Comparative Analysis of Algebraic Models of Laminar-Turbulent Transition

A. S. Stabnikov, A. V. Garbaruk, A. A. Matyushenko
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Algebraic Models of Laminar-Turbulent Transition","authors":"A. S. Stabnikov, A. V. Garbaruk, A. A. Matyushenko","doi":"10.1134/s2070048224700091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>This paper presents the results of extensive testing of four recently proposed algebraic laminar-turbulent transition (LTT) models, which are significantly more computationally effective than differential models, while being potentially equally accurate. The models chosen for evaluation, namely, SST KD, SST kγ, SST alg-γ, and SA BCM, are implemented in the in-house code NTS and verified by comparing the obtained results with those published by the models’ authors. The experimental database used for the evaluation of the models includes transitional boundary layers at different free-flow turbulence intensities with and without the pressure gradient, four airfoil flows with different LTT scenarios, and a tandem of two airfoils. It is found that at low levels of turbulence, the results of the SA BCM and SST kγ models may depend on the initial approximation, which does not allow them to be recommended for engineering applications. The best results, comparable in accuracy to those of differential models, are obtained using the SST alg-γ model.</p>","PeriodicalId":38050,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s2070048224700091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the results of extensive testing of four recently proposed algebraic laminar-turbulent transition (LTT) models, which are significantly more computationally effective than differential models, while being potentially equally accurate. The models chosen for evaluation, namely, SST KD, SST kγ, SST alg-γ, and SA BCM, are implemented in the in-house code NTS and verified by comparing the obtained results with those published by the models’ authors. The experimental database used for the evaluation of the models includes transitional boundary layers at different free-flow turbulence intensities with and without the pressure gradient, four airfoil flows with different LTT scenarios, and a tandem of two airfoils. It is found that at low levels of turbulence, the results of the SA BCM and SST kγ models may depend on the initial approximation, which does not allow them to be recommended for engineering applications. The best results, comparable in accuracy to those of differential models, are obtained using the SST alg-γ model.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
层流-湍流转换代数模型的比较分析
摘要 本文介绍了对最近提出的四个代数层流-湍流转换(LTT)模型的广泛测试结果。选择用于评估的模型,即 SST KD、SST kγ、SST alg-γ 和 SA BCM,是在内部代码 NTS 中实现的,并通过将获得的结果与模型作者发表的结果进行比较来验证。用于评估模型的实验数据库包括有压力梯度和无压力梯度的不同自由流湍流强度下的过渡边界层、不同 LTT 情景下的四个机翼流以及两个机翼的串联流。研究发现,在低湍流水平下,SA BCM 和 SST kγ 模型的结果可能取决于初始近似值,因此不能推荐用于工程应用。使用 SST alg-γ 模型得到的结果最好,精度与差分模型相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations
Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations Mathematics-Computational Mathematics
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations  is a journal that publishes high-quality and original articles at the forefront of development of mathematical models, numerical methods, computer-assisted studies in science and engineering with the potential for impact across the sciences, and construction of massively parallel codes for supercomputers. The problem-oriented papers are devoted to various problems including industrial mathematics, numerical simulation in multiscale and multiphysics, materials science, chemistry, economics, social, and life sciences.
期刊最新文献
Numerical Modeling of Compressible Mixing Layers with a Bicompact Scheme Numerical Simulation of a Gas Flow in a Stage-Diffuser System in a Wide Range of Modes with Experimental Verification A Model of the Russian Banking System with a Breakdown of the Main Asset and Liability Categories by Maturity Numerical Modeling of Noise Generation by Different Propeller Configurations of a Multicopter Numerical Modeling of a Groundwater Flow in Fractured Porous Media Based on the DFM Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1