Intraspecific variation in Arabidopsis thaliana autotoxicity

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Plant Ecology Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1007/s11258-024-01439-0
Mimi Byrne, Robert Warren
{"title":"Intraspecific variation in Arabidopsis thaliana autotoxicity","authors":"Mimi Byrne, Robert Warren","doi":"10.1007/s11258-024-01439-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Just as plants attack heterospecific competitors with allelopathic phytotoxins, they also attack conspecifics with phytotoxins to inhibit seedling germination and growth (autotoxicity). As a result, for many plant species, autotoxicity limits offspring germination and growth proximate to parental plants—consequently reducing deleterious density dependent effects. Autotoxicity appears to vary across species, but it also may vary within species. We tested autotoxicity and variability in six ecotypes of the model plant, <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i>, using allelopathy bioassays<i>.</i> We found that autotoxic impacts varied across the Eurasian and African ecotypes, and the negative effects on conspecific root growth were greater from above-than belowground exudate. In half the ecotypes, root growth decreased 71% in seedlings treated with exudate from the same ecotype than when treated with exudate from other ecotypes. That the ecotypes limited themselves more than they did other ecotypes is consistent with coexistence theory, which assumes species limit themselves more than others. Moreover, it is consistent with negative density dependent theories that suggest seedling mortality is highest near conspecific adults. Finally, the variation in autotoxicity across ecotypes suggests that intraspecific genetic variability and/or local habitat influence autotoxic intensity. It is well recognized that phytotoxic effect (allelopathy and autotoxicity) varies interspecifically but ecotype-level effects suggests that plants may exhibit greater intraspecific variation in autotoxicity than currently recognized.</p>","PeriodicalId":20233,"journal":{"name":"Plant Ecology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-024-01439-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Just as plants attack heterospecific competitors with allelopathic phytotoxins, they also attack conspecifics with phytotoxins to inhibit seedling germination and growth (autotoxicity). As a result, for many plant species, autotoxicity limits offspring germination and growth proximate to parental plants—consequently reducing deleterious density dependent effects. Autotoxicity appears to vary across species, but it also may vary within species. We tested autotoxicity and variability in six ecotypes of the model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana, using allelopathy bioassays. We found that autotoxic impacts varied across the Eurasian and African ecotypes, and the negative effects on conspecific root growth were greater from above-than belowground exudate. In half the ecotypes, root growth decreased 71% in seedlings treated with exudate from the same ecotype than when treated with exudate from other ecotypes. That the ecotypes limited themselves more than they did other ecotypes is consistent with coexistence theory, which assumes species limit themselves more than others. Moreover, it is consistent with negative density dependent theories that suggest seedling mortality is highest near conspecific adults. Finally, the variation in autotoxicity across ecotypes suggests that intraspecific genetic variability and/or local habitat influence autotoxic intensity. It is well recognized that phytotoxic effect (allelopathy and autotoxicity) varies interspecifically but ecotype-level effects suggests that plants may exhibit greater intraspecific variation in autotoxicity than currently recognized.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拟南芥自毒的种内变异
正如植物用等位植物毒素攻击异种竞争者一样,它们也用植物毒素攻击同种竞争者,以抑制幼苗的发芽和生长(自体毒性)。因此,对于许多植物物种来说,自体毒性会限制后代在亲本植物附近发芽和生长,从而减少密度依赖性的有害影响。自体毒性似乎因物种而异,但也可能因物种而异。我们利用等位基因生物测定法测试了模式植物拟南芥的六个生态型的自毒性和变异性。我们发现,欧亚和非洲生态型的自毒影响各不相同,地上部渗出物对同种植物根系生长的负面影响大于地下渗出物。在一半的生态型中,用同一生态型的渗出物处理的幼苗,其根系生长比用其他生态型的渗出物处理的幼苗减少 71%。生态型对自身的限制大于对其他生态型的限制,这与共存理论是一致的,该理论认为物种对自身的限制大于对其他物种的限制。此外,这也符合负密度依赖理论,该理论认为同种成虫附近的幼苗死亡率最高。最后,不同生态型之间的自毒差异表明,种内遗传变异和/或当地生境会影响自毒强度。众所周知,植物毒性效应(等位基因和自体毒性)在种间存在差异,但生态型效应表明,植物自体毒性的种内差异可能比目前认识到的更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Ecology
Plant Ecology 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8.6 months
期刊介绍: Plant Ecology publishes original scientific papers that report and interpret the findings of pure and applied research into the ecology of vascular plants in terrestrial and wetland ecosystems. Empirical, experimental, theoretical and review papers reporting on ecophysiology, population, community, ecosystem, landscape, molecular and historical ecology are within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Ski slopes as an unrecognized source of human impact on vegetation Effects of host size and substrate types on the distribution of accidental and obligate epiphytes: a case study in a temperate forest of Japan Effect of competition, with exotic invasive Bromus inermis and native Quercus stellata, and soil amendment on the performance of native invasive Juniperus virginiana Modelling landscape-scale occurrences of common grassland species in a topographically complex mountainous environment Prediction of historical, current and future potential distribution of Rhus chinensis (Anacardiaceae) based on the optimized MaxEnt model in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1