History of Science in Physics Education in the Last Decade: Which Direction We Are Heading?

IF 3.1 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Science & Education Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1007/s11191-024-00537-9
Matheus Henrique Thomas Becker, Leonardo Albuquerque Heidemann, Nathan Willig Lima
{"title":"History of Science in Physics Education in the Last Decade: Which Direction We Are Heading?","authors":"Matheus Henrique Thomas Becker, Leonardo Albuquerque Heidemann, Nathan Willig Lima","doi":"10.1007/s11191-024-00537-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The focus on history of science (HOS) in physics education has been advocated for a long time. However, what are the actual implications of proposals with this focus and the recent advancements in this research field? What are the possible connections between HOS and emergent topics, such as <i>decoloniality, social justice</i>, and <i>post-truth</i>? With those inquiries in mind, a systematic review of empirical research on the use of HOS in physics classes was conducted for the period from 2012 to 2022. The goal was to investigate recent researches objectives in this area, their recurring research methods, the conceptions of nature of science (NOS) employed, the underlying theoretical frameworks of instructional approaches, the main methodologies used in implementations, and the key findings of these studies. The same selection and exclusion criteria as Teixeira et al. (<i>Science &amp; Education</i> <i>21</i>:771–796, 2012) were applied, resulting in a raw sample of 1296 articles and a final sample of 32 articles for the review. A reinterpretation of the categorization by Seroglou and Koumaras (2001) was also conducted to assess the research objectives and outcomes. It is concluded that research on the use of HOS in physics classes remains primarily theoretical, with limited studies on concrete implementations. Qualitative methods dominate empirical research in this context. We did not find articles empirically evaluating the use of HOS in physics classes related to emergent topics in Science Education, although there are arguments in the literature supporting the use of HOS, specifically focusing on historical episodes about silenced or omitted individuals and cultures in history, as an alternative to problematize a ‘white Eurocentric science’. Regarding teaching and learning, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) there is consensus that HOS fosters students’ interest and the development of NOS-related knowledge; (2) there is a research gap regarding the connection between HOS and procedural knowledge; and (3) HOS promotes conceptual learning, although the specific elements that facilitate this learning are not investigated in the studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00537-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The focus on history of science (HOS) in physics education has been advocated for a long time. However, what are the actual implications of proposals with this focus and the recent advancements in this research field? What are the possible connections between HOS and emergent topics, such as decoloniality, social justice, and post-truth? With those inquiries in mind, a systematic review of empirical research on the use of HOS in physics classes was conducted for the period from 2012 to 2022. The goal was to investigate recent researches objectives in this area, their recurring research methods, the conceptions of nature of science (NOS) employed, the underlying theoretical frameworks of instructional approaches, the main methodologies used in implementations, and the key findings of these studies. The same selection and exclusion criteria as Teixeira et al. (Science & Education 21:771–796, 2012) were applied, resulting in a raw sample of 1296 articles and a final sample of 32 articles for the review. A reinterpretation of the categorization by Seroglou and Koumaras (2001) was also conducted to assess the research objectives and outcomes. It is concluded that research on the use of HOS in physics classes remains primarily theoretical, with limited studies on concrete implementations. Qualitative methods dominate empirical research in this context. We did not find articles empirically evaluating the use of HOS in physics classes related to emergent topics in Science Education, although there are arguments in the literature supporting the use of HOS, specifically focusing on historical episodes about silenced or omitted individuals and cultures in history, as an alternative to problematize a ‘white Eurocentric science’. Regarding teaching and learning, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) there is consensus that HOS fosters students’ interest and the development of NOS-related knowledge; (2) there is a research gap regarding the connection between HOS and procedural knowledge; and (3) HOS promotes conceptual learning, although the specific elements that facilitate this learning are not investigated in the studies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过去十年物理教育中的科学史:我们朝哪个方向前进?
在物理教育中关注科学史(HOS)已被提倡了很长时间。然而,以科学史为重点的建议和这一研究领域的最新进展有何实际意义?科学史与新出现的话题,如非殖民主义、社会正义和后真相之间可能存在哪些联系?带着这些疑问,我们对 2012 年至 2022 年期间有关在物理课上使用居家养老服务的实证研究进行了系统回顾。目的是调查该领域近期的研究目标、经常使用的研究方法、采用的科学本质(NOS)概念、教学方法的基本理论框架、实施过程中使用的主要方法以及这些研究的主要发现。我们采用了与 Teixeira 等人(《科学与amp;教育》21:771-796,2012 年)相同的选择和排除标准,得出了 1296 篇文章的原始样本和 32 篇文章的最终综述样本。还对 Seroglou 和 Koumaras(2001 年)的分类进行了重新解释,以评估研究目标和成果。得出的结论是,关于在物理课上使用居家办公系统的研究仍以理论研究为主,具体实施方面的研究有限。定性方法在这方面的实证研究中占主导地位。我们没有找到实证评估在物理课上使用与科学教育新出现的主题相关的 "居者有其屋 "的文章,尽管文献中有支持使用 "居者有其屋 "的论点,特别是关注历史上被沉默或遗漏的个人和文化的历史事件,以此作为解决 "以欧洲白人为中心的科学 "问题的替代方法。在教与学方面,可以得出以下结论:(1) 人们一致认为,居家养老服务可以培养学生的兴趣,发展与国民教育有关的知识;(2) 在居家养老服务与程序性知识之间的联系方面还存在研究空白;(3) 居家养老服务可以促进概念学习,尽管研究中没有对促进这种学习的具体因素进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]
期刊最新文献
Designing and leading justice‐centered informal STEM education: A framework for core equitable practices Reflection time and valuing science: Elementary teachers' science subject matter knowledge development during teaching experience Exploring how museums can support science teacher leaders as boundary spanners Viewing science teacher learning and curriculum enactment through the lens of theory of practice architectures Contextual resources supporting the co‐evolution of teachers' collective inquiry and classroom practice after the grant ended
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1