Measures of wave intensity as non-invasive surrogate for cardiac function predicts mortality in hemodialysis patients

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical Kidney Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfae172
Christopher C Mayer, Pantelis A Sarafidis, Julia Matschkal, Marieta Theodorakopoulou, Georg Lorenz, Artemios Karagiannidis, Susanne Angermann, Fotini Iatridi, Matthias C Braunisch, Antonios Karpetas, Marcus Baumann, Eva Pella, Uwe Heemann, Siegfried Wassertheurer, Christoph Schmaderer
{"title":"Measures of wave intensity as non-invasive surrogate for cardiac function predicts mortality in hemodialysis patients","authors":"Christopher C Mayer, Pantelis A Sarafidis, Julia Matschkal, Marieta Theodorakopoulou, Georg Lorenz, Artemios Karagiannidis, Susanne Angermann, Fotini Iatridi, Matthias C Braunisch, Antonios Karpetas, Marcus Baumann, Eva Pella, Uwe Heemann, Siegfried Wassertheurer, Christoph Schmaderer","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfae172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and hypothesis Risk prediction in hemodialysis patients is challenging due to the impact of the dialysis regime on patient's volume status and the complex interplay with cardiac function, comorbidities, and hypertension status. Cardiac function as a key predictor of cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients is challenging to assess in daily routine. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the association of a novel, non-invasive relative index of systolic function with mortality and to assess its interplay with volume removal. Methods In total, 558 (373 male/185 female) hemodialysis patients with a median age of 66 years were included in this analysis. They underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring including wave intensity analysis (i.e. S to D ratio (SDR)). All-cause and cardiovascular mortality served as endpoints, and multivariate, proportional hazards models were used for risk prediction. Intra-dialytic changes were analyzed in tertiles according to ultrafiltration volume. During a follow-up of 37.8 months, 193 patients died (92 due to cardiovascular reasons). Results SDR was significantly associated with all-cause (univariate HR = 1.36 [1.20–1.54]; p < 0.001) and cardiovascular (univariate HR = 1.41 [1.20–1.67]; p < 0.001) mortality. The associations remained significant in multivariate analysis accounting for possible confounders. Changes in SDR from pre-/early- to post-dialytic averages were significantly different for the three ultrafiltration volume groups. Conclusion This study provides well-powered evidence for the independent association of a novel index of systolic function with mortality. Furthermore, it revealed a significant association between intradialytic changes of the measure and intradialytic volume removal.","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and hypothesis Risk prediction in hemodialysis patients is challenging due to the impact of the dialysis regime on patient's volume status and the complex interplay with cardiac function, comorbidities, and hypertension status. Cardiac function as a key predictor of cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients is challenging to assess in daily routine. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the association of a novel, non-invasive relative index of systolic function with mortality and to assess its interplay with volume removal. Methods In total, 558 (373 male/185 female) hemodialysis patients with a median age of 66 years were included in this analysis. They underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring including wave intensity analysis (i.e. S to D ratio (SDR)). All-cause and cardiovascular mortality served as endpoints, and multivariate, proportional hazards models were used for risk prediction. Intra-dialytic changes were analyzed in tertiles according to ultrafiltration volume. During a follow-up of 37.8 months, 193 patients died (92 due to cardiovascular reasons). Results SDR was significantly associated with all-cause (univariate HR = 1.36 [1.20–1.54]; p < 0.001) and cardiovascular (univariate HR = 1.41 [1.20–1.67]; p < 0.001) mortality. The associations remained significant in multivariate analysis accounting for possible confounders. Changes in SDR from pre-/early- to post-dialytic averages were significantly different for the three ultrafiltration volume groups. Conclusion This study provides well-powered evidence for the independent association of a novel index of systolic function with mortality. Furthermore, it revealed a significant association between intradialytic changes of the measure and intradialytic volume removal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为心脏功能无创替代指标的波强度测量可预测血液透析患者的死亡率
背景与假设 血液透析患者的风险预测具有挑战性,这是因为透析制度对患者的容量状态有影响,而且与心脏功能、合并症和高血压状态之间存在复杂的相互作用。心功能是预测血液透析患者心血管疾病死亡率的关键指标,在日常评估中具有挑战性。因此,本研究旨在调查一种新型、无创的收缩功能相对指数与死亡率之间的关系,并评估其与容量去除之间的相互作用。方法 共有 558 名(373 名男性/185 名女性)中位年龄为 66 岁的血液透析患者参与了此次分析。他们接受了 24 小时动态血压监测,包括血压波强度分析(即 S-D 比值 (SDR))。以全因死亡率和心血管死亡率为终点,采用多变量比例危险模型进行风险预测。根据超滤量对透析内的变化进行了分层分析。在 37.8 个月的随访期间,193 名患者死亡(92 人死于心血管疾病)。结果 SDR 与全因死亡率(单变量 HR = 1.36 [1.20-1.54];pamp &;lt;0.001)和心血管死亡率(单变量 HR = 1.41 [1.20-1.67];pamp &;lt;0.001)明显相关。在考虑了可能的混杂因素后进行的多变量分析中,这些关联仍然显著。三个超滤量组的 SDR 从治疗前/早期到治疗后平均值的变化有显著差异。结论 本研究提供了有力证据,证明收缩功能的新指标与死亡率之间存在独立关联。此外,它还揭示了该指标在透析内的变化与透析内容量去除之间的重要关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Kidney Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
期刊最新文献
Apolipoprotein B-48 and late graft failure in kidney transplant recipients Cerebral white matter injury in hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional tract-based spatial statistics and fixel-based analysis Efficacy and safety of telitacicept, a BLyS/APRIL dual inhibitor, in the treatment of IgA nephropathy: a retrospective case-control study Basiliximab induction alone vs. a dual ATG-Basiliximab approach in first live-donor non-sensitized kidney transplant recipients with low HLA matching Ten tips to carry out video consultations in nephrology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1