A literature review on CEE firms’ outward internationalization failures: definitions, processes, causes and consequences

Tiia Vissak
{"title":"A literature review on CEE firms’ outward internationalization failures: definitions, processes, causes and consequences","authors":"Tiia Vissak","doi":"10.1108/ribs-12-2023-0145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to summarize the literature (journal articles and book chapters) on Central and Eastern European (CEE) firms’ outward internationalization failures: definitions and understandings of “failure”, “failed” firms’ internationalization processes, causes of “failed” initial and subsequent foreign activities and consequences of “failed” internationalization.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This systematic-narrative hybrid literature review article focuses on CEE firms’ outward internationalization failures.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The paper demonstrates that different objective and subjective measures were used for defining and measuring “failure”. Consensus regarding which firms (from slow internationalizers to born globals) can be considered “failed” is lacking. In different studies, internal and external causes of CEE firms’ outward internationalization “failure” and internationalization-related and other consequences of “failed” internationalization also vary considerably. Due to the complexity of the “failure” phenomenon, it is impossible to identify the most characteristic type of “failed” internationalization or offer “optimal” advice for avoiding failures.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The author is not aware of any other literature review articles focused on CEE firms’ outward internationalization failures. This article contributes to the (international) business and (international) entrepreneurship literature focused on failures, exits and institutional and other factors affecting them.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45046,"journal":{"name":"Review of International Business and Strategy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of International Business and Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ribs-12-2023-0145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to summarize the literature (journal articles and book chapters) on Central and Eastern European (CEE) firms’ outward internationalization failures: definitions and understandings of “failure”, “failed” firms’ internationalization processes, causes of “failed” initial and subsequent foreign activities and consequences of “failed” internationalization.

Design/methodology/approach

This systematic-narrative hybrid literature review article focuses on CEE firms’ outward internationalization failures.

Findings

The paper demonstrates that different objective and subjective measures were used for defining and measuring “failure”. Consensus regarding which firms (from slow internationalizers to born globals) can be considered “failed” is lacking. In different studies, internal and external causes of CEE firms’ outward internationalization “failure” and internationalization-related and other consequences of “failed” internationalization also vary considerably. Due to the complexity of the “failure” phenomenon, it is impossible to identify the most characteristic type of “failed” internationalization or offer “optimal” advice for avoiding failures.

Originality/value

The author is not aware of any other literature review articles focused on CEE firms’ outward internationalization failures. This article contributes to the (international) business and (international) entrepreneurship literature focused on failures, exits and institutional and other factors affecting them.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中欧和东欧企业对外国际化失败的文献综述:定义、过程、原因和后果
本文旨在总结有关中东欧企业外向国际化失败的文献(期刊论文和书籍章节):"失败 "的定义和理解、"失败 "企业的国际化进程、"失败 "的初始和后续国外活动的原因以及 "失败 "的国际化的后果。对于哪些企业(从国际化进程缓慢的企业到天生的全球企业)可被视为 "失败",还缺乏共识。在不同的研究中,中东欧企业对外国际化 "失败 "的内部和外部原因以及国际化 "失败 "的相关后果和其他后果也有很大不同。由于 "失败 "现象的复杂性,我们无法确定 "失败 "国际化的最典型类型,也无法提供避免失败的 "最佳 "建议。本文对(国际)商业和(国际)创业文献有所贡献,这些文献主要关注失败、退出以及影响失败的制度和其他因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
25.80%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Review of International Business and Strategy is keen to present contemporary and innovative research that proposes new perspectives or challenges existing theories, and that advances the understanding of issues related to international business and global strategy. Themes covered by the journal include (but are not limited to): Internationalization of firms and international entrepreneurship Effects of international environment (political, social, economic and institutional) on international business activities and firm strategies Knowledge transfer strategies and innovation in MNEs Location strategies in international business activities.
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 impact on cross-border M&A advisory business in Japan Trade policy revisited: how government support initiatives affect international performance in SMEs? Decomposing socioemotional wealth: the effect of restricted and extended socioemotional priorities on family firms’ internationalization Is variety the spice of (expatriate) life? How cultural diversity in an expatriate’s home country affects their adjustment Family SMEs post-entry in international markets: decision modes on foreign partners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1