Promoting equity in the Conservation Reserve Program across the southeastern US

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1002/fee.2775
Sarah Hitchner, Parag Kadam, Alejandro Bolques, Alex Harvey, Alton Perry, Sherwynn Best, Danielle Atkins, Felicia Burke, Lincoln Larson, Kayla Stukes, Sam Cook, Ben Graham, Troy Bowman, Wayde Morse, Puneet Dwivedi
{"title":"Promoting equity in the Conservation Reserve Program across the southeastern US","authors":"Sarah Hitchner,&nbsp;Parag Kadam,&nbsp;Alejandro Bolques,&nbsp;Alex Harvey,&nbsp;Alton Perry,&nbsp;Sherwynn Best,&nbsp;Danielle Atkins,&nbsp;Felicia Burke,&nbsp;Lincoln Larson,&nbsp;Kayla Stukes,&nbsp;Sam Cook,&nbsp;Ben Graham,&nbsp;Troy Bowman,&nbsp;Wayde Morse,&nbsp;Puneet Dwivedi","doi":"10.1002/fee.2775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Black and female landowners, two of the largest groups of underserved landowners in the southeastern US, have considerably less land enrolled in the US Department of Agriculture's Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) than White and male landowners. The reasons for this discrepancy are complex and interrelated. Previous studies approached different facets of this problem using a variety of methods and analyses. Here, we conducted a synthetic literature review that demonstrates how the intertwined ecological, economic, and cultural concerns of underserved landowners influence their decisions about potential land conversion in the context of CRP requirements. Other studies have rarely considered such relevant factors as the sociocultural importance of land to underserved populations or the links between the limited participation of these groups in the CRP and historical racism and sexism in land management industries and agencies. Explicitly addressing these issues will help promote conservation equity in the CRP and other conservation programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"22 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2775","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2775","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Black and female landowners, two of the largest groups of underserved landowners in the southeastern US, have considerably less land enrolled in the US Department of Agriculture's Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) than White and male landowners. The reasons for this discrepancy are complex and interrelated. Previous studies approached different facets of this problem using a variety of methods and analyses. Here, we conducted a synthetic literature review that demonstrates how the intertwined ecological, economic, and cultural concerns of underserved landowners influence their decisions about potential land conversion in the context of CRP requirements. Other studies have rarely considered such relevant factors as the sociocultural importance of land to underserved populations or the links between the limited participation of these groups in the CRP and historical racism and sexism in land management industries and agencies. Explicitly addressing these issues will help promote conservation equity in the CRP and other conservation programs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进美国东南部地区保护储备计划的公平性
黑人和女性土地所有者是美国东南部两个最大的未得到充分服务的土地所有者群体,与白人和男性土地所有者相比,黑人和女性土地所有者加入美国农业部保护储备计划 (CRP) 的土地要少得多。造成这种差异的原因复杂且相互关联。以往的研究采用了各种方法和分析方法,从不同方面探讨了这一问题。在此,我们进行了一次综合文献综述,展示了未得到充分服务的土地所有者对生态、经济和文化的关注是如何在 CRP 要求的背景下影响他们对潜在土地转换的决策的。其他研究很少考虑土地对服务不足人群的社会文化重要性等相关因素,也很少考虑这些群体在 CRP 中的有限参与与土地管理行业和机构中历史上的种族主义和性别歧视之间的联系。明确解决这些问题将有助于促进 CRP 和其他保护计划中的保护公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
1.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is a publication by the Ecological Society of America that focuses on the significance of ecology and environmental science in various aspects of research and problem-solving. The journal covers topics such as biodiversity conservation, ecosystem preservation, natural resource management, public policy, and other related areas. The publication features a range of content, including peer-reviewed articles, editorials, commentaries, letters, and occasional special issues and topical series. It releases ten issues per year, excluding January and July. ESA members receive both print and electronic copies of the journal, while institutional subscriptions are also available. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is highly regarded in the field, as indicated by its ranking in the 2021 Journal Citation Reports by Clarivate Analytics. The journal is ranked 4th out of 174 in ecology journals and 11th out of 279 in environmental sciences journals. Its impact factor for 2021 is reported as 13.789, which further demonstrates its influence and importance in the scientific community.
期刊最新文献
Cover Image Issue Information Bone gnawing in a Japanese squirrel Deoxygenation—coming to a water body near you Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1