Utilizing artificial intelligence techniques for soil depth prediction and its influences in landslide hazard modeling

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1007/s00477-024-02765-5
Ananta Man Singh Pradhan, Suchita Shrestha, Jung-Hyun Lee, In-Tak Hwang, Hyuck-Jin Park
{"title":"Utilizing artificial intelligence techniques for soil depth prediction and its influences in landslide hazard modeling","authors":"Ananta Man Singh Pradhan, Suchita Shrestha, Jung-Hyun Lee, In-Tak Hwang, Hyuck-Jin Park","doi":"10.1007/s00477-024-02765-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil depth plays a pivotal role in determining hillslope stability, understanding hydrogeology, promoting optimal vegetation growth, and comprehensively elucidating soil erosion dynamics. In this study, two robust artificial intelligence methodologies, quantile regression forest (QRF) and deep neural network (DNN), were employed to predict spatial variations in soil depth across a digital terrain. Particularly during periods of intense rainfall, shallow landslides pose recurrent threats to human safety and property integrity. Thus, the identification of potential landslide-prone regions becomes imperative for mitigating associated risks. During slope stability analyses, soil depth assumes significance; nonetheless, data regarding soil depth from areas prone to landslides are rarely obtained. The main objective of this study is to explore the impact of incorporating soil depth spatial distributions on the predictive capabilities of shallow landslide model within a given terrain. By leveraging two distinct spatial soil depth distributions, a comprehensive analysis of slope stability analysis was conducted. The significance of soil depth spatial distribution, particularly when employing DNN-generated data, is underscored in refining predictions and preventing overestimations of landslide-prone or stable regions. Notably, integration of DNN-derived soil depth data into the infinite slope model yielded a marked enhancement in the accuracy of factor of safety (FS) distributions, achieving an impressive 86.9% accuracy rate while QRF-derived FS has shown 74.7% accuracy. This analytical approach, while straightforward, offers a powerful tool for evaluating slope instability and forecasting shallow landslides, thereby facilitating proactive mitigation measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":21987,"journal":{"name":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-024-02765-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil depth plays a pivotal role in determining hillslope stability, understanding hydrogeology, promoting optimal vegetation growth, and comprehensively elucidating soil erosion dynamics. In this study, two robust artificial intelligence methodologies, quantile regression forest (QRF) and deep neural network (DNN), were employed to predict spatial variations in soil depth across a digital terrain. Particularly during periods of intense rainfall, shallow landslides pose recurrent threats to human safety and property integrity. Thus, the identification of potential landslide-prone regions becomes imperative for mitigating associated risks. During slope stability analyses, soil depth assumes significance; nonetheless, data regarding soil depth from areas prone to landslides are rarely obtained. The main objective of this study is to explore the impact of incorporating soil depth spatial distributions on the predictive capabilities of shallow landslide model within a given terrain. By leveraging two distinct spatial soil depth distributions, a comprehensive analysis of slope stability analysis was conducted. The significance of soil depth spatial distribution, particularly when employing DNN-generated data, is underscored in refining predictions and preventing overestimations of landslide-prone or stable regions. Notably, integration of DNN-derived soil depth data into the infinite slope model yielded a marked enhancement in the accuracy of factor of safety (FS) distributions, achieving an impressive 86.9% accuracy rate while QRF-derived FS has shown 74.7% accuracy. This analytical approach, while straightforward, offers a powerful tool for evaluating slope instability and forecasting shallow landslides, thereby facilitating proactive mitigation measures.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用人工智能技术预测土壤深度及其对滑坡灾害建模的影响
土壤深度在决定山坡稳定性、了解水文地质、促进植被最佳生长以及全面阐明土壤侵蚀动态方面起着关键作用。本研究采用量子回归森林(QRF)和深度神经网络(DNN)这两种稳健的人工智能方法来预测数字地形上土壤深度的空间变化。特别是在强降雨期间,浅层滑坡经常对人类安全和财产完整性造成威胁。因此,识别潜在的滑坡易发区域是降低相关风险的当务之急。在斜坡稳定性分析过程中,土壤深度具有重要意义;然而,有关易发生滑坡地区土壤深度的数据却很少获得。本研究的主要目的是探索在给定地形中,土壤深度空间分布对浅层滑坡模型预测能力的影响。通过利用两种不同的土壤深度空间分布,对边坡稳定性分析进行了综合分析。土壤深度空间分布,尤其是采用 DNN 生成的数据时,在完善预测和防止高估滑坡易发区或稳定区方面的重要性得到了强调。值得注意的是,将 DNN 导出的土壤深度数据集成到无限坡度模型中,可显著提高安全系数(FS)分布的准确性,准确率高达 86.9%,而 QRF 导出的安全系数准确率仅为 74.7%。这种分析方法简单明了,是评估斜坡不稳定性和预测浅层滑坡的有力工具,有助于采取积极的缓解措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment (SERRA) will publish research papers, reviews and technical notes on stochastic and probabilistic approaches to environmental sciences and engineering, including interactions of earth and atmospheric environments with people and ecosystems. The basic idea is to bring together research papers on stochastic modelling in various fields of environmental sciences and to provide an interdisciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas, for communicating on issues that cut across disciplinary barriers, and for the dissemination of stochastic techniques used in different fields to the community of interested researchers. Original contributions will be considered dealing with modelling (theoretical and computational), measurements and instrumentation in one or more of the following topical areas: - Spatiotemporal analysis and mapping of natural processes. - Enviroinformatics. - Environmental risk assessment, reliability analysis and decision making. - Surface and subsurface hydrology and hydraulics. - Multiphase porous media domains and contaminant transport modelling. - Hazardous waste site characterization. - Stochastic turbulence and random hydrodynamic fields. - Chaotic and fractal systems. - Random waves and seafloor morphology. - Stochastic atmospheric and climate processes. - Air pollution and quality assessment research. - Modern geostatistics. - Mechanisms of pollutant formation, emission, exposure and absorption. - Physical, chemical and biological analysis of human exposure from single and multiple media and routes; control and protection. - Bioinformatics. - Probabilistic methods in ecology and population biology. - Epidemiological investigations. - Models using stochastic differential equations stochastic or partial differential equations. - Hazardous waste site characterization.
期刊最新文献
Hybrid method for rainfall-induced regional landslide susceptibility mapping Prediction of urban flood inundation using Bayesian convolutional neural networks Unravelling complexities: a study on geopolitical dynamics, economic complexity, R&D impact on green innovation in China AHP and FAHP-based multi-criteria analysis for suitable dam location analysis: a case study of the Bagmati Basin, Nepal Risk and retraction: asymmetric nexus between monetary policy uncertainty and eco-friendly investment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1