Common challenges of deep reinforcement learning applications development: an empirical study

IF 3.5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Empirical Software Engineering Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1007/s10664-024-10500-5
Mohammad Mehdi Morovati, Florian Tambon, Mina Taraghi, Amin Nikanjam, Foutse Khomh
{"title":"Common challenges of deep reinforcement learning applications development: an empirical study","authors":"Mohammad Mehdi Morovati, Florian Tambon, Mina Taraghi, Amin Nikanjam, Foutse Khomh","doi":"10.1007/s10664-024-10500-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Machine Learning (ML) is increasingly being adopted in different industries. Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) is a subdomain of ML used to produce intelligent agents. Despite recent developments in DRL technology, the main challenges that developers face in the development of DRL applications are still unknown. To fill this gap, in this paper, we conduct a large-scale empirical study of <b>927</b> DRL-related posts extracted from Stack Overflow, the most popular Q &amp;A platform in the software community. Through the process of labeling and categorizing extracted posts, we created a taxonomy of common challenges encountered in the development of DRL applications, along with their corresponding popularity levels. This taxonomy has been validated through a survey involving 65 DRL developers. Results show that at least <span>\\(45\\%\\)</span> of developers experienced 18 of the 21 challenges identified in the taxonomy. The most frequent source of difficulty during the development of DRL applications are <i>Comprehension</i>, <i>API usage</i>, and <i>Design problems</i>, while <i>Parallel processing</i>, and <i>DRL libraries/frameworks</i> are classified as the most difficult challenges to address, with respect to the time required to receive an accepted answer. We hope that the research community will leverage this taxonomy to develop efficient strategies to address the identified challenges and improve the quality of DRL applications</p>","PeriodicalId":11525,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Software Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10500-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine Learning (ML) is increasingly being adopted in different industries. Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) is a subdomain of ML used to produce intelligent agents. Despite recent developments in DRL technology, the main challenges that developers face in the development of DRL applications are still unknown. To fill this gap, in this paper, we conduct a large-scale empirical study of 927 DRL-related posts extracted from Stack Overflow, the most popular Q &A platform in the software community. Through the process of labeling and categorizing extracted posts, we created a taxonomy of common challenges encountered in the development of DRL applications, along with their corresponding popularity levels. This taxonomy has been validated through a survey involving 65 DRL developers. Results show that at least \(45\%\) of developers experienced 18 of the 21 challenges identified in the taxonomy. The most frequent source of difficulty during the development of DRL applications are Comprehension, API usage, and Design problems, while Parallel processing, and DRL libraries/frameworks are classified as the most difficult challenges to address, with respect to the time required to receive an accepted answer. We hope that the research community will leverage this taxonomy to develop efficient strategies to address the identified challenges and improve the quality of DRL applications

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深度强化学习应用开发的常见挑战:实证研究
机器学习(ML)正被越来越多地应用于各行各业。深度强化学习(DRL)是 ML 的一个子领域,用于生产智能代理。尽管 DRL 技术近年来取得了长足发展,但开发人员在开发 DRL 应用程序时所面临的主要挑战仍不为人知。为了填补这一空白,我们在本文中对从软件社区最受欢迎的问答平台 Stack Overflow 中提取的 927 篇与 DRL 相关的帖子进行了大规模实证研究。通过对提取的帖子进行标注和分类,我们创建了 DRL 应用程序开发过程中遇到的常见挑战分类法及其相应的流行程度。通过对 65 名 DRL 开发人员的调查,我们验证了这一分类法。结果表明,在分类法确定的 21 个挑战中,至少有 18 个开发者遇到过。在开发 DRL 应用程序的过程中,最常见的困难是理解问题、应用程序接口使用问题和设计问题,而并行处理和 DRL 库/框架被归类为最难解决的挑战,这与获得认可答案所需的时间有关。我们希望研究界能利用这一分类法来制定有效的策略,以应对已确定的挑战并提高 DRL 应用程序的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Empirical Software Engineering
Empirical Software Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
12.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Empirical Software Engineering provides a forum for applied software engineering research with a strong empirical component, and a venue for publishing empirical results relevant to both researchers and practitioners. Empirical studies presented here usually involve the collection and analysis of data and experience that can be used to characterize, evaluate and reveal relationships between software development deliverables, practices, and technologies. Over time, it is expected that such empirical results will form a body of knowledge leading to widely accepted and well-formed theories. The journal also offers industrial experience reports detailing the application of software technologies - processes, methods, or tools - and their effectiveness in industrial settings. Empirical Software Engineering promotes the publication of industry-relevant research, to address the significant gap between research and practice.
期刊最新文献
An empirical study on developers’ shared conversations with ChatGPT in GitHub pull requests and issues Quality issues in machine learning software systems An empirical study of token-based micro commits Software product line testing: a systematic literature review Consensus task interaction trace recommender to guide developers’ software navigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1