Promoting student empowerment in student partnership-student representation integrations

IF 3.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1007/s10734-024-01252-8
Justin Patrick
{"title":"Promoting student empowerment in student partnership-student representation integrations","authors":"Justin Patrick","doi":"10.1007/s10734-024-01252-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the twenty-first century, the growing decline and collapse of democratic student governments in higher education around the world has been paralleled by the spread of the student partnerships approach to student leadership. While attempting to foster collaboration between students and other education relevant parties, if the student partnerships approach is not implemented in a way that is cognizant of the inherent power disparities between student and non-student relevant parties, it can run the risk of supplanting student democracy with undemocratic structures in which students have no structural power to effect educational change. This article responds to attempts to deterritorialize student partnerships and student voice approaches in Cornelius-Bell, Bell, and Dollinger’s (Higher Education, 2023) article in <i>Higher Education</i> by adding a student power lens to demonstrate how student leadership approaches that integrate student partnerships and student voice can be implemented in ways that contribute to student empowerment and mitigate the risk of students being manipulated to serve non-students’ micropolitical goals. Political philosophy scholarship is applied to such student leadership contexts to illustrate the power imbalances between students and non-students. Two examples of healthy integrations, a liberal democratic student government and an open participation student partnership, are theorized as ways forward that can equitably and effectively garner both structural student power and mutually beneficial collaborations between relevant parties.</p>","PeriodicalId":48383,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01252-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the twenty-first century, the growing decline and collapse of democratic student governments in higher education around the world has been paralleled by the spread of the student partnerships approach to student leadership. While attempting to foster collaboration between students and other education relevant parties, if the student partnerships approach is not implemented in a way that is cognizant of the inherent power disparities between student and non-student relevant parties, it can run the risk of supplanting student democracy with undemocratic structures in which students have no structural power to effect educational change. This article responds to attempts to deterritorialize student partnerships and student voice approaches in Cornelius-Bell, Bell, and Dollinger’s (Higher Education, 2023) article in Higher Education by adding a student power lens to demonstrate how student leadership approaches that integrate student partnerships and student voice can be implemented in ways that contribute to student empowerment and mitigate the risk of students being manipulated to serve non-students’ micropolitical goals. Political philosophy scholarship is applied to such student leadership contexts to illustrate the power imbalances between students and non-students. Two examples of healthy integrations, a liberal democratic student government and an open participation student partnership, are theorized as ways forward that can equitably and effectively garner both structural student power and mutually beneficial collaborations between relevant parties.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在学生伙伴关系--学生代表一体化中促进学生赋权
在二十一世纪,与世界各地高等教育中学生民主政府的日益衰落和崩溃相伴而生的,是学生领导力中学生伙伴关系方式的传播。虽然学生伙伴关系旨在促进学生与其他教育相关方之间的合作,但如果在实施过程中没有认识到学生与非学生相关方之间固有的权力差异,就有可能以不民主的结构取代学生民主,而学生在这种结构中没有实现教育变革的结构性权力。科尼利厄斯-贝尔、贝尔和多林格(Higher Education, 2023)在《高等教育》(Higher Education)杂志上发表文章,试图将学生伙伴关系和学生话语权非地域化,本文对此做出回应,增加了一个学生权力视角,展示如何以有助于学生赋权的方式实施整合学生伙伴关系和学生话语权的学生领导方法,并降低学生被操纵以服务于非学生微观政治目标的风险。政治哲学学术研究被应用于这种学生领导力的背景中,以说明学生与非学生之间的权力不平衡。自由民主的学生政府和开放参与的学生伙伴关系这两个健康整合的例子,被理论化为能够公平有效地获得结构性学生权力和相关各方之间互利合作的前进方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Higher Education
Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
12.00%
发文量
160
期刊介绍: Higher Education is recognised as the leading international journal of Higher Education studies, publishing twelve separate numbers each year. Since its establishment in 1972, Higher Education has followed educational developments throughout the world in universities, polytechnics, colleges, and vocational and education institutions. It has actively endeavoured to report on developments in both public and private Higher Education sectors. Contributions have come from leading scholars from different countries while articles have tackled the problems of teachers as well as students, and of planners as well as administrators. While each Higher Education system has its own distinctive features, common problems and issues are shared internationally by researchers, teachers and institutional leaders. Higher Education offers opportunities for exchange of research results, experience and insights, and provides a forum for ongoing discussion between experts. Higher Education publishes authoritative overview articles, comparative studies and analyses of particular problems or issues. All contributions are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
“Writing for English-medium publication is a journey to nowhere — no route and no tools”: Russian academics’ perceptions of the existing publication support The enigma of collegiality: collegiality frames and institutional logics in US higher education Navigating public goods: Chilean public universities and their transformative role in Latin America Exploring perceptions of public good(s), government, and global contributions in Japanese higher education: a phenomenographic approach The importance of international and national publications for promotion and the impact of recruitment policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1