The elephant in the room: a study on the dialogue about sexuality during Assisted Reproductive Technology visits.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1080/0167482X.2024.2372565
Michele Montecalvo, Elena Vegni, Raffaella Balestrieri, Daniela Leone, Lidia Borghi
{"title":"The elephant in the room: a study on the dialogue about sexuality during Assisted Reproductive Technology visits.","authors":"Michele Montecalvo, Elena Vegni, Raffaella Balestrieri, Daniela Leone, Lidia Borghi","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2024.2372565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite ongoing medical advancements in infertility treatment, the significant impact of sexuality on this journey often goes unaddressed. The present research aims to examine sexual conversations during ART visits, including who initiate the conversation and their content.This quali-quantitative study delves into analyzed video-recorded ART visits to explore how \"sex\" conversations are broached during healthcare interactions. Our findings reveal a strikingly low proportion of utterances related to sexuality, accounting for only 1.3% of the total 14,372 utterances analyzed. Sex utterances were mainly introduced by physicians (72%), while regarding those introduced by the couple, 64% were reported by men. From the qualitative analysis on the utterances emerged three distinct levels of communication about sex: explicit, almost explicit, and implicit. While physicians and males exhibit an almost balanced distribution across the 3 levels, female patients primarily respond to explicit and almost explicit communication initiated by physicians. The low percentage of sexual utterances underscores the rarity of these conversations during ART interactions, despite the clinical field where sexual health should deserve a crucial attention. Opening the door to conversations about sexuality could help to create a safe and supportive space for patients to talk about sex, with a potential impact on well-being and quality of care during the ART process.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"45 1","pages":"2372565"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2024.2372565","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite ongoing medical advancements in infertility treatment, the significant impact of sexuality on this journey often goes unaddressed. The present research aims to examine sexual conversations during ART visits, including who initiate the conversation and their content.This quali-quantitative study delves into analyzed video-recorded ART visits to explore how "sex" conversations are broached during healthcare interactions. Our findings reveal a strikingly low proportion of utterances related to sexuality, accounting for only 1.3% of the total 14,372 utterances analyzed. Sex utterances were mainly introduced by physicians (72%), while regarding those introduced by the couple, 64% were reported by men. From the qualitative analysis on the utterances emerged three distinct levels of communication about sex: explicit, almost explicit, and implicit. While physicians and males exhibit an almost balanced distribution across the 3 levels, female patients primarily respond to explicit and almost explicit communication initiated by physicians. The low percentage of sexual utterances underscores the rarity of these conversations during ART interactions, despite the clinical field where sexual health should deserve a crucial attention. Opening the door to conversations about sexuality could help to create a safe and supportive space for patients to talk about sex, with a potential impact on well-being and quality of care during the ART process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
房间里的大象:关于辅助生殖技术就诊期间性问题对话的研究。
尽管不孕不育治疗的医疗技术不断进步,但性生活对这一过程的重要影响却往往没有得到关注。本研究旨在探讨抗逆转录病毒疗法就诊过程中的性对话,包括由谁发起的对话及其内容。这项定性定量研究深入分析了抗逆转录病毒疗法就诊过程中的视频录像,以探讨在医疗互动过程中如何进行 "性 "对话。我们的研究结果表明,与性有关的话语比例极低,在分析的 14372 条话语中仅占 1.3%。性话题主要由医生引入(72%),而由夫妻引入的性话题中,64%由男性报告。通过对这些话语的定性分析,我们发现关于性的交流有三个不同的层次:明确、几乎明确和含蓄。医生和男性在这三个层次上的分布几乎是平衡的,而女性患者则主要对医生发起的明确和几乎明确的交流做出反应。尽管在临床领域,性健康应该得到高度关注,但在 ART 互动中,性话题所占的比例很低,这突出表明了此类对话的稀缺性。打开性对话的大门,有助于为患者创造一个安全和支持性的空间来谈论性,从而对抗逆疗法过程中的幸福感和护理质量产生潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology was founded in 1982 in order to provide a scientific forum for obstetricians, gynecologists, psychiatrists and psychologists, academic health professionals as well as for all those who are interested in the psychosocial and psychosomatic aspects of women’s health. Another of its aims is to stimulate obstetricians and gynecologists to pay more attention to this very important facet of their profession.
期刊最新文献
Retracted article: The effects of fish oil omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on mental health parameters and metabolic status of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Effect of social support on fetal movement self-monitoring behavior in Chinese women: a moderated mediation model of health beliefs. The role and outcomes of music therapy during pregnancy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Assessment of factors related to poly cystic ovarian syndrome - A comparative and correlational study. Investigating socioeconomic disparities of Kangaroo mother care on preterm infant health outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1