{"title":"[MRI manifestations of 40 cases with the hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma classification based on the morphology and size].","authors":"Q Lu, L L Chen, M S Zeng, M L Wang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20230910-00100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the MRI characteristics of the hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) classification according to morphology and size. <b>Methods:</b> The clinical, pathological, and MRI imaging data of 40 cases with HEHE confirmed pathologically from December 2009 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. A paired sample <i>t</i>-test was used for comparison between the two groups. <b>Results:</b> There were 40 cases (5 solitary, 24 multifocal, 9 local fusion, and 2 diffuse fusion) and 214 lesions (163 nodules, 31 masses, and 20 fusion foci). The most common features of lesions were subcapsular growth and capsular depression. The signal intensity of lesions ≤1cm was usually uniform with whole or ring enhancement. Nodules and mass-like lesions ≥1cm on a T1-weighted image had slightly reduced signal intensity or manifested as a halo sign. Target signs on a T2-weighted image were characterized by: target or centripetal enhancement; fusion-type lesions; irregular growth and hepatic capsular retraction, with ring or target-like enhancement in the early stage of fusion and patchy irregular enhancement in the late stage; blood vessels traversing or accompanied by malformed blood vessels; focal bleeding; an increasing proportion of extrahepatic metastases and abnormal liver function with the type of classified manifestation; primarily portal vein branches traversing; and reduced overall intralesional bleeding rate (17%). Lollipop signs were presented in 19 cases, with a high expression rate in mass-type lesions (42%). The fusion lesions were expressed, but the morphological manifestation was atypical. The diffusion-weighted imaging mostly showed high signal or target-like high signal. An average apparent diffusion coefficient of lesions was (1.56±0.36) ×10(-3)mm(2)/s, which was statistically significantly different compared with that of adjacent normal liver parenchyma (<i>t</i>=8.28, <i>P</i><0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> The MRI manifestations for the HEHE classification are closely related to the morphology and size of the lesions and have certain differences and characteristics that are helpful for the diagnosis of the disease when combined with clinical and laboratory examinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":24006,"journal":{"name":"中华肝脏病杂志","volume":"32 6","pages":"545-550"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肝脏病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20230910-00100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To explore the MRI characteristics of the hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) classification according to morphology and size. Methods: The clinical, pathological, and MRI imaging data of 40 cases with HEHE confirmed pathologically from December 2009 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. A paired sample t-test was used for comparison between the two groups. Results: There were 40 cases (5 solitary, 24 multifocal, 9 local fusion, and 2 diffuse fusion) and 214 lesions (163 nodules, 31 masses, and 20 fusion foci). The most common features of lesions were subcapsular growth and capsular depression. The signal intensity of lesions ≤1cm was usually uniform with whole or ring enhancement. Nodules and mass-like lesions ≥1cm on a T1-weighted image had slightly reduced signal intensity or manifested as a halo sign. Target signs on a T2-weighted image were characterized by: target or centripetal enhancement; fusion-type lesions; irregular growth and hepatic capsular retraction, with ring or target-like enhancement in the early stage of fusion and patchy irregular enhancement in the late stage; blood vessels traversing or accompanied by malformed blood vessels; focal bleeding; an increasing proportion of extrahepatic metastases and abnormal liver function with the type of classified manifestation; primarily portal vein branches traversing; and reduced overall intralesional bleeding rate (17%). Lollipop signs were presented in 19 cases, with a high expression rate in mass-type lesions (42%). The fusion lesions were expressed, but the morphological manifestation was atypical. The diffusion-weighted imaging mostly showed high signal or target-like high signal. An average apparent diffusion coefficient of lesions was (1.56±0.36) ×10(-3)mm(2)/s, which was statistically significantly different compared with that of adjacent normal liver parenchyma (t=8.28, P<0.001). Conclusion: The MRI manifestations for the HEHE classification are closely related to the morphology and size of the lesions and have certain differences and characteristics that are helpful for the diagnosis of the disease when combined with clinical and laboratory examinations.