Patient-reported outcome survey of user-experiences in the spinal cord injured-community with MPPT for treating wounds and pressure injuries and for controlling soft tissue infection caused by osteomyelitis.

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2024.1386518
Damian Smith, Mark Ridler
{"title":"Patient-reported outcome survey of user-experiences in the spinal cord injured-community with MPPT for treating wounds and pressure injuries and for controlling soft tissue infection caused by osteomyelitis.","authors":"Damian Smith, Mark Ridler","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2024.1386518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at high risk of developing pressure injuries. Reports in the SCI-community had indicated that a new class of wound treatment, MPPT (micropore-particle-technology), was effective in treating pressure injuries. The British Spinal Injuries Association therefore conducted a survey among MPPT-users to learn from their experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online survey restricted to individuals with spinal cord injury. Participants were requested to identify themselves to permit validation of statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey had 41 respondents reporting on a total of 49 wounds of which the two main categories were wounds (<i>n</i> = 33), primarily pelvic pressure ulcers; and draining fistulas (<i>n</i> = 9) caused by osteomyelitis. All wounds reported had reached full closure. Median duration of MPPT use and time to closure were 3 and 4 weeks for acute wounds (<6 weeks old) and 8 and 10 weeks for chronic wounds, respectively. On draining fistulas, MPPT had been used to reduce wound size, remove soft tissue infection, avoid sepsis, reduce autonomic dysreflexia, improve overall health, and avoid bed rest, whilst waiting for surgery. Comments on MPPT were 84% highly positive, 11% positive, and 0% negative. No adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MPPT achieved a 100% closure rate of acute and chronic wounds, and, in draining fistulas, effectively controlled soft tissue infection resulting from osteomyelitis. MPPT does not require bed rest and is suitable for self-care and telemedicine, promoting independence and higher quality-of-life. The findings strongly agree with a recent clinical study of MPPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11222669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1386518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at high risk of developing pressure injuries. Reports in the SCI-community had indicated that a new class of wound treatment, MPPT (micropore-particle-technology), was effective in treating pressure injuries. The British Spinal Injuries Association therefore conducted a survey among MPPT-users to learn from their experiences.

Methods: Online survey restricted to individuals with spinal cord injury. Participants were requested to identify themselves to permit validation of statement.

Results: The survey had 41 respondents reporting on a total of 49 wounds of which the two main categories were wounds (n = 33), primarily pelvic pressure ulcers; and draining fistulas (n = 9) caused by osteomyelitis. All wounds reported had reached full closure. Median duration of MPPT use and time to closure were 3 and 4 weeks for acute wounds (<6 weeks old) and 8 and 10 weeks for chronic wounds, respectively. On draining fistulas, MPPT had been used to reduce wound size, remove soft tissue infection, avoid sepsis, reduce autonomic dysreflexia, improve overall health, and avoid bed rest, whilst waiting for surgery. Comments on MPPT were 84% highly positive, 11% positive, and 0% negative. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: MPPT achieved a 100% closure rate of acute and chronic wounds, and, in draining fistulas, effectively controlled soft tissue infection resulting from osteomyelitis. MPPT does not require bed rest and is suitable for self-care and telemedicine, promoting independence and higher quality-of-life. The findings strongly agree with a recent clinical study of MPPT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓损伤社区用户使用 MPPT 治疗伤口和压力损伤以及控制骨髓炎引起的软组织感染的患者报告结果调查。
背景:脊髓损伤(SCI)患者是压力伤的高危人群。SCI 社区的报告显示,一种新型伤口治疗方法 MPPT(微孔颗粒技术)可有效治疗压力伤。因此,英国脊柱损伤协会对 MPPT 用户进行了一项调查,以了解他们的经验:在线调查仅限于脊髓损伤患者。方法:仅限脊髓损伤患者参与的在线调查,要求参与者表明身份,以便验证其陈述:调查中,41 名受访者共报告了 49 处伤口,其中主要分为两类:伤口(33 处),主要是骨盆压疮;以及骨髓炎引起的引流性瘘管(9 处)。所有报告的伤口均已完全闭合。急性伤口使用 MPPT 的中位持续时间和闭合时间分别为 3 周和 4 周(结论:MPPT 的闭合率达到 100%:MPPT 可使急性和慢性伤口的闭合率达到 100%,对于引流瘘管,可有效控制骨髓炎引起的软组织感染。MPPT 无需卧床休息,适合自我护理和远程医疗,可提高独立性和生活质量。这些研究结果与最近一项关于 MPPT 的临床研究结果非常吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Responses of several measures to different intensity levels of upper limb exergames in children with neurological diagnoses: a pilot study. Counting the costs: understanding the extra costs of living with disability in Indonesia to advance inclusive policies within the SDG framework. Exploring knowledge, perception, and use of surface electromyography in physiotherapy post graduate trainees in Italy: a single center preliminary survey. Distinguishing pain profiles among individuals with long COVID. Qualitative evaluation of factors influencing adherence to virtual exercise programs for people with physical disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1