A Pilot Study of BRAIN BOOTCAMP, a Low-Intensity Intervention on Diet, Exercise, Cognitive Activity, and Social Interaction to Improve Older Adults’ Dementia Risk Scores

Joyce Siette, L. Dodds, K. Deckers, S. Köhler, I. Heger, P. Strutt, C. Johnco, V. Wuthrich, C. J. Armitage
{"title":"A Pilot Study of BRAIN BOOTCAMP, a Low-Intensity Intervention on Diet, Exercise, Cognitive Activity, and Social Interaction to Improve Older Adults’ Dementia Risk Scores","authors":"Joyce Siette, L. Dodds, K. Deckers, S. Köhler, I. Heger, P. Strutt, C. Johnco, V. Wuthrich, C. J. Armitage","doi":"10.14283/jpad.2024.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Little is known about the impact of short, low-intensity multidomain dementia risk reduction interventions in older adults.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>To examine the effectiveness and feasibility of a low-intensity multidomain lifestyle intervention on dementia risk and dementia literacy in Australian older adults.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Design</h3><p>Single-group pre-post design.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Setting</h3><p>Community-dwelling.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Participants</h3><p>A total of 853 older Australians (Mean age=73.3 years, SD=6.1) recruited from the community.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Intervention</h3><p>A 3-month dementia risk reduction program, BRAIN BOOTCAMP, including education, personalised risk information, physical cues for healthier choices and goal setting and planning to target four modifiable risk factors of diet, exercise, cognitive activity and social interaction in older adults.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Measurements</h3><p>The ‘LIfestyle for BRAin health’ (LIBRA) index was used to assess participants’ modifiable dementia risk based on 12 factors, with higher scores indicating greater risk. Dementia literacy was measured using a modified questionnaire derived from Dutch and British surveys, encompassing knowledge, risk reduction, and awareness aspects. Paired t-tests were used to compare dementia risk scores and dementia literacy before and after the program. Multivariate regressions were performed to identify sociodemographic and psychological factors associated with change in the LIBRA index.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Program attrition was high (58.3%). Participants who completed the program had decreased dementia risk scores (Cohen’s d=0.59, p&lt;0.001), increased dementia literacy and awareness (Cohen’s d=0.64, p&lt;0.001) and increased motivation to change lifestyle behaviors (Cohen’s d=0.25–0.52, p&lt;0.016). Participants with higher motivational beliefs had greater dementia risk reduction.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Improving older adults’ motivation and knowledge may help modify lifestyle behaviors to reduce dementia risk. However, program attrition remains a challenge, suggesting the need for strategies to enhance participant engagement and retention in such interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2024.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the impact of short, low-intensity multidomain dementia risk reduction interventions in older adults.

Objectives

To examine the effectiveness and feasibility of a low-intensity multidomain lifestyle intervention on dementia risk and dementia literacy in Australian older adults.

Design

Single-group pre-post design.

Setting

Community-dwelling.

Participants

A total of 853 older Australians (Mean age=73.3 years, SD=6.1) recruited from the community.

Intervention

A 3-month dementia risk reduction program, BRAIN BOOTCAMP, including education, personalised risk information, physical cues for healthier choices and goal setting and planning to target four modifiable risk factors of diet, exercise, cognitive activity and social interaction in older adults.

Measurements

The ‘LIfestyle for BRAin health’ (LIBRA) index was used to assess participants’ modifiable dementia risk based on 12 factors, with higher scores indicating greater risk. Dementia literacy was measured using a modified questionnaire derived from Dutch and British surveys, encompassing knowledge, risk reduction, and awareness aspects. Paired t-tests were used to compare dementia risk scores and dementia literacy before and after the program. Multivariate regressions were performed to identify sociodemographic and psychological factors associated with change in the LIBRA index.

Results

Program attrition was high (58.3%). Participants who completed the program had decreased dementia risk scores (Cohen’s d=0.59, p<0.001), increased dementia literacy and awareness (Cohen’s d=0.64, p<0.001) and increased motivation to change lifestyle behaviors (Cohen’s d=0.25–0.52, p<0.016). Participants with higher motivational beliefs had greater dementia risk reduction.

Conclusions

Improving older adults’ motivation and knowledge may help modify lifestyle behaviors to reduce dementia risk. However, program attrition remains a challenge, suggesting the need for strategies to enhance participant engagement and retention in such interventions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BRAIN BOOTCAMP 是一项关于饮食、运动、认知活动和社交互动的低强度干预措施,旨在提高老年人痴呆症风险评分的试点研究
背景关于短期、低强度、多领域痴呆风险降低干预措施对老年人的影响鲜为人知。目标研究低强度、多领域生活方式干预措施对澳大利亚老年人痴呆风险和痴呆知识的有效性和可行性。干预措施为期3个月的降低痴呆风险计划 "大脑训练营"(BRAIN BOOTCAMP),包括教育、个性化风险信息、更健康选择的身体提示以及目标设定和规划,针对老年人饮食、运动、认知活动和社交互动这四个可改变的风险因素。痴呆症认知度是通过一份源自荷兰和英国调查的改良问卷进行测量的,包括知识、降低风险和意识等方面。我们使用配对 t 检验来比较计划实施前后的痴呆症风险得分和痴呆症知识水平。研究还进行了多变量回归,以确定与 LIBRA 指数变化相关的社会人口和心理因素。完成计划的参与者痴呆症风险评分降低(Cohen's d=0.59,p<0.001),痴呆症知识和意识提高(Cohen's d=0.64,p<0.001),改变生活方式行为的动机增强(Cohen's d=0.25-0.52,p<0.016)。结论提高老年人的积极性和知识水平可能有助于改变生活方式以降低痴呆风险。结论提高老年人的积极性和知识水平可能有助于改变他们的生活方式,降低痴呆症的风险。然而,项目中的自然减员仍然是一个挑战,这表明需要制定策略来提高参与者的参与度和对此类干预的保留率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
期刊最新文献
Association between Cognitive Reserve Indicator and Chronic Disease-Free Survival: A Large Community-Based Longitudinal Study Phase 1 Studies of the Anti-Tau Monoclonal Antibody JNJ-63733657 in Healthy Participants and Participants with Alzheimer’s Disease Roles of TREM2 in the Pathological Mechanism and the Therapeutic Strategies of Alzheimer’s Disease Development and Validation the Mobile Toolbox (MTB) Spelling Test Correlates of Subjective Cognitive Decline in Black American Men
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1