paperless process, with real-time author-reviewer-editor interactions, collaborative reviewer mandates to maximize quality, and reviewer disclosure after article acceptance. While maintaining a rigorous peer-review, this system allows for a process whereby accepted articles are published online on average 90 days after submission. General Commentary articles as well as Book Reviews in Frontiers in Earth Science are only accepted upon invitation.
期刊最新文献
Study on InSAR deformation information extraction and stress state assessment in a railway tunnel in a plateau area Influence of the sedimentary environment of the Wufeng-Longmaxi shale on organic matter accumulation in the Dingshan area, Sichuan Basin Multifactor-coupled study on freeze-thaw forces of rocks in cold regions Maximising the value of hyperspectral drill core scanning through real-time processing and analysis Converged ensemble simulations of climate: possible trends in total solar irradiance cannot explain global warming alone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1