Lasso-Cox interpretable model of AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical & Translational Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1007/s12094-024-03588-0
Han Li, Chengyuan Zhou, Chenjie Wang, Bo Li, Yanqiong Song, Bo Yang, Yan Zhang, Xueting Li, Mingyue Rao, Jianwen Zhang, Ke Su, Kun He, Yunwei Han
{"title":"Lasso-Cox interpretable model of AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma.","authors":"Han Li, Chengyuan Zhou, Chenjie Wang, Bo Li, Yanqiong Song, Bo Yang, Yan Zhang, Xueting Li, Mingyue Rao, Jianwen Zhang, Ke Su, Kun He, Yunwei Han","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03588-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma patients, markers for predicting tumor progression or prognosis are limited. Therefore, our objective is to establish an optimal predicet model for this subset of patients, utilizing interpretable methods to enhance the accuracy of HCC prognosis prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited a total of 508 AFP-negative HCC patients in this study, modeling with randomly divided training set and validated with validation set. At the same time, 86 patients treated in different time periods were used as internal validation. After comparing the cox model with the random forest model based on Lasso regression, we have chosen the former to build our model. This model has been interpreted with SHAP values and validated using ROC, DCA. Additionally, we have reconfirmed the model's effectiveness by employing an internal validation set of independent periods. Subsequently, we have established a risk stratification system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AUC values of the Lasso-Cox model at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.807, 0.846, and 0.803, and the AUC values of the Lasso-RSF model at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.783, 0.829, and 0.776. Lasso-Cox model was finally used to predict the prognosis of AFP-negative HCC patients in this study. And BCLC stage, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), diameter of tumor, lung metastases (LM), albumin (ALB), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and the number of tumors were included in the model. The validation set and the separate internal validation set both indicate that the model is stable and accurate. Using risk factors to establish risk stratification, we observed that the survival time of the low-risk group, the middle-risk group, and the high-risk group decreased gradually, with significant differences among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Lasso-Cox model based on AFP-negative HCC showed good predictive performance for liver cancer. SHAP explained the model for further clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":50685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"309-318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03588-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma patients, markers for predicting tumor progression or prognosis are limited. Therefore, our objective is to establish an optimal predicet model for this subset of patients, utilizing interpretable methods to enhance the accuracy of HCC prognosis prediction.

Methods: We recruited a total of 508 AFP-negative HCC patients in this study, modeling with randomly divided training set and validated with validation set. At the same time, 86 patients treated in different time periods were used as internal validation. After comparing the cox model with the random forest model based on Lasso regression, we have chosen the former to build our model. This model has been interpreted with SHAP values and validated using ROC, DCA. Additionally, we have reconfirmed the model's effectiveness by employing an internal validation set of independent periods. Subsequently, we have established a risk stratification system.

Results: The AUC values of the Lasso-Cox model at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.807, 0.846, and 0.803, and the AUC values of the Lasso-RSF model at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.783, 0.829, and 0.776. Lasso-Cox model was finally used to predict the prognosis of AFP-negative HCC patients in this study. And BCLC stage, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), diameter of tumor, lung metastases (LM), albumin (ALB), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and the number of tumors were included in the model. The validation set and the separate internal validation set both indicate that the model is stable and accurate. Using risk factors to establish risk stratification, we observed that the survival time of the low-risk group, the middle-risk group, and the high-risk group decreased gradually, with significant differences among the three groups.

Conclusion: The Lasso-Cox model based on AFP-negative HCC showed good predictive performance for liver cancer. SHAP explained the model for further clinical application.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AFP 阴性肝细胞癌的 Lasso-Cox 可解释模型。
背景:在AFP阴性肝细胞癌患者中,用于预测肿瘤进展或预后的标志物非常有限。因此,我们的目标是为这部分患者建立一个最佳预测模型,利用可解释的方法提高 HCC 预后预测的准确性:本研究共招募了 508 例 AFP 阴性的 HCC 患者,使用随机分配的训练集建模,并使用验证集进行验证。同时,86 名在不同时期接受治疗的患者作为内部验证。在比较了 cox 模型和基于 Lasso 回归的随机森林模型后,我们选择了前者来建立我们的模型。我们用 SHAP 值对该模型进行了解释,并使用 ROC 和 DCA 进行了验证。此外,我们还通过使用独立时期的内部验证集再次确认了模型的有效性。随后,我们建立了一个风险分层系统:Lasso-Cox模型在1年、2年和3年的AUC值分别为0.807、0.846和0.803,Lasso-RSF模型在1年、2年和3年的AUC值分别为0.783、0.829和0.776。本研究最终采用 Lasso-Cox 模型预测了 AFP 阴性 HCC 患者的预后。模型还包括 BCLC 分期、γ-谷氨酰转移酶(GGT)、肿瘤直径、肺转移灶(LM)、白蛋白(ALB)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)和肿瘤数目。验证集和单独的内部验证集都表明该模型是稳定和准确的。利用风险因素进行风险分层,我们观察到低风险组、中风险组和高风险组的生存时间逐渐缩短,三组之间差异显著:结论:基于 AFP 阴性 HCC 的 Lasso-Cox 模型对肝癌具有良好的预测效果。SHAP解释了该模型在临床上的进一步应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Oncology is an international journal devoted to fostering interaction between experimental and clinical oncology. It covers all aspects of research on cancer, from the more basic discoveries dealing with both cell and molecular biology of tumour cells, to the most advanced clinical assays of conventional and new drugs. In addition, the journal has a strong commitment to facilitating the transfer of knowledge from the basic laboratory to the clinical practice, with the publication of educational series devoted to closing the gap between molecular and clinical oncologists. Molecular biology of tumours, identification of new targets for cancer therapy, and new technologies for research and treatment of cancer are the major themes covered by the educational series. Full research articles on a broad spectrum of subjects, including the molecular and cellular bases of disease, aetiology, pathophysiology, pathology, epidemiology, clinical features, and the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer, will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Azathioprine and risk of non-melanoma skin cancers in organ transplant recipients: a systematic review and update meta-analysis. PMN-MDSCs are responsible for immune suppression in anti-PD-1 treated TAP1 defective melanoma. Gender and sex differences in colorectal cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment. Evaluating the prognostic role of glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in first line: a study by the Turkish Oncology Group Kidney Cancer Consortium (TKCC). Single and multitarget stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with single isocenter in the treatment of multiple brain metastases (BM): institutional experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1