Multi-joint approach for assessing lower limb proprioception: reliability and precision in school-aged children

Nina Jacobs, Maud van den Bogaart, Ann Hallemans, Pieter Meyns
{"title":"Multi-joint approach for assessing lower limb proprioception: reliability and precision in school-aged children","authors":"Nina Jacobs, Maud van den Bogaart, Ann Hallemans, Pieter Meyns","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.19.24308933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Joint Position Reproduction (JPR) approach has been commonly used to assess joint position sense (JPS), however, no prior study investigated its psychometric properties in children. This study aimed to assess the reliability and precision of a newly developed multi–joint JPR protocol for assessing lower limb JPS in school-aged typically developing (TD) children. Methods: Ankle, knee and hip JPS was assessed in TD children (aged 5–12 years), on two different days, by a single rater using a standardized JPR protocol (re–identification of a passively placed target position of the ipsilateral joint). The mean and best error(JRE,°) between target and reproduction angle were calculated from three–dimensional(3D) kinematics for each tested joint on both sides for three trials. Furthermore, total, joint– and limb–JRE scores were provided for clinical use. For JPR–reliability, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient(ICC,2.1) was reported. For JPR–precision, the standard error of measurement (SEM) was calculated. Results: 270 JPR trials were assessed in 15 TD children (8.6±1.2 years,8boys). The mean and best JRE, summarized for all joints for test and retest, was 3.7° and 2.5°, respectively. The ICC were poor to fair(0.01–0.44) for mean JRE, but fair to very good(0.46–0.77) for best JRE. The SEM ranged from 0.8°–1.8°, depending on the joint and side being tested. Conclusion: Evaluating ankle, knee and hip JPS in children, using passive JPR, is more reliable and precise when using the best JRE. This study highlights the need for a multi–joint JPR approach in research and clinics, and provides joint- and limb-specific SEM values. Keywords: Assessment; Proprioception; Joint Position Sense; Reliability; Precision","PeriodicalId":501453,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.19.24308933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Joint Position Reproduction (JPR) approach has been commonly used to assess joint position sense (JPS), however, no prior study investigated its psychometric properties in children. This study aimed to assess the reliability and precision of a newly developed multi–joint JPR protocol for assessing lower limb JPS in school-aged typically developing (TD) children. Methods: Ankle, knee and hip JPS was assessed in TD children (aged 5–12 years), on two different days, by a single rater using a standardized JPR protocol (re–identification of a passively placed target position of the ipsilateral joint). The mean and best error(JRE,°) between target and reproduction angle were calculated from three–dimensional(3D) kinematics for each tested joint on both sides for three trials. Furthermore, total, joint– and limb–JRE scores were provided for clinical use. For JPR–reliability, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient(ICC,2.1) was reported. For JPR–precision, the standard error of measurement (SEM) was calculated. Results: 270 JPR trials were assessed in 15 TD children (8.6±1.2 years,8boys). The mean and best JRE, summarized for all joints for test and retest, was 3.7° and 2.5°, respectively. The ICC were poor to fair(0.01–0.44) for mean JRE, but fair to very good(0.46–0.77) for best JRE. The SEM ranged from 0.8°–1.8°, depending on the joint and side being tested. Conclusion: Evaluating ankle, knee and hip JPS in children, using passive JPR, is more reliable and precise when using the best JRE. This study highlights the need for a multi–joint JPR approach in research and clinics, and provides joint- and limb-specific SEM values. Keywords: Assessment; Proprioception; Joint Position Sense; Reliability; Precision
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估下肢本体感觉的多关节方法:学龄儿童的可靠性和精确性
背景:关节位置再现(JPR)方法已被普遍用于评估关节位置感(JPS),但之前没有研究对其在儿童中的心理测量特性进行过调查。本研究旨在评估新开发的用于评估学龄典型发育(TD)儿童下肢关节位置感的多关节 JPR 方案的可靠性和精确性。方法:在两个不同的日期,由一名评分者使用标准化的 JPR 方案(重新识别同侧关节被动放置的目标位置)对 TD 儿童(5-12 岁)的踝关节、膝关节和髋关节 JPS 进行评估。通过三维(3D)运动学计算出了三次试验中每个受测关节两侧的目标角与再现角之间的平均误差和最佳误差(JRE,°)。此外,还提供了用于临床的总分、关节分和肢体分。在 JPR 可靠性方面,报告了类内相关系数(ICC,2.1)。对于 JPR 精确度,则计算测量标准误差 (SEM)。结果:对 15 名 TD 儿童(8.6±1.2 岁,8 名男孩)的 270 次 JPR 试验进行了评估。所有关节测试和复测的平均和最佳 JRE 分别为 3.7° 和 2.5°。平均 JRE 的 ICC 从较差到一般(0.01-0.44),但最佳 JRE 的 ICC 从一般到非常好(0.46-0.77)。SEM在0.8°-1.8°之间,取决于测试的关节和侧边。结论使用被动式 JPR 评估儿童踝关节、膝关节和髋关节 JPS 时,使用最佳 JRE 更可靠、更精确。本研究强调了在研究和临床中采用多关节 JPR 方法的必要性,并提供了特定关节和肢体的 SEM 值。关键词评估;运动感觉;关节位置感;可靠性;精确性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS: INTERPRETATION OF NON-STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT RESULTS IN RANDOMISED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS IN REHABILITATION Targeted deep brain stimulation of the motor thalamus improves speech and swallowing motor functions after cerebral lesions Normal feeding movements expressed by dimensionality reduction of whole-body joint motions using principal component analysis Impact of early postoperative ambulation on gait recovery after hip fracture surgery: A multicenter cohort study Backward Locomotor Treadmill Training on Walking and Balance Outcomes in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1