Protected characteristics reported in pulmonary rehabilitation: a scoping review

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1183/16000617.0236-2023
Holly Drover, Lucy Gardiner, Sally J. Singh, Rachael A. Evans, Enya Daynes, Mark W. Orme
{"title":"Protected characteristics reported in pulmonary rehabilitation: a scoping review","authors":"Holly Drover, Lucy Gardiner, Sally J. Singh, Rachael A. Evans, Enya Daynes, Mark W. Orme","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0236-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<sec><st>Background:</st>\n<p>An individual's characteristics are reported to influence access, completion and outcomes of pulmonary rehabilitation and may contribute to health inequalities. Many countries have policies to promote equity among individuals&rsquo; characteristics, including the UK Equality Act 2010 which lists nine protected characteristics (age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex and sexual orientation).</p>\n</sec>\n<sec><st>Objectives:</st>\n<p>To describe the extent to which UK Equality Act 2010 protected characteristics have been collected and reported in UK studies and audits of pulmonary rehabilitation.</p>\n</sec>\n<sec><st>Methods:</st>\n<p>A scoping review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews guidelines was conducted using five databases. UK studies and audits collecting data on pulmonary rehabilitation from 1 October 2010 (date of Equality Act 2010 inception) were eligible. The protected characteristics collected and how they were reported were extracted.</p>\n</sec>\n<sec><st>Results:</st>\n<p>Out of 45 included studies and audits (41 studies and four audits), 98% (k=44) reported age. Sex was reported in 40% (k=18), and 20% (k=9) reported gender with only male and female categories. Half (50%, k=2) of audits reported gender with male, female and transgender categories. Race was reported through ethnicity in 2% (k=1) of studies and 75% (k=3) of audits. No studies or audits explicitly reported disability, but all reported measures indicating disease severity (<I>e.g.</I> forced expiratory volume in 1&nbsp;s % predicted: 67%, k=30). No studies or audits reported marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, religion or belief or sexual orientation.</p>\n</sec>\n<sec><st>Conclusions:</st>\n<p>Protected characteristics are not commonly reported or are inconsistently reported in UK pulmonary rehabilitation studies and audits. Without reporting these characteristics, health inequalities in pulmonary rehabilitation will remain unclear.</p>\n</sec>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0236-2023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:

An individual's characteristics are reported to influence access, completion and outcomes of pulmonary rehabilitation and may contribute to health inequalities. Many countries have policies to promote equity among individuals’ characteristics, including the UK Equality Act 2010 which lists nine protected characteristics (age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex and sexual orientation).

Objectives:

To describe the extent to which UK Equality Act 2010 protected characteristics have been collected and reported in UK studies and audits of pulmonary rehabilitation.

Methods:

A scoping review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews guidelines was conducted using five databases. UK studies and audits collecting data on pulmonary rehabilitation from 1 October 2010 (date of Equality Act 2010 inception) were eligible. The protected characteristics collected and how they were reported were extracted.

Results:

Out of 45 included studies and audits (41 studies and four audits), 98% (k=44) reported age. Sex was reported in 40% (k=18), and 20% (k=9) reported gender with only male and female categories. Half (50%, k=2) of audits reported gender with male, female and transgender categories. Race was reported through ethnicity in 2% (k=1) of studies and 75% (k=3) of audits. No studies or audits explicitly reported disability, but all reported measures indicating disease severity (e.g. forced expiratory volume in 1 s % predicted: 67%, k=30). No studies or audits reported marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, religion or belief or sexual orientation.

Conclusions:

Protected characteristics are not commonly reported or are inconsistently reported in UK pulmonary rehabilitation studies and audits. Without reporting these characteristics, health inequalities in pulmonary rehabilitation will remain unclear.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺康复中报告的受保护特征:范围界定审查
背景:据报道,个人特征会影响肺康复的获得、完成和结果,并可能导致健康不平等。目标:描述在英国肺康复研究和审计中收集和报告英国《2010 年平等法案》保护特征的程度。方法:使用五个数据库,按照《系统性综述的首选报告项目》和《范围界定综述的 Meta 分析》指南进行了范围界定综述。从 2010 年 10 月 1 日(《2010 年平等法案》生效日期)起收集肺康复数据的英国研究和审核符合条件。结果:在纳入的 45 项研究和审计(41 项研究和 4 项审计)中,98%(k=44)报告了年龄。40%的研究(k=18)报告了性别,20%的研究(k=9)只报告了男性和女性。半数(50%,k=2)的审核报告了性别,包括男性、女性和变性人类别。2%的研究(k=1)和 75%的审核(k=3)通过种族进行报告。没有研究或审核明确报告了残疾情况,但所有研究或审核都报告了表明疾病严重程度的指标(如 1 s 强迫呼气量预测百分比:67%,k=30)。没有任何研究或审核报告了婚姻和民事伴侣关系、怀孕和生育、宗教或信仰或性取向。结论:在英国的肺康复研究和审核中,受保护的特征并没有被普遍报告或报告不一致。如果不报告这些特征,肺康复中的健康不平等问题将仍然不明朗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
期刊最新文献
Advance care planning in patients with respiratory failure. Association between second-hand smoke exposure and lung cancer risk in never-smokers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Harmonising cellular conversations: decoding the vital roles of extracellular vesicles in respiratory system intercellular communications. Particulate matter-induced epigenetic modifications and lung complications. Predicting paediatric asthma exacerbations with machine learning: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1