Performance Analysis of Random Forest Algorithm in Automatic Building Segmentation with Limited Data

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.3390/ijgi13070235
Ratri Widyastuti, Deni Suwardhi, Irwan Meilano, Andri Hernandi, Nabila S. E. Putri, Asep Yusup Saptari, Sudarman
{"title":"Performance Analysis of Random Forest Algorithm in Automatic Building Segmentation with Limited Data","authors":"Ratri Widyastuti, Deni Suwardhi, Irwan Meilano, Andri Hernandi, Nabila S. E. Putri, Asep Yusup Saptari, Sudarman","doi":"10.3390/ijgi13070235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Airborne laser technology produces point clouds that can be used to build 3D models of buildings. However, the work is a laborious process that could benefit from automation. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been widely used in automating building segmentation as one of the initial stages in the 3D modeling process. The algorithms with a high success rate using point clouds for automatic semantic segmentation are random forest (RF) and PointNet++, with each algorithm having its own advantages and disadvantages. However, the training and testing data to develop and test the model usually share similar characteristics. Moreover, producing a good automation model requires a lot of training data, which may become an issue for users with a small amount of training data (limited data). The aim of this research is to test the performance of the RF and PointNet++ models in different regions with limited training and testing data. We found that the RF model developed from a small amount data, in different regions between the training and testing data, performs well compared to PointNet++, yielding an OA score of 73.01% for the RF model. Furthermore, several scenarios have been used in this research to explore the capabilities of RF in several cases.","PeriodicalId":48738,"journal":{"name":"ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13070235","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Airborne laser technology produces point clouds that can be used to build 3D models of buildings. However, the work is a laborious process that could benefit from automation. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been widely used in automating building segmentation as one of the initial stages in the 3D modeling process. The algorithms with a high success rate using point clouds for automatic semantic segmentation are random forest (RF) and PointNet++, with each algorithm having its own advantages and disadvantages. However, the training and testing data to develop and test the model usually share similar characteristics. Moreover, producing a good automation model requires a lot of training data, which may become an issue for users with a small amount of training data (limited data). The aim of this research is to test the performance of the RF and PointNet++ models in different regions with limited training and testing data. We found that the RF model developed from a small amount data, in different regions between the training and testing data, performs well compared to PointNet++, yielding an OA score of 73.01% for the RF model. Furthermore, several scenarios have been used in this research to explore the capabilities of RF in several cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机森林算法在有限数据下的建筑物自动分段中的性能分析
机载激光技术产生的点云可用于建立建筑物的三维模型。然而,这项工作是一个费力的过程,可以从自动化中获益。人工智能(AI)作为三维建模过程的初始阶段之一,已被广泛应用于建筑物的自动分割。使用点云进行自动语义分割的成功率较高的算法有随机森林(RF)和 PointNet++,每种算法都有自己的优缺点。不过,用于开发和测试模型的训练数据和测试数据通常具有相似的特征。此外,建立一个良好的自动化模型需要大量的训练数据,这对于训练数据量较少(数据有限)的用户来说可能会成为一个问题。本研究的目的是利用有限的训练和测试数据,在不同地区测试 RF 和 PointNet++ 模型的性能。我们发现,在训练数据和测试数据之间的不同区域,根据少量数据开发的 RF 模型与 PointNet++ 相比表现良好,RF 模型的 OA 得分为 73.01%。此外,本研究还使用了几种场景来探索 RF 在几种情况下的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICALREMOTE SENSING&nb-REMOTE SENSING
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
520
审稿时长
19.87 days
期刊介绍: ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information (ISSN 2220-9964) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of geographic information. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information publishes regular research papers, reviews and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. The 2018 IJGI Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJGI. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijgi/awards.
期刊最新文献
Geometric Characterization of the Mateur Plain in Northern Tunisia Using Vertical Electrical Sounding and Remote Sensing Techniques Potentials in Using VR for Facilitating Geography Teaching in Classrooms: A Systematic Review Urban Internal Network Structure and Resilience Characteristics from the Perspective of Population Mobility: A Case Study of Nanjing, China Investigating Spatial Effects through Machine Learning and Leveraging Explainable AI for Child Malnutrition in Pakistan Mapping Localization Preferences for Residential Buildings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1