The arsenic eaters of Styria, the toxicophagi.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY Clinical Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1080/15563650.2024.2371514
Anthony D Dayan, Ernst Hesse, Joshua Dayan
{"title":"The arsenic eaters of Styria, the toxicophagi.","authors":"Anthony D Dayan, Ernst Hesse, Joshua Dayan","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2371514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>From at least the fifteenth to late nineteenth centuries, peasants in the Austrian province of Styria ate up to several hundred milligrams of arsenic trioxide or sulfide daily or weekly for periods up to a number of years. Taking these doses of arsenic was believed to increase muscular power and enhance the beauty and sexual attractiveness of peasant girls. There do not appear to be contemporaneous records of the known consequences of chronic arsenic exposure. The historical records of arsenic eating there are reviewed and appear to be valid. The benefits are subjective judgements by arsenic eaters. The lack of objective reports of the anticipated external and internal clinical and pathological effects of arsenic poisoning depends on a smaller number of clinical accounts and autopsy reports and the general medical literature of those times, so it is weaker, but it is consistent.</p><p><strong>Can the claimed benefits of arsenic eating and the apparent absence of harmful toxic effects be true?: </strong>Why the arsenic eaters did not show the well-known consequences of prolonged exposure to high doses of arsenic is not known. Possible explanations include increases in detoxifying metabolism in the consumers due to induced genomic changes and selection in people and in the gut microbiome, as shown in other populations. Whether these effects would suffice to protect people against their high doses of arsenic has not been explored.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the nature and mechanisms of arsenic toxicity have been extensively described, much still remains to be discovered.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"468-471"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2024.2371514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: From at least the fifteenth to late nineteenth centuries, peasants in the Austrian province of Styria ate up to several hundred milligrams of arsenic trioxide or sulfide daily or weekly for periods up to a number of years. Taking these doses of arsenic was believed to increase muscular power and enhance the beauty and sexual attractiveness of peasant girls. There do not appear to be contemporaneous records of the known consequences of chronic arsenic exposure. The historical records of arsenic eating there are reviewed and appear to be valid. The benefits are subjective judgements by arsenic eaters. The lack of objective reports of the anticipated external and internal clinical and pathological effects of arsenic poisoning depends on a smaller number of clinical accounts and autopsy reports and the general medical literature of those times, so it is weaker, but it is consistent.

Can the claimed benefits of arsenic eating and the apparent absence of harmful toxic effects be true?: Why the arsenic eaters did not show the well-known consequences of prolonged exposure to high doses of arsenic is not known. Possible explanations include increases in detoxifying metabolism in the consumers due to induced genomic changes and selection in people and in the gut microbiome, as shown in other populations. Whether these effects would suffice to protect people against their high doses of arsenic has not been explored.

Conclusion: Although the nature and mechanisms of arsenic toxicity have been extensively described, much still remains to be discovered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
施蒂里亚州的食砷者--嗜毒者。
导言:至少从十五世纪到十九世纪末,奥地利施蒂里亚州的农民每天或每周都要摄入多达数百毫克的三氧化二砷或硫化物,持续时间长达数年。服用这些剂量的砒霜被认为可以增强肌肉力量,提高农家女孩的美貌和性吸引力。关于慢性砷暴露的已知后果,似乎没有同时期的记录。经查阅,有关吃砒霜的历史记录似乎是有效的。好处是吃砒霜者的主观判断。缺乏关于砷中毒预期的内外临床和病理影响的客观报告,这取决于数量较少的临床描述和尸检报告以及当时的一般医学文献,因此其说服力较弱,但具有一致性。可能的解释包括,如在其他人群中显示的那样,由于诱导基因组变化以及人和肠道微生物组的选择,食用者的解毒代谢增加。至于这些效应是否足以保护人们免受高剂量砷的危害,尚未进行探讨:尽管砷毒性的性质和机制已被广泛描述,但仍有许多问题有待发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Toxicology
Clinical Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: clinical Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed scientific research and clinical advances in clinical toxicology. The journal reflects the professional concerns and best scientific judgment of its sponsors, the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the American Association of Poison Control Centers and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology and, as such, is the leading international journal in the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Correction. Ethanol for the management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome: a systematic review. A 10-year retrospective review of exposures to volatile nitrites reported to the Victorian Poisons Information Centre. Response to West et al. "Identifying and quantifying exposures involving counterfeit opioid analgesic products". Augmenting the sensitivity for hepatotoxicity prediction in acute paracetamol overdose: combining psi (ψ) parameter and paracetamol concentration aminotransferase activity multiplication product.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1