Argentine and World Health Organization head circumference standards: A comparison study.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PEDIATRICS Archivos argentinos de pediatria Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-11 DOI:10.5546/aap.2023-10270.eng
Mariana Del Pino, Sofía Chiaramonte, Alicia B Orden
{"title":"Argentine and World Health Organization head circumference standards: A comparison study.","authors":"Mariana Del Pino, Sofía Chiaramonte, Alicia B Orden","doi":"10.5546/aap.2023-10270.eng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction. Several studies have shown population differences in head circumference (HC) that question the universal validity of the World Health Organization (WHO) standard to assess head growth. Objectives. To compare the Argentine reference charts for HC from 0 to 5 years of age with the WHO standards. Population and methods. The 3rd and 97th percentiles for HC based on the Argentine reference charts were compared with the corresponding WHO standard and the percentage of children classified as having microcephaly (HC < 3rd percentile of the WHO) and macrocephaly (HC > 97th percentile of the WHO) at specific ages between 0 and 5 years were estimated. Results. The comparison of the Argentine reference charts with the WHO standards shows that, in both males and females, at the 3rd percentile, the Argentine reference charts are below the WHO standards from 1 to 6 months of age, similar from 9 to 18 months of age, and then above until 60 months old. In relation to the 97th percentile, the Argentine reference charts are above the WHO standards from birth to 60 months in both boys and girls. Conclusions. The head size of Argentine children is different from that established by the WHO standards. The adoption of the WHO standards for our population increases the percentage of macrocephaly diagnosis at all ages.</p>","PeriodicalId":8338,"journal":{"name":"Archivos argentinos de pediatria","volume":" ","pages":"e202310270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos argentinos de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5546/aap.2023-10270.eng","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Several studies have shown population differences in head circumference (HC) that question the universal validity of the World Health Organization (WHO) standard to assess head growth. Objectives. To compare the Argentine reference charts for HC from 0 to 5 years of age with the WHO standards. Population and methods. The 3rd and 97th percentiles for HC based on the Argentine reference charts were compared with the corresponding WHO standard and the percentage of children classified as having microcephaly (HC < 3rd percentile of the WHO) and macrocephaly (HC > 97th percentile of the WHO) at specific ages between 0 and 5 years were estimated. Results. The comparison of the Argentine reference charts with the WHO standards shows that, in both males and females, at the 3rd percentile, the Argentine reference charts are below the WHO standards from 1 to 6 months of age, similar from 9 to 18 months of age, and then above until 60 months old. In relation to the 97th percentile, the Argentine reference charts are above the WHO standards from birth to 60 months in both boys and girls. Conclusions. The head size of Argentine children is different from that established by the WHO standards. The adoption of the WHO standards for our population increases the percentage of macrocephaly diagnosis at all ages.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿根廷和世界卫生组织的头围标准:比较研究。
导言。多项研究表明,不同人群的头围(HC)存在差异,这对世界卫生组织(WHO)评估头部发育标准的普遍有效性提出了质疑。研究目的比较阿根廷 0 至 5 岁儿童头围参考图与世界卫生组织标准。人群和方法。将根据阿根廷参考图表得出的HC第3个百分位数和第97个百分位数与相应的世界卫生组织标准进行比较,并估算0至5岁特定年龄段被归类为小头畸形(HC<世界卫生组织第3个百分位数)和大头畸形(HC>世界卫生组织第97个百分位数)的儿童比例。结果。阿根廷参考图与世卫组织标准的比较显示,无论男女,阿根廷参考图的第 3 百分位数在 1 到 6 个月大时均低于世卫组织标准,在 9 到 18 个月大时与世卫组织标准相似,在 60 个月大之前高于世卫组织标准。至于第 97 个百分位数,阿根廷的参考图表在男婴和女婴出生至 60 个月期间均高于世界卫生组织的标准。结论。阿根廷儿童的头围与世界卫生组织的标准不同。在我国人口中采用世界卫生组织的标准会增加各年龄段巨头畸形的诊断率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
286
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archivos Argentinos de Pediatría is the official publication of the Sociedad Argentina de Pediatría (SAP) and has been published without interruption since 1930. Its publication is bimonthly. Archivos Argentinos de Pediatría publishes articles related to perinatal, child and adolescent health and other relevant disciplines for the medical profession.
期刊最新文献
Fiber in enteral nutrition: why and what for? [Recommendations on the use of palivizumab: update 2023]. Liver transplantation for primary liver tumors in pediatrics. A case series. The diagnosis of short lingual frenulum and how to promote breastfeeding. The lingual frenulum, ankyloglossia, and breastfeeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1