Management of Distal Femoral Non-union: A Systematic Review

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1007/s43465-024-01205-4
Filippo Migliorini, Luise Schäfer, Francesco Simeone, Abhishek Vaish, Janki Sharan Bhadani, Raju Vaishya
{"title":"Management of Distal Femoral Non-union: A Systematic Review","authors":"Filippo Migliorini, Luise Schäfer, Francesco Simeone, Abhishek Vaish, Janki Sharan Bhadani, Raju Vaishya","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01205-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Managing distal femur fracture nonunion is complex, with unpredictable results. The present investigation systematically updates current evidence, reviews existing modalities, innovations and related outcomes, and discusses future perspectives on the management of nonunion of the distal femur.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the 2020 PRISMA statement. In April 2024, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase were accessed without time constraints. No additional filters were used in the database search. All the clinical studies investigating treatment options for nonunion of distal femur fractures were accessed.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>35 clinical studies (832 patients) were included. Of them, 34.2% (239 of 698 patients) reported an open fracture, and 24.5% (78 of 319 patients) reported infection at the fracture site. The mean length of the follow-up was 28.9 ± 13.2 months. The mean age of the patients was 53.8 ± 14.7 years.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>84.5% (703 of 832) of patients reached complete union without major complications, and 3.8% (32 of 832) reached complete union with major complications at a mean of 21.7 ± 20.9 months. 8.7% (72 of 832) patients showed signs of persistent non-union.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Level of evidence</h3><p>Level III, systematic review.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01205-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Managing distal femur fracture nonunion is complex, with unpredictable results. The present investigation systematically updates current evidence, reviews existing modalities, innovations and related outcomes, and discusses future perspectives on the management of nonunion of the distal femur.

Methods

This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the 2020 PRISMA statement. In April 2024, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase were accessed without time constraints. No additional filters were used in the database search. All the clinical studies investigating treatment options for nonunion of distal femur fractures were accessed.

Results

35 clinical studies (832 patients) were included. Of them, 34.2% (239 of 698 patients) reported an open fracture, and 24.5% (78 of 319 patients) reported infection at the fracture site. The mean length of the follow-up was 28.9 ± 13.2 months. The mean age of the patients was 53.8 ± 14.7 years.

Conclusion

84.5% (703 of 832) of patients reached complete union without major complications, and 3.8% (32 of 832) reached complete union with major complications at a mean of 21.7 ± 20.9 months. 8.7% (72 of 832) patients showed signs of persistent non-union.

Level of evidence

Level III, systematic review.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股骨远端非脱位的治疗:系统回顾
导言股骨远端骨折不愈合的治疗非常复杂,结果难以预料。本研究系统地更新了现有证据,回顾了现有模式、创新和相关结果,并探讨了股骨远端骨折不愈合治疗的未来前景。方法本研究根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目:2020 PRISMA声明》进行。2024 年 4 月,在没有时间限制的情况下访问了 PubMed、Web of Science、Google Scholar 和 Embase。数据库检索中未使用额外的筛选器。结果共纳入 35 项临床研究(832 名患者)。其中,34.2%(698 例患者中的 239 例)报告了开放性骨折,24.5%(319 例患者中的 78 例)报告了骨折部位感染。平均随访时间为 28.9±13.2 个月。结论84.5%的患者(832 例中的 703 例)在平均 21.7 ± 20.9 个月后达到完全愈合,无重大并发症;3.8%的患者(832 例中的 32 例)在平均 21.7 ± 20.9 个月后达到完全愈合,有重大并发症。8.7%的患者(832 例中有 72 例)出现了持续不愈合的迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
期刊最新文献
Nonunion of Fractures: A Review of Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Clinical Features in Recent Literature Can a Surgical Vulnerability Score Predict Outcomes of Hip Reconstruction in Children with Severe Neuromuscular Disability? Location of the Anatomic Footprint Centers of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Determined by Quadrant Method on Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging The Use of Nitinol Continuous Compression Implants in Orthopaedic Trauma A Modern-Day Algorithm for the Treatment of Multi-Ligament Knee Injuries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1