Image quality of lung perfusion with photon-counting-detector CT: comparison with dual-source, dual-energy CT.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-10888-0
Martine Remy-Jardin, Lucas Guiffault, Idir Oufriche, Alain Duhamel, Thomas Flohr, Bernhard Schmidt, Jacques Remy
{"title":"Image quality of lung perfusion with photon-counting-detector CT: comparison with dual-source, dual-energy CT.","authors":"Martine Remy-Jardin, Lucas Guiffault, Idir Oufriche, Alain Duhamel, Thomas Flohr, Bernhard Schmidt, Jacques Remy","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10888-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the quality of lung perfusion imaging obtained with photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) in comparison with dual-source, dual-energy CT (DECT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-one consecutive patients scanned with PCD-CT were compared to a paired population scanned with dual-energy on a 3rd-generation DS-CT scanner using (a) for DS-CT (Group 1): collimation: 64 × 0.6 × 2 mm; pitch: 0.55; (b) for PCD-CT (Group 2): collimation: 144 × 0.4 mm; pitch: 1.5; single-source acquisition. The injection protocol was similar in both groups with the reconstruction of perfusion images by subtraction of high- and low-energy virtual monoenergetic images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to Group 1, Group 2 examinations showed: (a) a shorter duration of data acquisition (0.93 ± 0.1 s vs 3.98 ± 0.35 s; p < 0.0001); (b) a significantly lower dose-length-product (172.6 ± 55.14 vs 339.4 ± 75.64 mGy·cm; p < 0.0001); and (c) a higher level of objective noise (p < 0.0001) on mediastinal images. On perfusion images: (a) the mean level of attenuation did not differ (p = 0.05) with less subjective image noise in Group 2 (p = 0.049); (b) the distribution of scores of fissure visualization differed between the 2 groups (p < 0.0001) with a higher proportion of fissures sharply delineated in Group 2 (n = 60; 84.5% vs n = 26; 26.6%); (c) the rating of cardiac motion artifacts differed between the 2 groups (p < 0.0001) with a predominance of examinations rated with mild artifacts in Group 2 (n = 69; 97.2%) while the most Group 1 examinations showed moderate artifacts (n = 52; 73.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCD-CT acquisitions provided similar morphologic image quality and superior perfusion imaging at lower radiation doses.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>The improvement in the overall quality of perfusion images at lower radiation doses opens the door for wider applications of lung perfusion imaging in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>The speed of data acquisition with PCD-CT accounts for mild motion artifacts. Sharply delineated fissures are depicted on PCD-CT perfusion images. High-quality perfusion imaging was obtained with a 52% dose reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"7831-7844"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10888-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the quality of lung perfusion imaging obtained with photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) in comparison with dual-source, dual-energy CT (DECT).

Methods: Seventy-one consecutive patients scanned with PCD-CT were compared to a paired population scanned with dual-energy on a 3rd-generation DS-CT scanner using (a) for DS-CT (Group 1): collimation: 64 × 0.6 × 2 mm; pitch: 0.55; (b) for PCD-CT (Group 2): collimation: 144 × 0.4 mm; pitch: 1.5; single-source acquisition. The injection protocol was similar in both groups with the reconstruction of perfusion images by subtraction of high- and low-energy virtual monoenergetic images.

Results: Compared to Group 1, Group 2 examinations showed: (a) a shorter duration of data acquisition (0.93 ± 0.1 s vs 3.98 ± 0.35 s; p < 0.0001); (b) a significantly lower dose-length-product (172.6 ± 55.14 vs 339.4 ± 75.64 mGy·cm; p < 0.0001); and (c) a higher level of objective noise (p < 0.0001) on mediastinal images. On perfusion images: (a) the mean level of attenuation did not differ (p = 0.05) with less subjective image noise in Group 2 (p = 0.049); (b) the distribution of scores of fissure visualization differed between the 2 groups (p < 0.0001) with a higher proportion of fissures sharply delineated in Group 2 (n = 60; 84.5% vs n = 26; 26.6%); (c) the rating of cardiac motion artifacts differed between the 2 groups (p < 0.0001) with a predominance of examinations rated with mild artifacts in Group 2 (n = 69; 97.2%) while the most Group 1 examinations showed moderate artifacts (n = 52; 73.2%).

Conclusion: PCD-CT acquisitions provided similar morphologic image quality and superior perfusion imaging at lower radiation doses.

Clinical relevance statement: The improvement in the overall quality of perfusion images at lower radiation doses opens the door for wider applications of lung perfusion imaging in clinical practice.

Key points: The speed of data acquisition with PCD-CT accounts for mild motion artifacts. Sharply delineated fissures are depicted on PCD-CT perfusion images. High-quality perfusion imaging was obtained with a 52% dose reduction.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光子计数探测器 CT 的肺灌注图像质量:与双源双能 CT 的比较。
目的:评估光子计数探测器 CT(PCD-CT)与双源双能 CT(DECT)相比获得的肺灌注成像质量:在第三代 DS-CT 扫描仪上对 71 名连续使用 PCD-CT 扫描的患者和使用双能 CT 扫描的配对人群进行了比较:64 × 0.6 × 2 毫米;间距:0.55;(b) PCD-CT(第 2 组):准直:144 × 0.4 毫米;间距:1.5;单源采集。两组的注射方案相似,通过减去高能和低能虚拟单能图像重建灌注图像:结果:与第一组相比,第二组的检查结果表明(结果:与第 1 组相比,第 2 组的检查结果显示:(a) 数据采集时间更短(0.93±0.1 秒 vs 3.98±0.35 秒;PPCD-CT采集能以较低的辐射剂量提供相似的形态学图像质量和更好的灌注成像:临床相关性声明:在辐射剂量较低的情况下,灌注成像的整体质量得到改善,这为肺灌注成像在临床实践中的更广泛应用打开了大门:要点:PCD-CT的数据采集速度快,因此会产生轻微的运动伪影。PCD-CT灌注成像可清晰描绘裂隙。在剂量减少 52% 的情况下获得了高质量的灌注成像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Comparison between CT volumetry and extracellular volume fraction using liver dynamic CT for the predictive ability of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Correction: Development and evaluation of two open-source nnU-Net models for automatic segmentation of lung tumors on PET and CT images with and without respiratory motion compensation. Correction: Machine learning detects symptomatic patients with carotid plaques based on 6-type calcium configuration classification on CT angiography. Natural language processing pipeline to extract prostate cancer-related information from clinical notes. ESR Essentials: characterisation and staging of adnexal masses with MRI and CT-practice recommendations by ESUR.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1