Lucile Faurel, Mark Soliman, Jessica Watkins, Teri Lombardi Yohn
{"title":"Firm-level investor favoritism and the external financing and capital expenditure anomalies","authors":"Lucile Faurel, Mark Soliman, Jessica Watkins, Teri Lombardi Yohn","doi":"10.1007/s11156-024-01299-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prior literature documents a positive (negative) relation between past (future) stock returns and both external financing and capital expenditures. In this study, we examine whether managers’ financing and capital expenditure decisions are associated with firm-level investor favoritism (neglect) and, therefore, whether managers exploit investor mispricing by issuing more (less) capital and investing more (less) in capital expenditures when firm-level investor sentiment is high (low), which leads to more negative future stock returns. We employ both a stock’s extreme return momentum and extreme trading volume to capture firm-level investor favoritism (neglect), which reflects firm-level investor overpricing (underpricing) due to investor sentiment. We find that both external financing and capital expenditure decisions are positively (negatively) associated with favoritism (neglect) and that the previously documented negative association between future stock returns and external financing is more pronounced in periods of favoritism. However, we find no association between future stock returns and capital expenditures after controlling for external financing. These findings suggest that managers’ financing and capital expenditure decisions are associated with firm-level investor favoritism/neglect, and that managers exploit investor mispricing in making financing decisions, resulting in lower future stock returns.</p>","PeriodicalId":47688,"journal":{"name":"Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-024-01299-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prior literature documents a positive (negative) relation between past (future) stock returns and both external financing and capital expenditures. In this study, we examine whether managers’ financing and capital expenditure decisions are associated with firm-level investor favoritism (neglect) and, therefore, whether managers exploit investor mispricing by issuing more (less) capital and investing more (less) in capital expenditures when firm-level investor sentiment is high (low), which leads to more negative future stock returns. We employ both a stock’s extreme return momentum and extreme trading volume to capture firm-level investor favoritism (neglect), which reflects firm-level investor overpricing (underpricing) due to investor sentiment. We find that both external financing and capital expenditure decisions are positively (negatively) associated with favoritism (neglect) and that the previously documented negative association between future stock returns and external financing is more pronounced in periods of favoritism. However, we find no association between future stock returns and capital expenditures after controlling for external financing. These findings suggest that managers’ financing and capital expenditure decisions are associated with firm-level investor favoritism/neglect, and that managers exploit investor mispricing in making financing decisions, resulting in lower future stock returns.
期刊介绍:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting deals with research involving the interaction of finance with accounting, economics, and quantitative methods, focused on finance and accounting. The papers published present useful theoretical and methodological results with the support of interesting empirical applications. Purely theoretical and methodological research with the potential for important applications is also published. Besides the traditional high-quality theoretical and empirical research in finance, the journal also publishes papers dealing with interdisciplinary topics.