Removal of calcium from water by zeolites with gravity-driven membrane filtration for water treatment without electricity†

IF 3.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1039/D4EW00438H
Dowon Chae, Kwang Pyo Son, Seung Mo Kang, Joowan Lim, Hosung Lee, Jin Lee, Seungjin Lee and Pyung-Kyu Park
{"title":"Removal of calcium from water by zeolites with gravity-driven membrane filtration for water treatment without electricity†","authors":"Dowon Chae, Kwang Pyo Son, Seung Mo Kang, Joowan Lim, Hosung Lee, Jin Lee, Seungjin Lee and Pyung-Kyu Park","doi":"10.1039/D4EW00438H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Hard water creates issues due to scaling that impacts industrial and domestic applications. Zeolite adsorption is an effective method for calcium removal. However, treated water requires additional filtration to remove suspended solids, which uses energy under traditional methods. Considering applications at sites where electricity is unavailable, this study removed calcium from water using zeolite adsorption and gravity-driven membrane (GDM) filtration. Four zeolite types were assessed: powdered (P1 and P2), bead-shaped (B) and granular (G). The properties of the zeolites significantly affected calcium removal and GDM filtration performance. Zeolites with low Si/Al ratios (high Al content) exhibited high Ca removal because negatively charged lattice sites were created by replacing Si with Al. P1 and B with Si/Al ratios of 1.40 and 1.49, respectively, exhibited high Ca-removal efficiencies of 92.6% and 99.8%. In contrast, P2 and G with high Si/Al ratios from 4.71–5.35 showed lower removal efficiency of 29.8–43.7%. The average sizes of P1, P2, B, and G were 9.68, 5.73, 2134, and 3639 μm, respectively. At similar Si/Al ratios, smaller particles exhibited faster adsorption rates. However, as the zeolite size decreased, the GDM flux decreased. During GDM filtration after zeolite adsorption, the permeate flux of water treated with large B and G zeolites was higher than that of water treated with small P1 and P2 zeolites. Finally, the zeolites were evaluated based on three criteria: Ca removal, GDM water flux, and price, which provides useful guidance for selecting appropriate zeolites.</p>","PeriodicalId":75,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","volume":" 10","pages":" 2357-2365"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ew/d4ew00438h","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hard water creates issues due to scaling that impacts industrial and domestic applications. Zeolite adsorption is an effective method for calcium removal. However, treated water requires additional filtration to remove suspended solids, which uses energy under traditional methods. Considering applications at sites where electricity is unavailable, this study removed calcium from water using zeolite adsorption and gravity-driven membrane (GDM) filtration. Four zeolite types were assessed: powdered (P1 and P2), bead-shaped (B) and granular (G). The properties of the zeolites significantly affected calcium removal and GDM filtration performance. Zeolites with low Si/Al ratios (high Al content) exhibited high Ca removal because negatively charged lattice sites were created by replacing Si with Al. P1 and B with Si/Al ratios of 1.40 and 1.49, respectively, exhibited high Ca-removal efficiencies of 92.6% and 99.8%. In contrast, P2 and G with high Si/Al ratios from 4.71–5.35 showed lower removal efficiency of 29.8–43.7%. The average sizes of P1, P2, B, and G were 9.68, 5.73, 2134, and 3639 μm, respectively. At similar Si/Al ratios, smaller particles exhibited faster adsorption rates. However, as the zeolite size decreased, the GDM flux decreased. During GDM filtration after zeolite adsorption, the permeate flux of water treated with large B and G zeolites was higher than that of water treated with small P1 and P2 zeolites. Finally, the zeolites were evaluated based on three criteria: Ca removal, GDM water flux, and price, which provides useful guidance for selecting appropriate zeolites.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用沸石和重力驱动膜过滤技术去除水中的钙,实现无电水处理
硬水会产生结垢问题,影响工业和家庭应用。沸石吸附是一种有效的除钙方法。然而,处理过的水需要额外过滤以去除悬浮固体,这在传统方法中需要消耗能源。考虑到在没有电的地方的应用,本研究使用沸石吸附和重力驱动膜(GDM)过滤去除水中的钙。研究评估了四种类型的沸石:粉状(P1 和 P2)、珠状(B)和粒状(G)。沸石的特性对钙的去除和 GDM 过滤性能有很大影响。低硅/铝比(高铝含量)的沸石具有较高的钙去除率,这是因为用铝取代硅后产生了带负电荷的晶格位点。硅/铝比率分别为 1.40 和 1.49 的 P1 和 B 的钙去除率高达 92.6% 和 99.8%。相比之下,硅/铝比为 4.71-5.35 的 P2 和 G 的脱钙效率较低,仅为 29.8-43.7%。P1、P2、B 和 G 的平均尺寸分别为 9.68、5.73、2134 和 3639 µm。在相似的硅/铝比率下,较小的颗粒表现出更快的吸附率。然而,随着沸石尺寸的减小,GDM 通量也随之降低。在沸石吸附后的 GDM 过滤过程中,用大 B 和大 G 沸石处理的水的渗透通量高于用小 P1 和小 P2 沸石处理的水的渗透通量。最后,根据三个标准对沸石进行了评估:这为选择合适的沸石提供了有用的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL SC-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
206
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology seeks to showcase high quality research about fundamental science, innovative technologies, and management practices that promote sustainable water.
期刊最新文献
Back cover Wastewater surveillance for public health: Quo Vadis? Back cover Assessment and application of GeneXpert rapid testing for respiratory viruses in school wastewater† Applicability of β-lactamase entrapped agarose discs for removal of doripenem antibiotic: reusability and scale-up studies†
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1