Implementation of a people-like-me tool for personalized rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: A mixed methods pilot study

Jeremy Graber, Lauren Hinrichs-Kinney, Laura Churchill, Daniel D Matlock, Andrew J Kittelson, Adam Lutz, Michael Bade, Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley
{"title":"Implementation of a people-like-me tool for personalized rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: A mixed methods pilot study","authors":"Jeremy Graber, Lauren Hinrichs-Kinney, Laura Churchill, Daniel D Matlock, Andrew J Kittelson, Adam Lutz, Michael Bade, Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.20.24309245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective\nWe piloted a decision support tool that promotes a people-like-me (PLM) approach to rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The PLM approach encourages person centered care by using historical outcomes data from similar (past) patients as a template of what to expect for a new patient. In this study, we evaluated how successfully the PLM tool was implemented and examined contextual factors that may have influenced its implementation. Methods\nTwo outpatient physical therapy clinics (Clinics A and B) piloted the PLM tool from September 2020 to December 2022. We gathered data related to its implementation from multiple sources including the electronic health record, the tool itself, and surveys and interviews with patients and clinicians. We based our primary outcomes on the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance), and we set pre-defined targets for a subset of these outcomes. We used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design to analyze the data overall and separately by each clinic. Results\nOverall, the clinics met implementation targets related to Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, and fidelity, but did not use the tool as frequently as intended. Both clinics identified time, technology, and scheduling barriers to using the tool, but Clinic A scored higher in nearly every outcome. Clinic As success may have been related to its clinicians higher level of experience, more positive attitudes towards the tool, and more active approach to implementation compared to Clinic B clinicians. Conclusions\nThe clinics met most of our pre-specified RE-AIM targets, but Clinic A experienced more implementation success than Clinic B. Future efforts to implement this PLM tool should (1) mitigate time, technology, and scheduling barriers, (2) engage clinicians as active implementation participants, (3) enhance or better communicate the tools usefulness to increase clinician uptake, and (4) refine the tools design to alter clinician behavior more effectively.","PeriodicalId":501453,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.20.24309245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective We piloted a decision support tool that promotes a people-like-me (PLM) approach to rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The PLM approach encourages person centered care by using historical outcomes data from similar (past) patients as a template of what to expect for a new patient. In this study, we evaluated how successfully the PLM tool was implemented and examined contextual factors that may have influenced its implementation. Methods Two outpatient physical therapy clinics (Clinics A and B) piloted the PLM tool from September 2020 to December 2022. We gathered data related to its implementation from multiple sources including the electronic health record, the tool itself, and surveys and interviews with patients and clinicians. We based our primary outcomes on the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance), and we set pre-defined targets for a subset of these outcomes. We used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design to analyze the data overall and separately by each clinic. Results Overall, the clinics met implementation targets related to Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, and fidelity, but did not use the tool as frequently as intended. Both clinics identified time, technology, and scheduling barriers to using the tool, but Clinic A scored higher in nearly every outcome. Clinic As success may have been related to its clinicians higher level of experience, more positive attitudes towards the tool, and more active approach to implementation compared to Clinic B clinicians. Conclusions The clinics met most of our pre-specified RE-AIM targets, but Clinic A experienced more implementation success than Clinic B. Future efforts to implement this PLM tool should (1) mitigate time, technology, and scheduling barriers, (2) engage clinicians as active implementation participants, (3) enhance or better communicate the tools usefulness to increase clinician uptake, and (4) refine the tools design to alter clinician behavior more effectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为全膝关节置换术后的个性化康复实施 "类人 "工具:混合方法试点研究
目的我们试用了一种决策支持工具,该工具提倡在全膝关节置换术(TKA)后采用 "类人"(PLM)康复方法。PLM方法鼓励以人为本的护理,将类似(过去)患者的历史疗效数据作为新患者预期疗效的模板。在本研究中,我们评估了 PLM 工具的成功实施情况,并研究了可能影响其实施的背景因素。方法2020 年 9 月至 2022 年 12 月期间,两家门诊理疗诊所(诊所 A 和诊所 B)试用了 PLM 工具。我们从多个渠道收集了与该工具实施相关的数据,包括电子健康记录、工具本身以及对患者和临床医生的调查和访谈。我们的主要结果基于 RE-AIM 框架(覆盖、有效性、采用、实施和维护),并为这些结果的子集设定了预定义目标。我们采用了解释性顺序混合方法设计来分析整体数据和各诊所的单独数据。结果总体而言,诊所达到了与 "到达率"、"有效性"、"采用率 "和 "忠实度 "相关的实施目标,但工具的使用频率未达到预期。两家诊所都发现了使用该工具的时间、技术和日程安排障碍,但诊所 A 在几乎所有结果上都得分较高。与 B 诊所的临床医生相比,A 诊所的成功可能与其临床医生的经验水平更高、对工具的态度更积极、实施方法更主动有关。结论这些诊所达到了我们预先设定的 RE-AIM 目标中的大部分目标,但 A 诊所比 B 诊所的实施成功率更高。未来实施 PLM 工具的工作应:(1)减少时间、技术和日程安排方面的障碍;(2)让临床医生积极参与实施工作;(3)加强或更好地宣传工具的实用性,以提高临床医生的使用率;(4)完善工具设计,以更有效地改变临床医生的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS: INTERPRETATION OF NON-STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT RESULTS IN RANDOMISED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS IN REHABILITATION Targeted deep brain stimulation of the motor thalamus improves speech and swallowing motor functions after cerebral lesions Normal feeding movements expressed by dimensionality reduction of whole-body joint motions using principal component analysis Impact of early postoperative ambulation on gait recovery after hip fracture surgery: A multicenter cohort study Backward Locomotor Treadmill Training on Walking and Balance Outcomes in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1