Prognostic value of lung immune prognostic index in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pathology & Oncology Research Pub Date : 2024-06-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/pore.2024.1611773
Yi Wang, Yu Lei, Delai Zheng, Yanhui Yang, Lei Luo, Ji Li, Xiaoyang Xie
{"title":"Prognostic value of lung immune prognostic index in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Yi Wang, Yu Lei, Delai Zheng, Yanhui Yang, Lei Luo, Ji Li, Xiaoyang Xie","doi":"10.3389/pore.2024.1611773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Until now, it has been difficult to accurately predict the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A novel indicator, the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI), has shown relatively high prognostic value in patients with solid cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to further identify the association between LIPI and the survival of patients with NSCLC who receive immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Several electronic databases were searched for available publications up to April 23, 2023. Immunotherapy outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analysis based on the study design and comparison of the LIPI was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this meta-analysis, 21 studies with 9,010 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that elevated LIPI was significantly associated with poor OS (HR = 2.50, 95% CI:2.09-2.99, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 1.77, 95% CI:1.64-1.91, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Subgroup analyses stratified by study design (retrospective vs. prospective) and comparison of LIPI (1 vs. 0, 2 vs. 0, 1-2 vs. 0, 2 vs. 1 vs. 0, 2 vs. 0-1 and 2 vs. 1) showed similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LIPI could serve as a novel and reliable prognostic factor in NSCLC treated with ICIs, and elevated LIPI predicts worse prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19981,"journal":{"name":"Pathology & Oncology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11222319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology & Oncology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2024.1611773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Until now, it has been difficult to accurately predict the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A novel indicator, the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI), has shown relatively high prognostic value in patients with solid cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to further identify the association between LIPI and the survival of patients with NSCLC who receive immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Methods: Several electronic databases were searched for available publications up to April 23, 2023. Immunotherapy outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analysis based on the study design and comparison of the LIPI was conducted.

Results: In this meta-analysis, 21 studies with 9,010 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that elevated LIPI was significantly associated with poor OS (HR = 2.50, 95% CI:2.09-2.99, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 1.77, 95% CI:1.64-1.91, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses stratified by study design (retrospective vs. prospective) and comparison of LIPI (1 vs. 0, 2 vs. 0, 1-2 vs. 0, 2 vs. 1 vs. 0, 2 vs. 0-1 and 2 vs. 1) showed similar results.

Conclusion: LIPI could serve as a novel and reliable prognostic factor in NSCLC treated with ICIs, and elevated LIPI predicts worse prognosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者肺部免疫预后指数的预后价值:一项荟萃分析。
背景和目的:迄今为止,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的免疫疗法疗效一直难以准确预测。肺免疫预后指数(LIPI)这一新型指标在实体瘤患者中显示出相对较高的预后价值。因此,本研究旨在进一步确定LIPI与接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗的NSCLC患者生存期之间的关系:方法:在多个电子数据库中检索了截至2023年4月23日的文献。免疫治疗结果包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、危险比(HRs)及95%置信区间(CIs)。根据研究设计和LIPI的比较进行了分组分析:本次荟萃分析共纳入21项研究,9010名患者。汇总结果显示,LIPI升高与OS(HR=2.50,95% CI:2.09-2.99,p<0.001)和PFS(HR=1.77,95% CI:1.64-1.91,p<0.001)差显著相关。根据研究设计(回顾性与前瞻性)和LIPI的比较(1 vs. 0、2 vs. 0、1-2 vs. 0、2 vs. 1 vs. 0、2 vs. 0-1和2 vs. 1)进行的亚组分析显示了相似的结果:结论:LIPI可作为接受ICIs治疗的NSCLC患者的一个新的、可靠的预后因素,LIPI升高预示着预后较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
134
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pathology & Oncology Research (POR) is an interdisciplinary Journal at the interface of pathology and oncology including the preclinical and translational research, diagnostics and therapy. Furthermore, POR is an international forum for the rapid communication of reviews, original research, critical and topical reports with excellence and novelty. Published quarterly, POR is dedicated to keeping scientists informed of developments on the selected biomedical fields bridging the gap between basic research and clinical medicine. It is a special aim for POR to promote pathological and oncological publishing activity of colleagues in the Central and East European region. The journal will be of interest to pathologists, and a broad range of experimental and clinical oncologists, and related experts. POR is supported by an acknowledged international advisory board and the Arányi Fundation for modern pathology.
期刊最新文献
Molecular classification of endometrial cancer: preliminary experience from a single Portuguese academic center. Case report: A mesenchymal chondrosarcoma with alternative HEY1::NCOA2 fusions in the sella turcica. Intraoperative pyloric drainage is unnecessary during esophagectomies: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Molecular genetic investigation of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients in the Southern Transdanubian region: widening the mutation spectrum and searching for new pathogenic variants using next-generation methods. Corrigendum: Association between pathological characteristics and recurrence score by OncotypeDX in resected T1-3 and N0-1 breast cancer: a real-life experience of a North Hungarian regional center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1