Professional learning for preservice science teachers: shifts in self-regulated learning practices and questioning skills

IF 3.9 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Metacognition and Learning Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1007/s11409-024-09390-1
Hong H. Tran, Daniel K. Capps, Timothy J. Cleary
{"title":"Professional learning for preservice science teachers: shifts in self-regulated learning practices and questioning skills","authors":"Hong H. Tran, Daniel K. Capps, Timothy J. Cleary","doi":"10.1007/s11409-024-09390-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This multi-case study investigated self-regulation of preservice science teachers’ (PSTs), focusing on their ability to learn from their own teaching experiences and to regulate teaching practices to pose higher-level cognitive questions. The participants were three PSTs enrolled in a certification program for teaching secondary science, representing low, intermediate, and high self-regulated learning (SRL). Data were collected from classroom materials, semi-structured interviews on planning classroom questions, classroom observations, classroom audio recordings, and semi-structured interviews on enacting questions. The findings revealed that while each case exhibited unique characteristics, all PSTs demonstrated improvements in their SRL practices and questioning. The analysis highlighted PSTs’ SRL practices in planning and enacting classroom questions, suggesting ways to enhance PSTs’ questioning skills through the integration of SRL into teacher preparation. Furthermore, the findings underscored the importance of university supervisors and cooperating teachers tailoring their coaching to PSTs based on their initial SRL skills and utilizing well-defined models of SRL development for guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47385,"journal":{"name":"Metacognition and Learning","volume":"217 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metacognition and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09390-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This multi-case study investigated self-regulation of preservice science teachers’ (PSTs), focusing on their ability to learn from their own teaching experiences and to regulate teaching practices to pose higher-level cognitive questions. The participants were three PSTs enrolled in a certification program for teaching secondary science, representing low, intermediate, and high self-regulated learning (SRL). Data were collected from classroom materials, semi-structured interviews on planning classroom questions, classroom observations, classroom audio recordings, and semi-structured interviews on enacting questions. The findings revealed that while each case exhibited unique characteristics, all PSTs demonstrated improvements in their SRL practices and questioning. The analysis highlighted PSTs’ SRL practices in planning and enacting classroom questions, suggesting ways to enhance PSTs’ questioning skills through the integration of SRL into teacher preparation. Furthermore, the findings underscored the importance of university supervisors and cooperating teachers tailoring their coaching to PSTs based on their initial SRL skills and utilizing well-defined models of SRL development for guidance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职前科学教师的专业学习:自我调节学习方法和提问技巧的转变
这项多案例研究调查了职前科学教师(PSTs)的自我调节能力,重点关注他们从自身教学经验中学习和调节教学实践以提出更高层次认知问题的能力。研究对象是三名就读于中学科学教学认证课程的职前科学教师,分别代表低、中、高自我调节学习(SRL)水平。研究人员从课堂材料、关于课堂问题计划的半结构化访谈、课堂观察、课堂录音以及关于问题实施的半结构化访谈中收集数据。研究结果表明,虽然每个案例都呈现出独特的特点,但所有 PST 在自律学习实践和提问方面都有所改进。分析强调了 PSTs 在计划和提出课堂问题方面的自 我学习实践,提出了通过将自学能力纳入教师培训来提高 PSTs 提问技能的方法。此外,研究结果还强调了大学督导和合作教师根据 PST 最初的自学能力和利用明确的自学能力发展模式进行指导的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
15.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The journal "Metacognition and Learning" addresses various components of metacognition, such as metacognitive awareness, experiences, knowledge, and executive skills. Both general metacognition as well as domain-specific metacognitions in various task domains (mathematics, physics, reading, writing etc.) are considered. Papers may address fundamental theoretical issues, measurement issues regarding both quantitative and qualitative methods, as well as empirical studies about individual differences in metacognition, relations with other learner characteristics and learning strategies, developmental issues, the training of metacognition components in learning, and the teacher’s role in metacognition training. Studies highlighting the role of metacognition in self- or co-regulated learning as well as its relations with motivation and affect are also welcomed. Submitted papers are judged on theoretical relevance, methodological thoroughness, and appeal to an international audience. The journal aims for a high academic standard with relevance to the field of educational practices. One restriction is that papers should pertain to the role of metacognition in learning situations. Self-regulation in clinical settings, such as coping with phobia or anxiety outside learning situations, is beyond the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge exploration among students: role of feedback, feeling of confidence, and academic motivation Self-regulated strategy development’s effectiveness: underlying cognitive and metacognitive mechanisms Development of metacognitive monitoring and control skills in elementary school: a latent profile approach Metacognitive reflections on essentialism during the learning of the relationship between biology and the human race On the confidence-accuracy relationship in memory: inferential, direct access, or indirect access?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1