Vulval squamous cell cancer - does precursor lesion margin status affect recurrence-free survival after optimal surgical resection for early-stage disease?

Andrew A Durden, Pete Sanderson, Nidal Ghaoui, Scott Fegan, Cameron Martin, Chee Thum, James May
{"title":"Vulval squamous cell cancer - does precursor lesion margin status affect recurrence-free survival after optimal surgical resection for early-stage disease?","authors":"Andrew A Durden, Pete Sanderson, Nidal Ghaoui, Scott Fegan, Cameron Martin, Chee Thum, James May","doi":"10.5603/gpl.98720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Vulval cancer accounts for around 4% of all gynaecological malignancies and most tumours ( > 90%) are of a squamous cell histotype. Most lesions arise on a background of differentiated VIN (dVIN) or lichen sclerosus (LS). Surgical treatment has undergone a paradigm shift with less radical surgery being attempted to preserve vulval structure and function, without compromising oncological outcome.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this single site retrospective analysis, we consider the data from a tertiary oncology unit, to assess progression-free survival based on the presence of a precursor lesion at the margin of resection.123 patients with FIGO stage 1 vulvar SCC (n = 33 1A, n = 90 1B) were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One Hundred Five patients (85%) had an associated precursor lesion (dVIN and/or LS). Within the follow-up period, 33 patients (26.8%) had invasive recurrence, of which 24 (72.7%) had surgical resection margins which were positive for a precursor lesion. In patients with an acceptable microscopically clear invasive resection margin of > 2 mm the presence of a precursor lesion at the margin conveyed a higher risk of malignant recurrence when compared to those with completely clear margins (HR = 2.42; 95% CI 1.14-5.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study adds to the available literature emphasising the clinical significance of dVIN or LS at the surgical margin of optimally resected disease. In those who have marginal involvement of a precancerous lesion, increased surveillance should be considered. Future work should explore the need for additional adjuvant therapy in this cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":94021,"journal":{"name":"Ginekologia polska","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ginekologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/gpl.98720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Vulval cancer accounts for around 4% of all gynaecological malignancies and most tumours ( > 90%) are of a squamous cell histotype. Most lesions arise on a background of differentiated VIN (dVIN) or lichen sclerosus (LS). Surgical treatment has undergone a paradigm shift with less radical surgery being attempted to preserve vulval structure and function, without compromising oncological outcome.

Material and methods: In this single site retrospective analysis, we consider the data from a tertiary oncology unit, to assess progression-free survival based on the presence of a precursor lesion at the margin of resection.123 patients with FIGO stage 1 vulvar SCC (n = 33 1A, n = 90 1B) were included.

Results: One Hundred Five patients (85%) had an associated precursor lesion (dVIN and/or LS). Within the follow-up period, 33 patients (26.8%) had invasive recurrence, of which 24 (72.7%) had surgical resection margins which were positive for a precursor lesion. In patients with an acceptable microscopically clear invasive resection margin of > 2 mm the presence of a precursor lesion at the margin conveyed a higher risk of malignant recurrence when compared to those with completely clear margins (HR = 2.42; 95% CI 1.14-5.16).

Conclusions: This study adds to the available literature emphasising the clinical significance of dVIN or LS at the surgical margin of optimally resected disease. In those who have marginal involvement of a precancerous lesion, increased surveillance should be considered. Future work should explore the need for additional adjuvant therapy in this cohort.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外阴鳞状细胞癌--早期疾病最佳手术切除后,前驱病灶边缘状态是否会影响无复发生存率?
目的:外阴癌约占所有妇科恶性肿瘤的 4%,大多数肿瘤(超过 90%)为鳞状细胞组织型。大多数病变发生在分化型外阴癌(dVIN)或外阴硬皮病(LS)的基础上。手术治疗的模式已经发生了转变,在不影响肿瘤治疗效果的前提下,尝试采用不那么激进的手术来保留外阴结构和功能:在这一单部位回顾性分析中,我们考虑了一家三级肿瘤科的数据,根据切除边缘是否存在前驱病灶来评估无进展生存期。结果:纳入了 123 例 FIGO 1 期外阴 SCC 患者(n = 33 1A,n = 90 1B):结果:有 15 例患者(85%)伴有前驱病变(dVIN 和/或 LS)。在随访期间,33 名患者(26.8%)出现侵袭性复发,其中 24 名患者(72.7%)的手术切除边缘前病变呈阳性。在显微镜下可接受的侵袭性切除边缘清晰度大于 2 毫米的患者中,与边缘完全清晰的患者相比,边缘存在前驱病灶的患者恶性肿瘤复发的风险更高(HR = 2.42;95% CI 1.14-5.16):本研究补充了现有文献,强调了最佳切除病灶的手术边缘dVIN或LS的临床意义。对于癌前病变边缘受累的患者,应考虑加强监测。今后的工作应探讨是否有必要对这部分患者进行额外的辅助治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of emotions in pregnancy: introduction of the Pregnancy Anxiety and Stress Rating Scale (PASRS) and its application in the context of hospitalization. Baseline data on distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV-) genotypes in cervical samples of gynecological patients before implementation of population-based HPV- vaccination program in Polande implementation of population-based HPV vaccination program in Poland. Comparison of Polymerase Chain Reaction Method with Culture Method in Antenatal Group B Streptococcus Screening. Dietary patterns of Polish pregnant women in reference to prepregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain. Impact of body mass index and gestational weight gain on cesarean delivery rates: a comparative study of dinoprostone-induced vs spontaneous labor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1