Selection of digital fabrication technique in the construction industry—A multi-criteria decision-making approach

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1007/s11709-024-1075-1
M. P. Salaimanimagudam, J. Jayaprakash
{"title":"Selection of digital fabrication technique in the construction industry—A multi-criteria decision-making approach","authors":"M. P. Salaimanimagudam, J. Jayaprakash","doi":"10.1007/s11709-024-1075-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital fabrication techniques, in recent decades, have provided the basis of a sustainable revolution in the construction industry. However, selecting the digital fabrication method in terms of manufacturability and functionality requirements is a complex problem. This paper presents alternatives and criteria for selection of digital fabrication techniques by adopting the multi-criteria decision-making technique. The alternatives considered in the study are concrete three-dimensional (3D) printing, shotcrete, smart dynamic casting, material intrusion, mesh molding, injection concrete 3D printing, and thin forming techniques. The criteria include formwork utilization, reinforcement incorporation, geometrical complexity, material enhancement, assembly complexity, surface finish, and build area. It demonstrates different multi-criteria decision-making techniques, with both subjective and objective weighting methods. The given ranking is based on the current condition of digital fabrication in the construction industry. The study reveals that in the selection of digital fabrication techniques, the criteria including reinforcement incorporation, build area, and geometrical complexity play a pivotal role, collectively accounting for nearly 70% of the overall weighting. Among the evaluated techniques, concrete 3D printing emerged as the best performer, however the shotcrete and mesh molding techniques in the second and third positions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12476,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-1075-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital fabrication techniques, in recent decades, have provided the basis of a sustainable revolution in the construction industry. However, selecting the digital fabrication method in terms of manufacturability and functionality requirements is a complex problem. This paper presents alternatives and criteria for selection of digital fabrication techniques by adopting the multi-criteria decision-making technique. The alternatives considered in the study are concrete three-dimensional (3D) printing, shotcrete, smart dynamic casting, material intrusion, mesh molding, injection concrete 3D printing, and thin forming techniques. The criteria include formwork utilization, reinforcement incorporation, geometrical complexity, material enhancement, assembly complexity, surface finish, and build area. It demonstrates different multi-criteria decision-making techniques, with both subjective and objective weighting methods. The given ranking is based on the current condition of digital fabrication in the construction industry. The study reveals that in the selection of digital fabrication techniques, the criteria including reinforcement incorporation, build area, and geometrical complexity play a pivotal role, collectively accounting for nearly 70% of the overall weighting. Among the evaluated techniques, concrete 3D printing emerged as the best performer, however the shotcrete and mesh molding techniques in the second and third positions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑业数字制造技术的选择--一种多标准决策方法
近几十年来,数字制造技术为建筑业的可持续革命奠定了基础。然而,从可制造性和功能性要求的角度选择数字制造方法是一个复杂的问题。本文采用多标准决策技术,介绍了选择数字制造技术的替代方案和标准。研究中考虑的替代方法包括混凝土三维(3D)打印、喷射混凝土、智能动态浇注、材料侵入、网状成型、喷射混凝土 3D 打印和薄成型技术。标准包括模板利用率、加固、几何复杂性、材料增强、装配复杂性、表面光洁度和建筑面积。它展示了不同的多标准决策技术,包括主观和客观加权法。给出的排序是基于建筑行业数字化制造的现状。研究表明,在选择数字化制造技术时,包括加固、建造面积和几何复杂性在内的标准起着关键作用,合计占总体权重的近 70%。在接受评估的技术中,混凝土三维打印技术表现最佳,而喷射混凝土和网状成型技术则分列第二和第三位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
734
期刊介绍: Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering is an international journal that publishes original research papers, review articles and case studies related to civil and structural engineering. Topics include but are not limited to the latest developments in building and bridge structures, geotechnical engineering, hydraulic engineering, coastal engineering, and transport engineering. Case studies that demonstrate the successful applications of cutting-edge research technologies are welcome. The journal also promotes and publishes interdisciplinary research and applications connecting civil engineering and other disciplines, such as bio-, info-, nano- and social sciences and technology. Manuscripts submitted for publication will be subject to a stringent peer review.
期刊最新文献
An artificial neural network based deep collocation method for the solution of transient linear and nonlinear partial differential equations Bibliographic survey and comprehensive review on mechanical and durability properties of microorganism based self-healing concrete Seismic response of pile-supported structures considering the coupling of inertial and kinematic interactions in different soil sites An isogeometric approach for nonlocal bending and free oscillation of magneto-electro-elastic functionally graded nanobeam with elastic constraints Shaking table test on a tunnel-group metro station in rock site under harmonic excitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1