Prepacked Take-Home Analgesia in Outpatient Hand Surgery Reduces Opioid Dispensation.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.55095/achot2024/018
E Lundqvist, S Mousa, S Wallén, I Hurtig, D Reiser
{"title":"Prepacked Take-Home Analgesia in Outpatient Hand Surgery Reduces Opioid Dispensation.","authors":"E Lundqvist, S Mousa, S Wallén, I Hurtig, D Reiser","doi":"10.55095/achot2024/018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adequate postoperative pain treatment is important for quality of life, patient satisfaction, rehabilitation, function, and total opioid consumption, and might lower both the risk of chronic postoperative pain and the costs for society. Prolonged opioid consumption is a well-known risk factor for addiction. Previous studies in upper extremity surgery have shown that total opioid consumption is a third of the amount prescribed, which can be explained by package size. The aim of this study was to examine whether implementation of prepacked takehome analgesia bags reduced the quantity of prescribed and dispensed opioids.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We introduced prepacked take-home analgesia bags for postoperative pain treatment in outpatient surgery. The bags came in two sizes, each containing paracetamol, etoricoxib, and oxycodone. The first 147 patients who received the prepacked analgesia bags were included in the study, and received a questionnaire one month after surgery covering self-assessed pain (visual analog scale of 0-10) and satisfaction (0-5), as well as opioid consumption. Prescription data after introducing the analgesia bags were compared with data before the bags were introduced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 147 patients included in the study, 58 responded. Compared to standard prescription (small bag group: 14 oxycodone immediate release capsules (5 mg), large bag group: additional 28 oxycodone extended release tablets (5 mg), based on the smallest available package), the patients in the small analgesia bag group received 50% less oxycodone and 67% less for the large bag group. Patients with small bags consumed a median of 0.0 mg oxycodone and those with large bags consumed a median of 25.0 mg oxycodone. The median satisfaction was 5.0 (range: 2-5) and the median pain score was acceptable at the first postoperative day. Prescription data showed a significant reduction of 60.0% in the total amount of prescribed opioids after the introduction of prepacked analgesia bags.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The introduction of prepacked analgesia bags dramatically reduced the quantity of opioids prescribed after outpatient hand surgery. Patient satisfaction was high and the postoperative pain level was acceptable.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>analgesia, hand surgery, opioids, outpatint surgery, wrist surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2024/018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adequate postoperative pain treatment is important for quality of life, patient satisfaction, rehabilitation, function, and total opioid consumption, and might lower both the risk of chronic postoperative pain and the costs for society. Prolonged opioid consumption is a well-known risk factor for addiction. Previous studies in upper extremity surgery have shown that total opioid consumption is a third of the amount prescribed, which can be explained by package size. The aim of this study was to examine whether implementation of prepacked takehome analgesia bags reduced the quantity of prescribed and dispensed opioids.

Material and methods: We introduced prepacked take-home analgesia bags for postoperative pain treatment in outpatient surgery. The bags came in two sizes, each containing paracetamol, etoricoxib, and oxycodone. The first 147 patients who received the prepacked analgesia bags were included in the study, and received a questionnaire one month after surgery covering self-assessed pain (visual analog scale of 0-10) and satisfaction (0-5), as well as opioid consumption. Prescription data after introducing the analgesia bags were compared with data before the bags were introduced.

Results: Of the 147 patients included in the study, 58 responded. Compared to standard prescription (small bag group: 14 oxycodone immediate release capsules (5 mg), large bag group: additional 28 oxycodone extended release tablets (5 mg), based on the smallest available package), the patients in the small analgesia bag group received 50% less oxycodone and 67% less for the large bag group. Patients with small bags consumed a median of 0.0 mg oxycodone and those with large bags consumed a median of 25.0 mg oxycodone. The median satisfaction was 5.0 (range: 2-5) and the median pain score was acceptable at the first postoperative day. Prescription data showed a significant reduction of 60.0% in the total amount of prescribed opioids after the introduction of prepacked analgesia bags.

Conclusions: The introduction of prepacked analgesia bags dramatically reduced the quantity of opioids prescribed after outpatient hand surgery. Patient satisfaction was high and the postoperative pain level was acceptable.

Key words: analgesia, hand surgery, opioids, outpatint surgery, wrist surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊手外科手术中的预包装带回家镇痛可减少阿片类药物的用量。
背景:充分的术后疼痛治疗对生活质量、患者满意度、康复、功能和阿片类药物的总消耗量都很重要,并可降低术后慢性疼痛的风险和社会成本。长期服用阿片类药物是众所周知的成瘾风险因素。以往对上肢手术的研究表明,阿片类药物的总消耗量是处方量的三分之一,这可以用包装大小来解释。本研究旨在探讨预包装带回家镇痛袋的使用是否减少了阿片类药物的处方量和配药量:我们在门诊手术中引入了用于术后疼痛治疗的预包装居家镇痛袋。镇痛袋有两种规格,分别装有扑热息痛、依托考昔和羟考酮。首批 147 名接受了预包装镇痛袋的患者被纳入研究范围,并在术后一个月收到了一份调查问卷,内容包括疼痛自评(视觉模拟量表 0-10)、满意度(0-5)以及阿片类药物的消耗量。将使用镇痛袋后的处方数据与使用镇痛袋前的数据进行了比较:结果:在参与研究的 147 名患者中,有 58 人做出了回应。与标准处方(小药袋组:14 个羟考酮速释胶囊;小药袋组:14 个羟考酮速释胶囊;小药袋组:14 个羟考酮速释胶囊;小药袋组:14 个羟考酮速释胶囊与标准处方(小袋组:14 粒羟考酮速释胶囊(5 毫克),大袋组:额外 28 粒羟考酮缓释片(5 毫克),以现有最小包装为准)相比,小镇痛袋组患者服用的羟考酮减少了 50%,大袋组减少了 67%。使用小镇痛袋的患者消耗的羟考酮中位数为 0.0 毫克,使用大镇痛袋的患者消耗的羟考酮中位数为 25.0 毫克。术后第一天的满意度中位数为 5.0(范围:2-5),疼痛评分中位数为可接受。处方数据显示,采用预包装镇痛袋后,阿片类药物的处方总量大幅减少了 60.0%:结论:采用预包装镇痛袋后,门诊手外科手术后的阿片类药物处方量大幅减少。患者满意度高,术后疼痛程度可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
期刊最新文献
Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Image Reformation for Comparison of Foraminal Cross-Sectional Dimension in Patients Who Have Undergone Laminoplasty and Laminectomy with Fusion [Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech., 2024;91:103-108] [Arthroscopic Subtalar Distraction Arthrodesis in Post-Traumatic Indications]. [Sagittal Profi le of the Spine in Patients after Lumbar Stabilisation Surgeries]. [Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the AMIS Method: Surgical Technique, Suitability of This Method for Obese Patients, Evaluation of the Study Population]. Management of Length Unstable Femur Fractures in Children by Flexible Intramedullary Nails: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1