A novel technique for NO.253 lymph node dissection and left colic artery preservation to avoid potential postoperative internal hernia in laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY BMC Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02492-2
Wenjun Luo, Fugen Li, Chuan Qian, Tingting Lu, Yanling Xiao, Zhengwen Xu, Yingdong Jia
{"title":"A novel technique for NO.253 lymph node dissection and left colic artery preservation to avoid potential postoperative internal hernia in laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer.","authors":"Wenjun Luo, Fugen Li, Chuan Qian, Tingting Lu, Yanling Xiao, Zhengwen Xu, Yingdong Jia","doi":"10.1186/s12893-024-02492-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The preservation of the left colic artery (LCA) has emerged as a preferred approach in laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer. However, preserving the LCA while simultaneously dissecting the NO.253 lymph node can create a mesenteric defect between the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), the LCA, and the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV). This defect could act as a potential \"hernia ring,\" increasing the risk of developing an internal hernia after surgery. The objective of this study was to introduce a novel technique designed to mitigate the risk of internal hernia by filling mesenteric defects with autologous tissue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This new technique was performed on eighteen patients with rectal cancer between January 2022 and June 2022. First of all, dissected the lymphatic fatty tissue on the main trunk of IMA from its origin until the LCA and sigmoid artery (SA) or superior rectal artery (SRA) were exposed and then NO.253 lymph node was dissected between the IMA, LCA and IMV. Next, the SRA or SRA and IMV were sequentially ligated and cut off at an appropriate location away from the \"hernia ring\" to preserve the connective tissue between the \"hernia ring\" and retroperitoneum. Finally, after mobilization of distal sigmoid, on the lateral side of IMV, the descending colon was mobilized cephalad. Patients'preoperative baseline characteristics and intraoperative, postoperative complications were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients' potential \"hernia rings\" were closed successfully with our new technique. The median operative time was 195 min, and the median intraoperative blood loss was 55 ml (interquartile range 30-90). The total harvested lymph nodes was 13.0(range12-19). The median times to first flatus and liquid diet intake were both 3.0 days. The median number of postoperative hospital days was 8.0 days. One patient had an injury to marginal arterial arch, and after mobolization of splenic region, tension-free anastomosis was achieved. No other severe postoperative complications such as abdominal infection, anastomotic leakage, or bleeding were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This technique is both safe and effective for filling the mesenteric defect, potentially reducing the risk of internal hernia following laparoscopic NO.253 lymph node dissection and preservation of the left colic artery in rectal cancer surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11223325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02492-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The preservation of the left colic artery (LCA) has emerged as a preferred approach in laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer. However, preserving the LCA while simultaneously dissecting the NO.253 lymph node can create a mesenteric defect between the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), the LCA, and the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV). This defect could act as a potential "hernia ring," increasing the risk of developing an internal hernia after surgery. The objective of this study was to introduce a novel technique designed to mitigate the risk of internal hernia by filling mesenteric defects with autologous tissue.

Methods: This new technique was performed on eighteen patients with rectal cancer between January 2022 and June 2022. First of all, dissected the lymphatic fatty tissue on the main trunk of IMA from its origin until the LCA and sigmoid artery (SA) or superior rectal artery (SRA) were exposed and then NO.253 lymph node was dissected between the IMA, LCA and IMV. Next, the SRA or SRA and IMV were sequentially ligated and cut off at an appropriate location away from the "hernia ring" to preserve the connective tissue between the "hernia ring" and retroperitoneum. Finally, after mobilization of distal sigmoid, on the lateral side of IMV, the descending colon was mobilized cephalad. Patients'preoperative baseline characteristics and intraoperative, postoperative complications were examined.

Results: All patients' potential "hernia rings" were closed successfully with our new technique. The median operative time was 195 min, and the median intraoperative blood loss was 55 ml (interquartile range 30-90). The total harvested lymph nodes was 13.0(range12-19). The median times to first flatus and liquid diet intake were both 3.0 days. The median number of postoperative hospital days was 8.0 days. One patient had an injury to marginal arterial arch, and after mobolization of splenic region, tension-free anastomosis was achieved. No other severe postoperative complications such as abdominal infection, anastomotic leakage, or bleeding were observed.

Conclusions: This technique is both safe and effective for filling the mesenteric defect, potentially reducing the risk of internal hernia following laparoscopic NO.253 lymph node dissection and preservation of the left colic artery in rectal cancer surgeries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中保留 NO.253 淋巴结清扫和左结肠动脉以避免术后潜在内疝的新技术。
背景:保留左结肠动脉(LCA)已成为腹腔镜直肠癌根治性切除术的首选方法。然而,在保留 LCA 的同时切除 NO.253 淋巴结会在肠系膜下动脉 (IMA)、LCA 和肠系膜下静脉 (IMV) 之间造成肠系膜缺损。该缺损可能成为潜在的 "疝环",增加术后发生内疝的风险。本研究旨在介绍一种新技术,通过用自体组织填充肠系膜缺损来降低内疝的风险:方法:2022 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月期间,对 18 名直肠癌患者实施了这项新技术。首先,将 IMA 主干上的淋巴脂肪组织从其起源处剥离,直至暴露出 LCA 和乙状动脉(SA)或直肠上动脉(SRA),然后在 IMA、LCA 和 IMV 之间剥离 NO.253 淋巴结。然后,在远离 "疝环 "的适当位置依次结扎并切断 SRA 或 SRA 和 IMV,以保留 "疝环 "和腹膜后之间的结缔组织。最后,在移除远端乙状结肠后,在IMV的外侧向头侧移除降结肠。对患者的术前基线特征、术中和术后并发症进行了检查:结果:所有患者的潜在 "疝环 "都通过我们的新技术成功闭合。手术时间中位数为 195 分钟,术中失血量中位数为 55 毫升(四分位数间距为 30-90)。收获的淋巴结总数为 13.0 个(12-19 个不等)。首次排便和进食流质食物的中位时间均为 3.0 天。术后住院天数的中位数为 8.0 天。一名患者的边缘动脉弓受伤,在对脾脏区域进行移动后,实现了无张力吻合。术后未发现其他严重并发症,如腹腔感染、吻合口漏或出血:这项技术对填充肠系膜缺损既安全又有效,有可能降低直肠癌手术中腹腔镜NO.253淋巴结清扫术和保留左结肠动脉术后发生内疝的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Real-world study on the application of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in video-assisted thoracoscopic day surgery for pulmonary nodule resection. The seven-day cumulative post-esophagectomy inflammatory response predicts cancer recurrence. Seprafilm® and adhesive small bowel obstruction in colorectal/abdominal surgery: an updated systematic review. The safety and efficacy of stapler method for transection of the pancreatic parenchyma during pancreatoduodenectomy (STRAP-PD trial): study protocol for a randomized control trial. Challenges and opportunities for Mohs surgery implementation in African healthcare systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1