PERCUTANEOUS APPROACH TO THE KIDNEY: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES OF VARIOUS TECHNIQUES - EXPERIENCE IN OSIJEK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CENTER.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Acta clinica Croatica Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.20471/acc.2023.62.s2.22
Mile Cvitković, Jakov Filipović, Josip Perković, Oliver Pavlović
{"title":"PERCUTANEOUS APPROACH TO THE KIDNEY: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES OF VARIOUS TECHNIQUES - EXPERIENCE IN OSIJEK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CENTER.","authors":"Mile Cvitković, Jakov Filipović, Josip Perković, Oliver Pavlović","doi":"10.20471/acc.2023.62.s2.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Today, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a standard procedure in the treatment of large kidney stones. Development of the procedure began in 1976 with publication of the first reports, while turning point came in 1985 when the first 250 cases were described. Subsequently, PCNL has become standard in the treatment of kidney stones instead of open surgery. Numerous modifications of the procedure have been developed with advancement of modern technology. Nevertheless, there is still the necessity for clearer understanding of differences and circumstances of choice among different techniques. There are significant differences in the instruments used for the procedure, so we distinguish standard PCNL (working channel of 24-30 Fr), mini PCNL (working channel of 11-18 Fr), ultra-mini PCNL (working channel <15 Fr), and micro PCNL (working channel <6 Fr). With the development of flexible ureteroscopy (FURS), a combined method is also being developed, i.e., Endoscopic Combined IntraRenal Surgery (ECIRS, PCNL + FURS). Furthermore, each procedure can be performed in prone or supine position. The aim of this paper is to point out the similarities and differences, the advantages and disadvantages of different techniques, with an additional aim to present our experience and current standard practice in kidney stone treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7072,"journal":{"name":"Acta clinica Croatica","volume":"62 Suppl2","pages":"148-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11221243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta clinica Croatica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2023.62.s2.22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a standard procedure in the treatment of large kidney stones. Development of the procedure began in 1976 with publication of the first reports, while turning point came in 1985 when the first 250 cases were described. Subsequently, PCNL has become standard in the treatment of kidney stones instead of open surgery. Numerous modifications of the procedure have been developed with advancement of modern technology. Nevertheless, there is still the necessity for clearer understanding of differences and circumstances of choice among different techniques. There are significant differences in the instruments used for the procedure, so we distinguish standard PCNL (working channel of 24-30 Fr), mini PCNL (working channel of 11-18 Fr), ultra-mini PCNL (working channel <15 Fr), and micro PCNL (working channel <6 Fr). With the development of flexible ureteroscopy (FURS), a combined method is also being developed, i.e., Endoscopic Combined IntraRenal Surgery (ECIRS, PCNL + FURS). Furthermore, each procedure can be performed in prone or supine position. The aim of this paper is to point out the similarities and differences, the advantages and disadvantages of different techniques, with an additional aim to present our experience and current standard practice in kidney stone treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮肾脏路径:各种技术的异同--奥西耶克大学医院中心的经验。
如今,经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)已成为治疗大块肾结石的标准手术。该手术的发展始于 1976 年,当时发表了第一份报告,而转折点出现在 1985 年,当时描述了第一批 250 个病例。随后,PCNL 成为治疗肾结石的标准方法,取代了开腹手术。随着现代技术的发展,该手术也进行了许多改进。尽管如此,仍有必要更清楚地了解不同技术之间的差异和选择情况。该手术使用的器械有很大不同,因此我们将其分为标准 PCNL(工作通道为 24-30 Fr)、迷你 PCNL(工作通道为 11-18 Fr)、超迷你 PCNL(工作通道为 24-30 Fr)和超迷你 PCNL(工作通道为 11-18 Fr)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta clinica Croatica
Acta clinica Croatica 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Clinica Croatica is a peer reviewed general medical journal that publishes original articles that advance and improve medical science and practice and that serve the purpose of transfer of original and valuable information to journal readers. Acta Clinica Croatica is published in English four times a year.
期刊最新文献
TRENDS IN OVERWEIGHT AND OBESITY AMONG SERBIAN ADULT POPULATION 2000-2013. TUBERCULOUS SPONDYLODISCITIS IN A RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENT - A CASE REPORT. UNCEMENTED VERSUS HYBRID TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: REVISION RATE, REVISION RISK FACTORS, AND REVISION CAUSE. URINARY NEPHRIN AS AN EARLY BIOMARKER OF HYPERTENSIVE NEPHROPATHY. ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE AND GAMMA-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE: INTRIGUING CLINICAL BIOMARKERS IN DISCRIMINATION OF HEPATIC LESION BETWEEN HEPATITIS C INFECTED PATIENTS AND HEALTHY CONTROLS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1