Adhesion Systems in New Supports for Mural Paintings: Reversibility Tests

IF 0.8 4区化学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Studies in Conservation Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1080/00393630.2024.2356426

S. Cristina Marín-Marín, Teresa López-Martínez, Victor J. Medina-Flórez

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a study that investigates the utilization of diverse adhesives and intervention layers for affixing new supports to archaeological mural paintings that cannot be preserved in ...

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

壁画新支架中的粘合系统：可逆性测试

本文介绍了一项研究，该研究探讨了如何利用不同的粘合剂和干预层，为无法保存的考古壁画粘贴新的支撑物。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Studies in Conservation 化学-分析化学

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

12.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Studies in Conservation is the premier international peer-reviewed journal for the conservation of historic and artistic works. The intended readership includes the conservation professional in the broadest sense of the term: practising conservators of all types of object, conservation, heritage and museum scientists, collection or conservation managers, teachers and students of conservation, and academic researchers in the subject areas of arts, archaeology, the built heritage, materials history, art technological research and material culture. Studies in Conservation publishes original work on a range of subjects including, but not limited to, examination methods for works of art, new research in the analysis of artistic materials, mechanisms of deterioration, advances in conservation practice, novel methods of treatment, conservation issues in display and storage, preventive conservation, issues of collection care, conservation history and ethics, and the history of materials and technological processes. Scientific content is not necessary, and the editors encourage the submission of practical articles, review papers, position papers on best practice and the philosophy and ethics of collecting and preservation, to help maintain the traditional balance of the journal. Whatever the subject matter, accounts of routine procedures are not accepted, except where these lead to results that are sufficiently novel and/or significant to be of general interest.