Method comparison between hematopoietic progenitor cell and CD34+ cell counts in hematopoietic stem cell collection.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1111/trf.17937
Thibault Lavalleye, Pascale Saussoy, Catherine Lambert
{"title":"Method comparison between hematopoietic progenitor cell and CD34+ cell counts in hematopoietic stem cell collection.","authors":"Thibault Lavalleye, Pascale Saussoy, Catherine Lambert","doi":"10.1111/trf.17937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The reference method for hematopoietic stem cell enumeration is flow cytometric CD34+ cell analysis. We evaluated using the hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) count on the Sysmex hematology analyzer to safely replace some flow cytometric measurements performed in peripheral blood samples to guide apheresis timing.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We compared HPC and CD34+ cell counts in 133 preharvest peripheral blood samples and 124 apheresis products.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-apheresis HPC counts ≥24 × 10<sup>6</sup>/L in healthy donors and ≥36 × 10<sup>6</sup>/L in lymphoma patients predicted adequate mobilization with 100% specificity and positive predictive value, saving 79% and 63% of flow cytometry analyses, respectively. Due to a positive bias (mean bias 50.26; 95% CI 36.24-64.29), a higher threshold was needed in multiple myeloma patients (HPC <math><mrow><mo>≥</mo></mrow> </math> 132 × 10<sup>6</sup>/L), saving only 24% of flow cytometry analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the HPC count is above the corresponding threshold, apheresis could be safely initiated without waiting for the flow cytometry result, thereby reducing time-to-decision. Lower HPC values, however, require confirmation by flow cytometry.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.17937","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The reference method for hematopoietic stem cell enumeration is flow cytometric CD34+ cell analysis. We evaluated using the hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) count on the Sysmex hematology analyzer to safely replace some flow cytometric measurements performed in peripheral blood samples to guide apheresis timing.

Study design and methods: We compared HPC and CD34+ cell counts in 133 preharvest peripheral blood samples and 124 apheresis products.

Results: Pre-apheresis HPC counts ≥24 × 106/L in healthy donors and ≥36 × 106/L in lymphoma patients predicted adequate mobilization with 100% specificity and positive predictive value, saving 79% and 63% of flow cytometry analyses, respectively. Due to a positive bias (mean bias 50.26; 95% CI 36.24-64.29), a higher threshold was needed in multiple myeloma patients (HPC 132 × 106/L), saving only 24% of flow cytometry analyses.

Conclusion: When the HPC count is above the corresponding threshold, apheresis could be safely initiated without waiting for the flow cytometry result, thereby reducing time-to-decision. Lower HPC values, however, require confirmation by flow cytometry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
造血干细胞采集中造血祖细胞和 CD34+ 细胞计数的方法比较。
背景:造血干细胞计数的参考方法是流式细胞CD34+细胞分析。我们评估了使用 Sysmex 血液分析仪上的造血祖细胞(HPC)计数是否能安全地取代外周血样本中的某些流式细胞术测量,以指导血液净化时机的选择:研究设计:我们比较了133份采血前外周血样本和124份血液净化产品中的HPC和CD34+细胞计数:结果:健康献血者采血前HPC计数≥24 × 106/L和淋巴瘤患者采血前HPC计数≥36 × 106/L可预测充分的动员,特异性和阳性预测值均为100%,分别节省了79%和63%的流式细胞术分析。由于阳性偏倚(平均偏倚50.26;95% CI 36.24-64.29),多发性骨髓瘤患者需要更高的阈值(HPC ≥ $\ge $ 132 × 106/L),这仅节省了24%的流式细胞术分析:结论:当HPC计数高于相应的阈值时,可以安全地启动无细胞疗法,而无需等待流式细胞术结果,从而缩短了做出决定的时间。然而,较低的 HPC 值则需要通过流式细胞术进行确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
期刊最新文献
Laboratory detection of donors implicated in transfusion-transmitted malaria. Splitting apheresis platelets as a contingency measure for inventory shortages. Longitudinal outcomes of chronically transfused adults with sickle cell disease and a history of childhood stroke. High-frequency whole blood donation and its impact on mortality: Evidence from a data linkage study in Australia. Risk of introducing Zika virus in the Canadian cord blood supply: A risk analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1