Comparable biodiversity and demographic structure between sacred groves and protected forests with Dipterocarpus hasseltii reveal conservation value of customary forests in Bali, Indonesia

IF 3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biodiversity and Conservation Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1007/s10531-024-02885-y
Ni Kadek Erosi Undaharta, Francesco Martini, Alison Kim Shan Wee
{"title":"Comparable biodiversity and demographic structure between sacred groves and protected forests with Dipterocarpus hasseltii reveal conservation value of customary forests in Bali, Indonesia","authors":"Ni Kadek Erosi Undaharta, Francesco Martini, Alison Kim Shan Wee","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02885-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sacred groves are natural forests that are managed by local communities to support their cultural and religious practices. These forests are often refugia to threatened species and crucial nodes of biodiversity in an increasingly human-dominated landscape. In Asia, conservation evidence of sacred groves is often geographically limited to a few overrepresented countries. Here, we present the first empirical study on the tree communities in sacred groves in Bali, Indonesia, and compare them to formally gazetted protected forests without a sacred status. Specifically, we measured the diversity, basal area and density of tree species from three ontogenetic stages (adults, saplings, and seedlings) in sacred groves and protected forests that contain <i>Dipterocarpus hasseltii</i>, a globally Endangered dominant canopy tree species of local cultural significance. Our results showed that sacred groves and protected forests with <i>D. hasseltii</i> populations had similar levels of tree species richness, diversity, and density of saplings and seedlings. The density of <i>D. hasseltii</i> individuals and the basal area of all species of adult trees was higher in sacred groves than in protected forests, potentially due to culturally-driven active protection of <i>D. hasseltii</i> and large, old trees in the sacred groves. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that local community’s involvement in forest governance had a positive impact on biodiversity conservation that was comparable to protected forests. Despite sacred groves being invaluable localities for <i>in-situ</i> conservation of threatened tree species, incorporation into existing protected area network could diminish the autonomy and traditions of the local communities. Therefore, our study provides crucial evidence of the circumstances under which customary forests balanced both natural resource use and biodiversity conservation. This lends support to Indonesia’s forest decentralization policies through which local communities can maintain stewardship over biodiversity-rich customary forests.</p>","PeriodicalId":8843,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity and Conservation","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02885-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sacred groves are natural forests that are managed by local communities to support their cultural and religious practices. These forests are often refugia to threatened species and crucial nodes of biodiversity in an increasingly human-dominated landscape. In Asia, conservation evidence of sacred groves is often geographically limited to a few overrepresented countries. Here, we present the first empirical study on the tree communities in sacred groves in Bali, Indonesia, and compare them to formally gazetted protected forests without a sacred status. Specifically, we measured the diversity, basal area and density of tree species from three ontogenetic stages (adults, saplings, and seedlings) in sacred groves and protected forests that contain Dipterocarpus hasseltii, a globally Endangered dominant canopy tree species of local cultural significance. Our results showed that sacred groves and protected forests with D. hasseltii populations had similar levels of tree species richness, diversity, and density of saplings and seedlings. The density of D. hasseltii individuals and the basal area of all species of adult trees was higher in sacred groves than in protected forests, potentially due to culturally-driven active protection of D. hasseltii and large, old trees in the sacred groves. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that local community’s involvement in forest governance had a positive impact on biodiversity conservation that was comparable to protected forests. Despite sacred groves being invaluable localities for in-situ conservation of threatened tree species, incorporation into existing protected area network could diminish the autonomy and traditions of the local communities. Therefore, our study provides crucial evidence of the circumstances under which customary forests balanced both natural resource use and biodiversity conservation. This lends support to Indonesia’s forest decentralization policies through which local communities can maintain stewardship over biodiversity-rich customary forests.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圣林和保护林之间可比的生物多样性和人口结构揭示了印度尼西亚巴厘岛传统森林的保护价值
神林是当地社区为支持其文化和宗教活动而管理的天然林。这些森林通常是濒危物种的栖息地,也是在人类日益主导的景观中生物多样性的重要节点。在亚洲,圣林的保护证据往往局限于少数几个代表性较强的国家。在此,我们首次对印度尼西亚巴厘岛神圣丛林中的树木群落进行了实证研究,并将其与正式公布的无神圣地位的受保护森林进行了比较。具体来说,我们测量了圣林和保护林中三个发育阶段(成树、树苗和幼苗)树种的多样性、基部面积和密度,圣林和保护林中都有Dipterocarpus hasseltii,这是一种具有当地文化意义的全球濒危优势树冠树种。我们的研究结果表明,拥有 D. hasseltii 种群的圣林和保护林的树种丰富度、多样性以及树苗和幼苗密度水平相似。神圣丛林园中的 D. hasseltii 个体密度和所有成年树种的基部面积均高于保护林,这可能是由于在文化驱动下,人们积极保护神圣丛林园中的 D. hasseltii 和大型古树。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,当地社区参与森林治理对生物多样性保护的积极影响与受保护森林不相上下。尽管圣林是就地保护濒危树种的宝贵场所,但将其纳入现有的保护区网络可能会削弱当地社区的自主性和传统。因此,我们的研究为传统森林在自然资源利用和生物多样性保护之间取得平衡提供了重要证据。这为印度尼西亚的森林权力下放政策提供了支持,通过这些政策,当地社区可以维持对生物多样性丰富的传统森林的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biodiversity and Conservation
Biodiversity and Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Biodiversity and Conservation is an international journal that publishes articles on all aspects of biological diversity-its description, analysis and conservation, and its controlled rational use by humankind. The scope of Biodiversity and Conservation is wide and multidisciplinary, and embraces all life-forms. The journal presents research papers, as well as editorials, comments and research notes on biodiversity and conservation, and contributions dealing with the practicalities of conservation management, economic, social and political issues. The journal provides a forum for examining conflicts between sustainable development and human dependence on biodiversity in agriculture, environmental management and biotechnology, and encourages contributions from developing countries to promote broad global perspectives on matters of biodiversity and conservation.
期刊最新文献
An assessment of the implementation of the EU policy for conservation varieties from 2009 to 2023 and its relationship to Geographical Indications The iconic Jubaea chilensis teeters on the edge of local extinction: a plea for enhanced conservation policies High site fidelity and reduced survival of a mycophagous mammal after prescribed fire An assessment of liverwort richness, endemicity and conservation in a megadiverse country - Colombia Wilderness areas maintain mammal assemblage in subtropical mountain forests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1