CFD simulation of a Rushton turbine stirred-tank using open-source software with critical evaluation of MRF-based rotation modeling

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS Meccanica Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1007/s11012-024-01824-z
Alfred Reid, Riccardo Rossi, Ciro Cottini, Andrea Benassi
{"title":"CFD simulation of a Rushton turbine stirred-tank using open-source software with critical evaluation of MRF-based rotation modeling","authors":"Alfred Reid, Riccardo Rossi, Ciro Cottini, Andrea Benassi","doi":"10.1007/s11012-024-01824-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A critical evaluation of the impact of the Multiple Reference Frame (MRF) technique on steady RANS simulations of a Rushton turbine stirred-tank is presented. The analysis, based on the open-source software OpenFOAM, is focused on the choice of the diameter and thickness of the MRF region and on their effect on the predicted velocity field and mixing times in the tank. Five diameters of the MRF region are compared for the same operating conditions of the turbine, showing limited differences in velocity profiles, which are found in general good agreement with available experimental data. Significant differences are nonetheless found in the predicted levels of turbulence intensity within the tank, with a considerable amount of artificially generated turbulence at the boundary of the MRF region for the largest diameters. The impact of the different predictions of the turbulent field on the modeling of the mixing process in the tank is evaluated by simulating the release of a passive scalar, using the frozen-flow field hypothesis. The results show changes in mixing times up to a factor of three when comparing MRF regions of different sizes. Thus, the present investigation highlights the importance of assessing the effect of the MRF zone size on numerical results as a standard practice in RANS based simulations of stirred-tanks.</p>","PeriodicalId":695,"journal":{"name":"Meccanica","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meccanica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-024-01824-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A critical evaluation of the impact of the Multiple Reference Frame (MRF) technique on steady RANS simulations of a Rushton turbine stirred-tank is presented. The analysis, based on the open-source software OpenFOAM, is focused on the choice of the diameter and thickness of the MRF region and on their effect on the predicted velocity field and mixing times in the tank. Five diameters of the MRF region are compared for the same operating conditions of the turbine, showing limited differences in velocity profiles, which are found in general good agreement with available experimental data. Significant differences are nonetheless found in the predicted levels of turbulence intensity within the tank, with a considerable amount of artificially generated turbulence at the boundary of the MRF region for the largest diameters. The impact of the different predictions of the turbulent field on the modeling of the mixing process in the tank is evaluated by simulating the release of a passive scalar, using the frozen-flow field hypothesis. The results show changes in mixing times up to a factor of three when comparing MRF regions of different sizes. Thus, the present investigation highlights the importance of assessing the effect of the MRF zone size on numerical results as a standard practice in RANS based simulations of stirred-tanks.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用开源软件对 Rushton 涡轮搅拌罐进行 CFD 模拟,并对基于 MRF 的旋转建模进行重要评估
本文对多参考框架(MRF)技术对 Rushton 涡轮搅拌槽稳定 RANS 模拟的影响进行了批判性评估。分析以开源软件 OpenFOAM 为基础,重点关注 MRF 区域直径和厚度的选择及其对预测速度场和搅拌罐内混合时间的影响。在涡轮机工作条件相同的情况下,对 MRF 区域的五种直径进行了比较,结果显示速度曲线的差异有限,与现有实验数据基本吻合。然而,水箱内湍流强度的预测水平存在显著差异,最大直径的 MRF 区域边界处存在大量人工产生的湍流。利用冻结流场假设,通过模拟被动标量的释放,评估了湍流场的不同预测对水槽内混合过程建模的影响。结果表明,在比较不同大小的 MRF 区域时,混合时间的变化可达三倍。因此,本研究强调了在基于 RANS 的搅拌罐模拟中,评估 MRF 区域大小对数值结果影响的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Meccanica
Meccanica 物理-力学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7 months
期刊介绍: Meccanica focuses on the methodological framework shared by mechanical scientists when addressing theoretical or applied problems. Original papers address various aspects of mechanical and mathematical modeling, of solution, as well as of analysis of system behavior. The journal explores fundamental and applications issues in established areas of mechanics research as well as in emerging fields; contemporary research on general mechanics, solid and structural mechanics, fluid mechanics, and mechanics of machines; interdisciplinary fields between mechanics and other mathematical and engineering sciences; interaction of mechanics with dynamical systems, advanced materials, control and computation; electromechanics; biomechanics. Articles include full length papers; topical overviews; brief notes; discussions and comments on published papers; book reviews; and an international calendar of conferences. Meccanica, the official journal of the Italian Association of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, was established in 1966.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of droplet collision characteristics with moving film and its comparison with stationary film: unsteady and 3D CLSVOF method Compound control method for reliability of the robotic arms with clearance joint Multiscale topology optimization of anisotropic multilayer periodic structures based on the isogeometric analysis method CFD and ray tracing analysis of a discrete nozzle for laser metal deposition Design and performance investigation of a sliding-mode adaptive proportional–integral–derivative control for cable-breakage scenario
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1