A comparative study of software defect binomial classification prediction models based on machine learning

IF 1.7 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Software Quality Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1007/s11219-024-09683-3
Hongwei Tao, Xiaoxu Niu, Lang Xu, Lianyou Fu, Qiaoling Cao, Haoran Chen, Songtao Shang, Yang Xian
{"title":"A comparative study of software defect binomial classification prediction models based on machine learning","authors":"Hongwei Tao, Xiaoxu Niu, Lang Xu, Lianyou Fu, Qiaoling Cao, Haoran Chen, Songtao Shang, Yang Xian","doi":"10.1007/s11219-024-09683-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As information technology continues to advance, software applications are becoming increasingly critical. However, the growing size and complexity of software development can lead to serious flaws resulting in significant financial losses. To address this issue, Software Defect Prediction (SDP) technology is being developed to detect and resolve defects early in the software development process, ensuring high software quality. As a result, SDP research has become a major focus for academics worldwide. This study aims to compare various machine learning-based SDP algorithm models and determine if traditional machine learning algorithms affect SDP outcomes. Unlike previous studies that aimed to identify the best prediction model for all datasets, this paper constructs SDP superiority models separately for different datasets. Using the publicly available ESEM2016 dataset, 13 machine learning classification algorithms are employed to predict software defects. Evaluation indicators such as Accuracy, AUC(Area Under the Curve), F-measure, and Running Time(RT) are utilized to assess the performance of the classification algorithms. Due to the serious class imbalance problem in this dataset, 10 sampling methods are combined with the 13 machine learning algorithms to explore the effect of sampling techniques on the performance of traditional machine learning classification models. Finally, a comprehensive evaluation is conducted to identify the best combination of sampling techniques and classification models to construct the final dominant model for SDP.</p>","PeriodicalId":21827,"journal":{"name":"Software Quality Journal","volume":"189 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Software Quality Journal","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-024-09683-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As information technology continues to advance, software applications are becoming increasingly critical. However, the growing size and complexity of software development can lead to serious flaws resulting in significant financial losses. To address this issue, Software Defect Prediction (SDP) technology is being developed to detect and resolve defects early in the software development process, ensuring high software quality. As a result, SDP research has become a major focus for academics worldwide. This study aims to compare various machine learning-based SDP algorithm models and determine if traditional machine learning algorithms affect SDP outcomes. Unlike previous studies that aimed to identify the best prediction model for all datasets, this paper constructs SDP superiority models separately for different datasets. Using the publicly available ESEM2016 dataset, 13 machine learning classification algorithms are employed to predict software defects. Evaluation indicators such as Accuracy, AUC(Area Under the Curve), F-measure, and Running Time(RT) are utilized to assess the performance of the classification algorithms. Due to the serious class imbalance problem in this dataset, 10 sampling methods are combined with the 13 machine learning algorithms to explore the effect of sampling techniques on the performance of traditional machine learning classification models. Finally, a comprehensive evaluation is conducted to identify the best combination of sampling techniques and classification models to construct the final dominant model for SDP.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的软件缺陷二项式分类预测模型比较研究
随着信息技术的不断进步,软件应用变得越来越重要。然而,软件开发的规模和复杂性不断增加,可能导致严重缺陷,造成重大经济损失。为了解决这个问题,人们正在开发软件缺陷预测(SDP)技术,以便在软件开发过程中及早发现和解决缺陷,确保软件的高质量。因此,SDP 研究已成为全球学术界关注的焦点。本研究旨在比较各种基于机器学习的 SDP 算法模型,并确定传统机器学习算法是否会影响 SDP 的结果。与以往旨在确定所有数据集最佳预测模型的研究不同,本文针对不同数据集分别构建了 SDP 优越性模型。利用公开的 ESEM2016 数据集,采用 13 种机器学习分类算法来预测软件缺陷。利用准确率、AUC(曲线下面积)、F-measure 和运行时间(RT)等评价指标来评估分类算法的性能。由于该数据集存在严重的类不平衡问题,因此将 10 种抽样方法与 13 种机器学习算法相结合,以探讨抽样技术对传统机器学习分类模型性能的影响。最后,进行综合评估,找出抽样技术与分类模型的最佳组合,构建出 SDP 的最终主导模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Software Quality Journal
Software Quality Journal 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aims of the Software Quality Journal are: (1) To promote awareness of the crucial role of quality management in the effective construction of the software systems developed, used, and/or maintained by organizations in pursuit of their business objectives. (2) To provide a forum of the exchange of experiences and information on software quality management and the methods, tools and products used to measure and achieve it. (3) To provide a vehicle for the publication of academic papers related to all aspects of software quality. The Journal addresses all aspects of software quality from both a practical and an academic viewpoint. It invites contributions from practitioners and academics, as well as national and international policy and standard making bodies, and sets out to be the definitive international reference source for such information. The Journal will accept research, technique, case study, survey and tutorial submissions that address quality-related issues including, but not limited to: internal and external quality standards, management of quality within organizations, technical aspects of quality, quality aspects for product vendors, software measurement and metrics, software testing and other quality assurance techniques, total quality management and cultural aspects. Other technical issues with regard to software quality, including: data management, formal methods, safety critical applications, and CASE.
期刊最新文献
Towards effective gamification of existing systems: method and experience report KeyTitle: towards better bug report title generation by keywords planning Getting into the game: gamifying software development with the GSA framework Navigating social debt and its link with technical debt in large-scale agile software development projects Programming languages ranking based on energy measurements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1